Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumHopefully, the Sander's servers will be given over to the FBI. My information....
is probably on there and I really object to the Sander's staff copying it to their files. This is what comes of giving a non-democrat access to our party's information.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,443 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)GusBob
(7,629 posts)Socialist agenda+lists=????
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)protected from getting any Bernie emails or phone calls.
One way to tell if they screwed the pooch is if any of us gets a Bernie phone call or email.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I mean- why miss an opportunity to get your daily digs in up front and personal? You could probably get all his campaign personnel to change who they support with your clever witticisms, No? After all, look how well it's worked for you folks here.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Response to notadmblnd (Reply #9)
Post removed
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Just another petty crook.
Rose Siding
(32,624 posts)And why is it that so many BS supporters don't have the self control to stay out of the Hillary group? Could it be youth? Or if they are older, maybe they're those rugged individual types who eschew rules and seat belts. Anarchists? The psychology of it always makes me curious. It's not like there isn't the ENTIRE rest of the board for them.
Cha
(306,278 posts)from his campaign.
"Daily digs"? Oh you mean like the ones where 85% of the board is getting their smears on Hillary? Why be hypocritical about this?
"Worked out for us here..."? In the DU bubble where we're in the minority? And, such a beautiful minority it is, too.
Thankfully in the Real World Hillary is way ahead and hopefully this will only get stronger and she'll be our next President and carry on President Obama's excellent legacy.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)It's the DNC's server. So you might want to give little Debbie a call and express your concerns to her.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)If he isn't a crook then he should give an third party access to his servers.
Cha
(306,278 posts)got Fired.
You might want to get your facts straight.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)stonecutter357
(12,789 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)DWS and DNC already look HORRIBLE
HORRIBLE
in this issue.
If you wanted to DESTROY the Clinton campaign, this is a SURE fire way to do it.
UNBELIEVABLE
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)This is just a discussion board
randys1
(16,286 posts)shakes her finger at the DNC and asks them to reverse their decision.
I pray to god she does because I want her, if not Bernie who is my first choice, to be our next Prez, and what the DNC is doing right now is putting that in GRAVE jeopardy.
If you dont see that, then you are forgetting that there is this thing called undecided, middle of the road voters who might decide who the next prez is.
I swear to god this looks HORRIBLE to anyone paying attention.
Please trust me, you know I am as unbiased as anyone on this board...
I have not heard a single caller to my shows on Sirius who hasnt lambasted the DNC and DWS...
Forget the details, it LOOKS terrible and both of our candidates will be harmed.
SunSeeker
(54,240 posts)Come by the Hillary Group often?
William769
(56,354 posts)SunSeeker
(54,240 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)No one looks as bad as Watergate Bernie and his band of thieves! I guess he's not so pure anymore.
Dawson Leery
(19,384 posts)I do not want any harrasing calls from the pro-left.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,443 posts)somebody out just for hell of it. It would be great practice.
SunSeeker
(54,240 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I don't want his people having my info as well.
I got to wonder if the idea was to set up the democratic party all along?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I dont see this coming out well for Sanders. I am wondering if he will make statement on this issue.
riversedge
(73,844 posts)I have read that this information was saved. But where? And who has it now??
.....What was accessed [by Sander's campaign snooper}
Two senior Democrats familiar with the program and the investigation told CNN that the Sanders campaign accessed turnout projections for Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, a key piece of strategy the Clinton campaign has been working on with modeling and analytics.
The Sanders team, which consisted of four people, ran multiple searches in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina and about 10 March states, including Florida and Colorado. In Iowa and New Hampshire, the Clinton campaign has ranked voters on a scale of 1-100 for turnout, enthusiasm and support, the senior Democrats said. The Sanders campaign ran two searches: "Show me all the Clinton people rated higher than 60" and "Show me all the people rated less than 30." This would be a key way of knowing who Sanders should target in the final weeks before voting: Ignore those above 60, while focus on those below 30, because they are looking for a Clinton alternative and might be open to Sanders.
The investigation into what information was lifted should only take a few days as there are audit logs and trails of the activity, which took place beginning around 10:40 a.m. and lasting for about 40 minutes, the senior Democrats said.
They added that the Clinton campaign views this as a big deal but will not say so publicly because it will fan the flames of liberal groups trying to fight with the DNC.
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the Clinton campaign called for the Sanders campaign and the DNC to "work expeditiously to ensure that our data is not in the Sanders campaign's account and that the Sanders campaign only have access to their own data."................
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-dnc-suspension/index.html
Rose Siding
(32,624 posts)Worse than I thought.