Saying that the Koch bros support Hillary is okay to say here

[dlwickham]

I alerted on a post and it came back 5-2 to keep it

This goes beyond sad and hits pathetic

[fun n serious]

1. Wow!!!

and the slightest criticism of Sanders is no tolerated

[dlwickham]

2. Pretty much

[fun n serious]

7. Here is a good example

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1365279

[liberal N proud]

3. There was a thread earlier about how juries are loaded with BS supporters

Basically you don't stand a chance.

[Marr]

4. Maybe because it's true?

She's received donations from the Kochs. That's just true.

Do you seriously expect factual posts to be hidden, simply because they don't reflect well on your candidate?

[dlwickham]

8. and they're supporting her now?

[SharonClark]

9. They don't support her

They gave her a small amount in 2008 but they certainly haven't supported her since and she is opposed to their lifesblood - Citizen's United. Quit making stuff up in the Hillary Group. Please delete your post.

[shenmue]

10. You do realize this is the Hillary Group?

Go back to the Sanders playroom. Obviously you can't take the SC loss.

[displacedtexan]

12. The verb tense is correct in your post: "received" ($3500 in 2008)

And it was once, not "donations."

Please fix your post because you're right to be concerned with "factual" posts.

Thanks in advance for fixing it.

[Thinkingabout]

5. I read recently one liked Sanders.

[Cha]

6. Yeah, no surprise, dlwickham.. par for the course around here.

That is why I don't go into the fact free zone.

[DesertRat]

11. Anything goes

As long as it's directed at Hillary.

[Loki]

13. This board has an infestation problem

I hope after Super Tuesday, we can start cleaning things up.

[Coolest Ranger]

14. alert on it again

when it comes back in your mailbox so the admins can get it

[UtahLib]

15. Meh, par for 'their' course (or coarse). nt