Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:45 PM Apr 2016

Jane, please stop.

Whine, whine, whine. She's showing her desperation.

Excerpt:

Jane Sanders, wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), said Wednesday that her husband's widely panned interview with the New York Daily News was "more of an inquisition."

Jane Sanders told CNN that she thought the candidate's hour-long interview with the tabloid's editorial board was "odd."

"We commented on that afterwards, that it was more of an inquisition, hurry, hurry, interrupt, let's ask the questions don't let you even finish your answers," Sanders said. "We didn't realize they had planned to release the transcript. So it became a little bit more evident what they were trying to do."


In other words, the interview was thorough.

Inquisition? 11 hours of questioning before the Benghazi committee, that's an inquisition.

Bernie and Jane are so not ready for prime time politics.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jane-sanders-ny-daily-news-inquisition

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jane, please stop. (Original Post) kstewart33 Apr 2016 OP
I saw her interview.... CherokeeDem Apr 2016 #1
I find her annoying and don't really know why. madaboutharry Apr 2016 #20
There's a self-righteous smugness in her manner that's VERY off-putting. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #23
Me neither. Cannot warm up to either of them. Like the livetohike Apr 2016 #30
I think she is pushing him, too. LisaM Apr 2016 #36
i feel the same way. can't put my finger DesertFlower Apr 2016 #26
Oh brother! mcar Apr 2016 #2
There's always an excuse radical noodle Apr 2016 #3
KNR Lucinda Apr 2016 #4
He's not applying for a job at the local 7-11 wysi Apr 2016 #5
"11 hours of questioning before the Benghazi committee, that's an inquisition." IamMab Apr 2016 #6
+1! eom BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #8
haha sarae Apr 2016 #17
exactly and hillary handled DesertFlower Apr 2016 #28
I believe it's called KewlKat Apr 2016 #7
So, an in depth interview DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #9
Totally out of their league. The petulant whining sounds uncomfortably Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #10
The GOP attack machine would make mincemeat of Sanders by Sept. 1. spooky3 Apr 2016 #15
St. Bernard burned at the political stake by Repub. Inquisition. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #18
I'd like to know why you think it'd take that long jmowreader Apr 2016 #34
LOL! spooky3 Apr 2016 #38
She is the staffer he listens to most, I suspect. MADem Apr 2016 #11
She's a very obvious lier...lots of "tells". She's manifestly out of her depth. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #19
"We didn't realize that [A NEWS ORG.] would release a transcript"????? spooky3 Apr 2016 #12
she's kind of like Ann Romney nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #13
Not ready. KittyWampus Apr 2016 #14
And let me guess: The Corporate Media didn't even try to push back. They allowed her to spew her Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2016 #16
"In other words, the interview was thorough." NurseJackie Apr 2016 #21
K&R SharonClark Apr 2016 #31
If this was the only time in an interview where questions was not answered, he has danced Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #22
The NYDN asked the same questions of Sanders and Hillary. stopbush Apr 2016 #24
There is no depth is exactly right on. Never was. livetohike Apr 2016 #29
Having never been through this before, sure she thought an ordinary interview was an "inquisition". George II Apr 2016 #25
She was a university pres. She can't be shocked spooky3 Apr 2016 #39
Can the Sanders people settle on a story Gothmog Apr 2016 #27
how do someone inquire themselves ??? Setsuna1972 Apr 2016 #32
Nothing sadder than your spouse doing the whining for you. liberal N proud Apr 2016 #33
I have a great imagination wisteria Apr 2016 #35
Can you imagine.. Whiners in the White House? After 8 years of President Obama and Cha Apr 2016 #37

CherokeeDem

(3,709 posts)
1. I saw her interview....
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:47 PM
Apr 2016

agree... they are not ready for prime time. There is an arrogance about Bernie and Jane that I find very annoying.

madaboutharry

(40,200 posts)
20. I find her annoying and don't really know why.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:32 PM
Apr 2016

There is something about her that rubs me the wrong way. It could be the "I'm more virtuous than you vibe" she gives off.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
23. There's a self-righteous smugness in her manner that's VERY off-putting.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:40 PM
Apr 2016

Am NOT drawn to her persona at all.

livetohike

(22,133 posts)
30. Me neither. Cannot warm up to either of them. Like the
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 07:13 PM
Apr 2016

Romneys. Maybe Jane is the one pushing Bernie to run for President.

mcar

(42,287 posts)
2. Oh brother!
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:47 PM
Apr 2016


How does she expect her husband to deal with foreign affairs if he's so delicate he can't handle a newspaper interview?

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
3. There's always an excuse
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:49 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe a flimsy excuse, but an excuse nonetheless. Did they expect that everyone would just tiptoe around him and give him good press?

wysi

(1,512 posts)
5. He's not applying for a job at the local 7-11
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:51 PM
Apr 2016

This is serious stuff. WTF job do they think he's applying for?

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)
9. So, an in depth interview
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:58 PM
Apr 2016

which one would EXPECT from an editorial board before endorsing, in an inquisition? Why? Because he was not prepared? On his signature issue no less. That's all on Bernie that he wasn't prepared, not the interviewer.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
10. Totally out of their league. The petulant whining sounds uncomfortably
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:59 PM
Apr 2016

similar to Trump's temper tantrum on the other side.

UNFAIR! RIGGED! UNFAIR! RIGGED!

Repeat and then stamp your feet, until they treat you like someone of your status deserves, dammit!

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
18. St. Bernard burned at the political stake by Repub. Inquisition.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

Auto-da-fé of the Anointed One and the coronation of t-Rump. OMG.

Frightening prospect.

jmowreader

(50,546 posts)
34. I'd like to know why you think it'd take that long
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:25 PM
Apr 2016

The last day of the convention is July 28. If we were stupid enough to allow Bernie on the ticket, we'd be calling him None Such Sanders by the 10th of August.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. She is the staffer he listens to most, I suspect.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:00 PM
Apr 2016

And if you're going to blame any of the more recent missteps (The POPE, e.g.) on anyone, I would guess those are in her wheelhouse. She plays the Victim card about everything, how Bernie is questioned, her income taxes, you name it. She will own a big chunk of his loss.

The surly, snarly, Hill Hate stuff, though, I don't put on her--that kind of stuff sounds like it's straight outta the Devine - Weaver shop. Very bro-y.

Bernie would probably be doing better if he didn't allow them to force him into the mud like he has been doing. He is NOT a pleasant man--never has been--but I don't think he is naturally vicious. However, his advisors keep pushing him in that direction and all it does is polarize.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
19. She's a very obvious lier...lots of "tells". She's manifestly out of her depth.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016
"...I would guess those are in her wheelhouse. She plays the victim card about everything, how Bernie is questioned, her income taxes, you name it. She will own a big chunk of his loss."
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
16. And let me guess: The Corporate Media didn't even try to push back. They allowed her to spew her
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:20 PM
Apr 2016

bullshit without proper critique.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
21. "In other words, the interview was thorough."
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:33 PM
Apr 2016

Yes ... that's it exactly. It's clear to me that they've both become accustomed to just coasting along and meeting no resistance or scrutiny. When you go for months and months without having to answer tough questions, I suppose it would be very EASY for them to just recline and relax.

Well, SURPRISE!!! That's not how elections are won, Bernie and Jane.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
22. If this was the only time in an interview where questions was not answered, he has danced
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:33 PM
Apr 2016

off to his favorite financial statement. Chris Matthews tried to get the answer how he was going to get his agenda through Congress and he still could not answer the question. This is not once but has been happening since he has declared his candidacy, he may have been tired on the day of the interview with NYDN, must mean he has been tired many more times..

stopbush

(24,393 posts)
24. The NYDN asked the same questions of Sanders and Hillary.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:43 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary answered the questions in depth. If you read the transcript of her interview, the questions are short and the answers are quite deep and extensive. That's the way it's supposed to be when you sit in front of an EDITORIAL BOARD at a major newspaper.

Compare to Sanders, who is asked the same simple questions, doesn't answer them, answers with his canned stump speech bs or stumbles about, saying, "I don't know" and "Hadn't thought about that," and, yeah - you're going to get pushed and jumped on for not providing an acceptable answer to the question. And if your answers don't get any better, then, yeah - it's going to feel like an inquisition.

The problem for Sanders is that this was an OPPORTUNITY for him to provide depth to his sound bites. He failed, because there is no depth to provide to his sound bites...unless he wants to tell the truth and admit that his programs are going to raise people's taxes about three times higher than he's willing to admit.

And as is typical of these two political amateurs, their knee-jerk reaction to their own shortcomings is to play the victim card...again!

So tiresome.

I'll be glad when he's finally out of the race and the ADULT running for president has the floor to herself.

livetohike

(22,133 posts)
29. There is no depth is exactly right on. Never was.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

Everyone is just supposed to trust him. Never mind that he can't explain his ideas or he doesn't know much about foreign policy. What is worse is he has been at this for 25 years!

George II

(67,782 posts)
25. Having never been through this before, sure she thought an ordinary interview was an "inquisition".
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:49 PM
Apr 2016

Welcome to the big time, Janie. If (HUUUUGE IF!) he gets elected, expect a lot more of these "inquisitions". Haven't you and your husband watched the news in the last 20+ years?

Gothmog

(145,046 posts)
27. Can the Sanders people settle on a story
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:53 PM
Apr 2016

One story is that Sanders did a good job in this interview. Of course that story falls apart when you read the interview. The latest is that the press was being mean to Sanders which is the same as saying that Sanders is not up to the job of being POTUS. I wish that the Sanders people will get their excuses straight

Setsuna1972

(332 posts)
32. how do someone inquire themselves ???
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 08:18 PM
Apr 2016

He's the one who couldn't answer anything ! Don't blame the editorial board Jane !

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
35. I have a great imagination
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:30 PM
Apr 2016

But, I can't imagine her anywhere near the White House, unless it is for a tour.

Cha

(297,029 posts)
37. Can you imagine.. Whiners in the White House? After 8 years of President Obama and
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:22 AM
Apr 2016

First Lady Michelle?

No way.. We need Hillary!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Jane, please stop.