Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:12 PM Apr 2016

New FEC letter ~ BS and Campaign (HRC GROUP)

Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:52 PM - Edit history (1)

FEC Letter from April 6, 2016" http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf

New letter from FEC, 270 pages long. All kinds of problems! They seem to be getting worse!

Table below is example of donors flagged for being in excess of $ 2,700

?w=960&h=737




HRC GROUP READY
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New FEC letter ~ BS and Campaign (HRC GROUP) (Original Post) Her Sister Apr 2016 OP
$27 Donations Her Sister Apr 2016 #1
Kudos for finding this! LAS14 Apr 2016 #17
That list is confusing. This ONE person made all these "small" donations on the same date? And.... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2016 #35
That's just one page of the 200+ pages Her Sister Apr 2016 #36
K & R for exposure. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #2
Wait until the FEC gets all the info on the Rome trip leftofcool Apr 2016 #3
What will happen if Bernie is nominated okasha Apr 2016 #21
IMHO only one of those is probable. eom fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #32
Don't worry NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #41
There will definitely be a third okasha Apr 2016 #42
Yes, especially since his campaign paid for his family NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #43
Weird they aren't tracking donations properly SharonClark Apr 2016 #4
Not Weird Blue Idaho Apr 2016 #39
It's unbelievable that the Sanders Treasurer can't keep track of even the most simple... George II Apr 2016 #5
Could you find a better source than that wordpress link? NuclearDem Apr 2016 #6
There's the FEC letter!! Itself! Her Sister Apr 2016 #7
I know, and the post can stand on its own with that. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #13
Allright I edited out! Her Sister Apr 2016 #15
Thank you. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #16
I hear ya!!! Her Sister Apr 2016 #23
It's a political cartoon about Standard Oil from 1904 by Udo Keppler. KitSileya Apr 2016 #18
Ah Thank you! Her Sister Apr 2016 #24
Oh, duh, of course. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #38
Oh come on now Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #8
27$ Donations? Her Sister Apr 2016 #9
Maybe $27 is a code! pandr32 Apr 2016 #11
I was going to say someone may have confused $27.00 with $2700.00. :-) spooky3 Apr 2016 #25
The $27 number is no mistake Blue Idaho Apr 2016 #40
K&r stopbush Apr 2016 #10
Ooops! 2naSalit Apr 2016 #12
Oh dear sister_rosa_refried Apr 2016 #14
Mr Cory Archibal along has contributed $3350; $650 over the limit of $2700. Fla Dem Apr 2016 #19
I just ran Jeremy Abramowitz' numbers jmowreader Apr 2016 #20
Is that this person? Her Sister Apr 2016 #29
Probably and on Facebook too radical noodle Apr 2016 #30
How the hell can you make 1500 phone calls in one day and still eat? jmowreader Apr 2016 #33
By IV? eom radical noodle Apr 2016 #34
Again deadline is May 11, 2016 to answer the FEC Her Sister Apr 2016 #22
$27 at a time liberal N proud Apr 2016 #26
Thanks Her Sister, great thread and great responses. R B Garr Apr 2016 #27
One more number: OilemFirchen Apr 2016 #28
Must be a lot of 1 cent contributions in order to achieve the $27 average. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #31
The individual contribution amounts are also suspicious. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #37
First letter was 95 pages, second about 150, this one 270? Unbelievably sloppy and perhaps... George II Apr 2016 #44
Thank you, HS! Cha Apr 2016 #45
K&R. nt UtahLib Apr 2016 #46
 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
1. $27 Donations
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:14 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:52 PM - Edit history (2)

Some people donate many times so they could be who BS means when talking about the $27 average, again flagged b/c of excessive amount over limits.




?w=960&h=752

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
17. Kudos for finding this!
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

Before I post it in GDP, can some folks tell me the relative histories of Sanders an Hillary getting such letters? I'm guessing their more common than uncommon?

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
35. That list is confusing. This ONE person made all these "small" donations on the same date? And....
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 05:44 PM
Apr 2016

what is the point of that?

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
3. Wait until the FEC gets all the info on the Rome trip
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie will be paying back his campaign a bunch of money.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
41. Don't worry
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

He won't be nominated. He may still be indicted. It's hard to believe his campaign is this sloppy; keeping track of donations and making sure they're legal is basic stuff. But now he can't claim ignorance...this is what...the second FEC letter?

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
43. Yes, especially since his campaign paid for his family
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:00 PM
Apr 2016

His wife, 4 children and 4 grandchildren. He may be able to get away with Jane going along, but the pack of children? I'd be pissed if I had contributed hard-earned $$ and he blows it on a private jet for his family.

Blue Idaho

(5,048 posts)
39. Not Weird
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:12 PM
Apr 2016

It's a cynical calculated risk. Sanders knows the FEC is a toothless tiger and the likelihood of significant penalties and fines is almost nil. Meanwhile it distorts the donation statistics and helps propagate the myth that he has no big money backers.

George II

(67,782 posts)
5. It's unbelievable that the Sanders Treasurer can't keep track of even the most simple...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

.....and at the same time most important aspect of running a campaign committee. When you reach $2700 STOP taking contributions from that person. Simple. If you do take more than $2700 it's blatantly obvious that you're doing a poor job of keeping track of your contributions and contributors.

And then we have all those millions of dollars of "unitemized" small contributions. If they're unitemized, how does the Treasurer know that one contributor hasn't given 200 small contributions that aggregate to more than the limit?

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
6. Could you find a better source than that wordpress link?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

That octopus tentacle cartoon at the link is horrifically antisemitic--the Nazis were famous for using that kind of imagery.

Even if the subject of the article wasn't Jewish himself, the fact that the octopus seems to be reaching out from Israel is enough to make me gag.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
15. Allright I edited out!
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:51 PM
Apr 2016

That writer is the only who seems to be on top of this situation.

Thanks for the heads up about the offending depiction!

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
16. Thank you.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

Sorry, I didn't want to come off as brow-beating, but that kind of imagery just irks me. We don't need to be giving Sanders supporters ammunition.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
18. It's a political cartoon about Standard Oil from 1904 by Udo Keppler.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:26 PM
Apr 2016

No Nazis involved, I promise. 100% American greed portrayed.

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2001695241/

Licrary of Congress entry:

"Title: Next!
Creator(s): Keppler, Udo J., 1872-1956, artist
Date Created/Published: N.Y. : J. Ottmann Lith. Co., Puck Bldg., 1904 September 7.
Medium: 1 photomechanical print : offset, color.
Summary: Illustration shows a "Standard Oil" storage tank as an octopus with many tentacles wrapped around the steel, copper, and shipping industries, as well as a state house, the U.S. Capitol, and one tentacle reaching for the White House.
Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-ppmsca-25884 (digital file from original print in Case Y) LC-USZC4-435 (color film copy transparency) LC-USZ62-26205 (b&w film copy neg.) LC-USZCN4-122 (color film copy neg.)
Rights Advisory: No known restrictions on publication.
Call Number: Illus. in AP101.P7 1904 [General Collections] (Case Y) [P&P]
Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print"

Blue Idaho

(5,048 posts)
40. The $27 number is no mistake
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:15 PM
Apr 2016

It just makes it easier for donors to figure out how many seperate donations they can make before maxing the system. It's a system designed to confuse and distort statistics and fit a specific campaign narrative. It's a lie.

Fla Dem

(23,645 posts)
19. Mr Cory Archibal along has contributed $3350; $650 over the limit of $2700.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee. Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
20. I just ran Jeremy Abramowitz' numbers
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

He donated $15,900 to Bernie's campaign on February 29. (I chose that one date to add up because so many contributions were made by him on that one day.) And it's all in sub-legal, and random, amounts...there's a couple of $1 donations in there, some $27, a few low-four-figure entries...no single donation is illegal, but the total is definitely illegal.

It looks to me like Sanders is trying to have his cake and eat it too - to not "have a super PAC" and have his pure campaign be besmirched by that most evil of fundraising mechanisms, but to raise money for his campaign like a super PAC would.

There's also a chance - how good it is, I don't know - Jeremy is working as a cutout between the Sanders campaign and foreign nationals living in New York City. The one-dollar donations make no sense unless Jeremy was going down 34th Street harassing the food cart guys to donate to the Sanders campaign, and they gave him a buck to shut him up.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
29. Is that this person?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 04:33 PM
Apr 2016
https://www.berniepb.com/u/jbabramowitz/

https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4cfbfa/legendary_phonebanker_jeremy_abramowitz_made_915/

Phonebank for Bernie!Legendary phonebanker Jeremy Abramowitz made 915 calls yesterday and there isn’t even a primary this week to motivate him. Thank him by making 91 calls today. self.SandersForPresident
submitted 19 days ago * by buddybaker10
Edit: Jeremy is now on Reddit! He has posted this and just wants you to phone bank, so go there right now and pledge a number of calls today to show you really appreciate it! Also, mod u/kateschmidt has confirmed his call numbers are legit and people doing phone banking for Bernie say you can do 100-150 calls an hour. So it just takes a lot of hours. But the lines are open 14 hours, so be a hero! [End of edit]
How much do you really want Bernie to be the next President?
I hope you (and I) want it one tenth as much as Bernie PB user jbabramowitz, who after Monday tops the weekly scoreboard with 915 calls.
But this was really just one more day in the life of our favorite-ordinary-guy-doing-legendary-stuff Jeremy. He has been using Bernie PB for 5 days, and he’s made 3950 calls (that’s almost 800 calls a day!).
He’s an ordinary guy like you. So please thank him: make 91 calls today so that he knows you have his back.
Volunteer now. This is the only way we can win. You’re our only hope!
Canvass.
Phonebank.
Volunteer for other stuff.
Donate.
Are you an international supporter? You can phonebank for free or very cheaply. Also, contribute to r/WorldForSanders and let’s grow Bernie’s international supporters community.
Thank you to everyone doing work for Bernie today! Jeremy wouldn’t be able to do this alone!
449 commentsshare

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
33. How the hell can you make 1500 phone calls in one day and still eat?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

Never mind holding down a job...how does he have time to put food in his mouth?

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
22. Again deadline is May 11, 2016 to answer the FEC
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:53 PM
Apr 2016

There was also a table for what seemed foreign contributions, ONCE AGAIN!!

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf


RQ-2
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463
April 6, 2016
SUSAN JACKSON, TREASURER
BERNIE 2016
PO BOX 905
BURLINGTON, VT 05402

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: C00577130

REFERENCE: MARCH MONTHLY REPORT (02/01/2016 - 02/29/2016)

Dear Treasurer:
Response Due Date
05/11/2016
This letter is prompted by the Commission's preliminary review of the report referenced
above. This notice requests information essential to full public disclosure of your
federal election campaign finances. Failure to adequately respond by the response
date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action. Additional
information is needed for the following 8 item(s):
1. The totals listed on Line(s) 21, 22, 23, 28(a), 28(d), and 30, Column B-P of
the Detailed Summary Page appear to be incorrect. Column B-P figures for the
Summary and Detailed Summary Pages should equal the sum of the Column
B-P figures on your previous report and the Column A-P figures on this report.
Please file an amendment to your report to correct the Column B-P
discrepancies for this report and all subsequent report(s) which may be affected
by this correction. Note that Column B-P should reflect only the election
cycle-to-date totals (11/7/12 through 11/8/16). (52 U.S.C. § 30104(b) (formerly
2 U.S.C. § 434(b)) and 11 CFR § 104.3)
2. Schedule A-P of your report discloses one or more contributions that appear
to exceed the limits set forth in the Act (see attached). The Commission notes
your additional explanation regarding the committee's corrective action taken
for some of these contributions.

An individual or a political committee other than an authorized committee or a
qualified multi-candidate committee may not make a contribution(s) to a
candidate for federal office in excess of $2,700 per election. An authorized
committee may not make a contribution(s) to a candidate for federal office in
excess of $2,000 per election. A qualified multi-candidate committee and all
affiliated committees may not make a contribution(s) to a candidate for federal
office in excess of $5,000 per election. The term "contribution" includes any
Image# 201604060300040995
BERNIE 2016
Page 2 of 6
gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value
made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for federal
office. (52 U.S.C. § 30116(a) and (f) (formerly 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) and (f)); 11
CFR §§ 110.1(b), (e) and (k), and 102.13(c))

If any apparently excessive contribution in question was incompletely or
incorrectly disclosed, you must amend your original report with clarifying
information.

Please be reminded that all refunds, redesignations and reattributions must be
made within 60 days of receipt of the contribution. To date, one or more of the
apparent excessive contributions have not been refunded, redesignated, or
reattributed.

For reattributions, the funds can be retained if, within 60 days of receipt, the
excessive amount was properly reattributed to another person. An excessive
contribution is considered properly reattributed if (1) the contributors provide
the committee with written documentation, signed by each contributor,
authorizing a reattribution and indicating the amount of the contribution to be
attributed to each contributor; or (2) the committee reattributes by presumption
the excessive portion of the contribution if the contribution was made on a
written instrument from a joint account and was signed by only one of the
account holders. In this case, the treasurer must notify the contributors in
writing within 60 days of receiving the contribution that the committee intends
to reattribute the excessive portion and must give the contributor who signed
the check an opportunity to request a refund. (11 CFR § 110.1(k)(3)(ii)(B))

For redesignations, the funds can be retained if, within 60 days of receipt, the
excessive amount was properly designated for a different election. An
excessive contribution is considered properly redesignated if (1) the committee
obtains signed written documentation from the contributor(s) authorizing the
redesignation of the contribution for another election, provided that the new
designation does not exceed the limitations on contributions made with respect
to that election; or (2) the committee redesignates by presumption the excessive
portion of the contribution for another election, provided that the new
designation does not exceed the limitations on contributions made with respect
to that election. In this case, the treasurer must notify the contributor of the
redesignation in writing within 60 days of the treasurer's receipt of the
contribution. The notification must give the contributor an opportunity to
request a refund. (11 CFR § 110.1(b)(5)(ii)(B)) A contribution can only be
Image# 201604060300040996
BERNIE 2016
Page 3 of 6
redesignated to a previous election to the extent that the contribution does not
exceed the committee's net debts outstanding for that election. (11 CFR §
110.1(b)(3)(i))

If the foregoing conditions for reattributions or redesignations are not met
within 60 days of receipt, the excessive amount must be refunded. (11 CFR §
103.3(b)(1))

Please inform the Commission of your corrective action immediately in writing
and provide photocopies of any refund checks and/or letters reattributing or
redesignating the contributions in question. Refunds are reported on Line 28(a),
(b), or (c), as applicable, of the Detailed Summary Page and on a supporting
Schedule B-P of the report covering the period in which they are made.
Redesignations and reattributions are reported as memo entries on Schedule
A-P of the report covering the period in which the authorization for the
redesignation and/or reattribution is received. (11 CFR § 104.8(d)(2), (3) and
(4))

Although the Commission may take further legal action concerning the
acceptance of excessive contributions, your prompt action to refund or
redesignate and/or reattribute the excessive amount will be taken into
consideration.
3. Schedule A-P (see attached) discloses a contribution(s) from an individual(s)
who has a mailing address outside of the United States of America. Please be
advised that 52 U.S.C. § 30121(a) (formerly 2 U.S.C. § 441e(a)) and 11 CFR §
110.20 prohibit foreign nationals from making contributions in connection with
any election for political office or in connection with any primary election,
convention, or caucus held to select candidates for any political office.

If the apparently prohibited contribution(s) in question was incompletely or
incorrectly disclosed, you should amend your original report with clarifying
information.

If your committee follows the safe harbor guidelines outlined under 11 CFR §
110.20(a)(7) for all contributions received from a foreign address to ensure that
the sources of these contributions are not foreign nationals, please provide a
detailed description of your procedures. These procedures must be used in all
cases where a contributor or donor uses a foreign passport or passport number
for identification purposes, provides a foreign address, makes a contribution or
donation by means of a check or other written instrument drawn on a foreign
Image# 201604060300040997
BERNIE 2016
Page 4 of 6
bank or by wire transfer from a foreign bank, or resides abroad. A committee is
deemed to have conducted a reasonable inquiry into the contributor or donor's
nationality if you seek and obtain copies of current and valid U.S. passport
papers for U.S. citizens. No person may rely on this safe harbor if he or she has
actual knowledge that the source of the funds solicited, accepted, or received is
a foreign national.

If you have received a contribution from a foreign national, you must refund
the impermissible contribution to the donor in accordance with 11 CFR §
103.3(b). Please inform the Commission of your corrective action immediately
in writing and provide a photocopy of your check for the refund. In addition,
any refunds should be disclosed on Schedule B supporting Line 28(a) of the
report during which the transaction was made. Although the Commission may
take further legal action concerning the acceptance of a prohibited
contribution(s), prompt action on your part to refund or provide clarifying
information concerning these contributions will be taken into consideration.
4. Schedule B-P supporting Line 28(a) of your report discloses refunds to
individuals. It appears that your committee has not reported the receipt of the
original contributions, and has refunded an amount greater than the original
contributions for the attached contributors. Please clarify these refunds and
amend your report(s) as necessary. (52 U.S.C. § 30104(b) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §
434(b)) and 11 CFR § 104.3(a))
5. On Schedule B-P supporting Line 23 of your report, you have itemized
disbursements for which you have failed to include the address. Please amend
your report to include the missing information. (11 CFR § 104.3(b)(4))
6. Itemized disbursements must include a brief statement or description of why
each disbursement was made. Please amend Schedule B-P supporting Line 23
of your report to clarify the following description(s): "Staff Reimbursement."
For further guidance regarding acceptable purposes of disbursement, please
refer to 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i)(A).

Additional clarification regarding inadequate purposes of disbursement
published in the Federal Register can be found at http://www.fec.gov/law/
policy/purposeofdisbursement/inadequate_purpose_list_3507.pdf.
7. Schedule B-P of your report discloses disbursements with the purpose "Per
Diem" that appear to be made from petty cash. Please be advised that cash
Image# 201604060300040998
BERNIE 2016
Page 5 of 6
disbursements to any person or vendor for any single purchase or transaction
may not exceed $100. If payments to the original vendor exceed $200 in an
election cycle, a memo entry including the name of the original vendor as well
as address, date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase must be
provided. Please amend your report to include the missing information or
provide clarifying information if memo items are not required. (52 U.S.C.
§30102(h)(2) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §432(h)(2)) and 11 CFR § 102.11)
8. Schedule B-P of your report discloses reimbursements to individuals for the
following travel related disbursement(s) described as: "Travel
Reimbursement". When the reimbursement amount to individuals for travel and
subsistence advances exceeds $500, the payments by staff to any one vendor
that make up the reimbursement may have to be itemized. For example, if the
related payments to any one vendor aggregate in excess of $200 for the election
cycle, the staff advance payment to the vendor must also be itemized in a memo
entry for that reimbursement. Each memo entry must include the complete
name and address of the original vendor, as well as the date, amount and
detailed purpose of the advance. If itemization is not necessary for a particular
reimbursement to staff in excess of $500, you must indicate so in an
amendment to this report. Please amend your report to include the missing or
clarifying information. See Advisory Opinion 1996-20 for additional
clarification. (11 CFR § 104.9)
Please note, you will not receive an additional notice from the Commission on this
matter. Adequate responses must be received by the Commission on or before the due
date noted above to be taken into consideration in determining whether audit action will
be initiated. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act may also result in an
enforcement action against the committee. Any response submitted by your committee
will be placed on the public record and will be considered by the Commission prior to
taking enforcement action. Requests for extensions of time in which to respond will
not be considered.
Electronic filers must file amendments (to include statements, designations and reports)
in an electronic format and must submit an amended report in its entirety, rather than
just those portions of the report that are being amended. If you should have any
questions regarding this matter or wish to verify the adequacy of your response, please
contact me on our toll-free number (800) 424-9530 (at the prompt press 5 to reach the
Reports Analysis Division) or my local number (202) 694-1166.
Image# 201604060300040999
BERNIE 2016
Page 6 of 6
Sincerely,
Bradley Matheson
Sr. Campaign Finance & Reviewing Analyst
Reports Analysis Division
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
27. Thanks Her Sister, great thread and great responses.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 04:16 PM
Apr 2016

It looks like the BS donation strategy is like his online voting polls, after all. Anonymous and unaccountable people clickety-click-clicking Enter and pretending we all don't notice the irregularities.

George II

(67,782 posts)
44. First letter was 95 pages, second about 150, this one 270? Unbelievably sloppy and perhaps...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:04 PM
Apr 2016

...hoping they can get away with some impermissible contributions?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»New FEC letter ~ BS and C...