Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:35 PM Jan 2016

Most Of The “Most Valuable Progressives” Named By ‘The Nation’ Have Endorsed…Hillary?

If like me you’re a longtime and faithful reader of The Nation — a venerable publication celebrating its 150th anniversary — then you probably saw its recent cover editorial endorsing Bernie Sanders for president. That lengthy essay, along with many other Nation articles over the past several months, leaves the unmistakable impression that Sanders is the only truly progressive choice for Democratic voters.

Yet just a month ago, The Nation published its 2015 Progressive Honor Roll, an annual feature written by John Nichols, who happens to be a highly enthusiastic Sanders supporter — which named several strong supporters of Hillary Clinton among America’s “most valuable” progressives. In fact, of the individuals named on Nichols’ list, nearly every single one is backing Clinton (one exception is Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell, “most valuable Cabinet member,” who must observe administration neutrality in the primary but — as a former top Clinton administration official — would very likely endorse her).

[link:http://www.nationalmemo.com/most-of-the-most-valuable-progressives-named-by-the-nation-have-endorsed-hillary/|
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most Of The “Most Valuable Progressives” Named By ‘The Nation’ Have Endorsed…Hillary? (Original Post) 72DejaVu Jan 2016 OP
My my my. Fancy that. Hekate Jan 2016 #1
.. Cha Jan 2016 #4
oops DURHAM D Jan 2016 #2
Wow, Great find, DejaVu! Cha Jan 2016 #3
Ikr? Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #5
Guess they want to win.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #6
Probably know Hillary is the most qualified candidate running. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #7
Yep. And the ONLY candidate running on our side who can actually put 'meat' behind her BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #14
yes, a very good post Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #15
Thanks, Thinkingabout! :-) eom BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #16
K & R Iliyah Jan 2016 #8
They're either scared of the Clintons or they're oligarchs dlwickham Jan 2016 #9
Bought by Goldman Sachs brer cat Jan 2016 #10
Well, of course they have. Who else would "Democrats" endorse? Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #11
Interesting find. k&r brer cat Jan 2016 #12
KICK! Cha Jan 2016 #13
I love The Nation! Kath1 Jan 2016 #17

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
14. Yep. And the ONLY candidate running on our side who can actually put 'meat' behind her
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jan 2016

policies and get those through. She knows how to navigate the pitfalls and procedural filibustering that Republicans are bound to use if they don't get one of their macho-men into the White House.

What I love about Hillary Clinton is, she takes no prisoners. She's a fighter and she's fearless, and that's what we need in order to strengthen and expand the good work President Obama has been able to get through.

dlwickham

(3,316 posts)
9. They're either scared of the Clintons or they're oligarchs
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jan 2016

Because no one would support Hillary because she's the best candidate out there; they have to be coerced

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Most Of The “Most Valuabl...