HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » International » United Kingdom (Group) » Did you hear the one abou...

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 07:17 AM

Did you hear the one about Julie Burchill???




In December Julie Burchill accused me of worshipping a paedophile and called me an Islamist.

After legal action, she has apologised in full for these falsehoods, for playing into “Islamophobic tropes” and making “racist and misogynist” comments about my appearance and sex life.


Good on Ash for following through on this. That apology .....OUCH.... someone made the joke that the mot disturbing part of this episode was that she admitted Rod Liddle was her friend LOL

There is a more serious point though - what is it with TERFS and their plain nasty attacks on other Trans inclusionary feminists? Feminism is supposed to be about our sisterhood and supporting, sustaining and up lifting each other, not act like Burchill and all the others she encouraged to pile on.

10 replies, 2661 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 07:27 AM

1. Now, THAT'S how you apologize, even though she was probably forced to under a legal agreement.

I have no idea what this is about, but they sure are better at retracting defaming comments in the UK than they are here in the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to catbyte (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 07:50 AM

2. Repube apology: "I'm sorry if anyone was offended."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CurtEastPoint (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 07:51 AM

3. Exactly. That drives me up a wall. They might as well not even bother.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CurtEastPoint (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 08:12 AM

4. Yes. Delivered with a roll of the eyes. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to catbyte (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 09:07 AM

5. Google that story, Ash Sakar gave to The Guardian,

so much for the British tabloid press pretending they aren't racist. Burchill wants a book published, therefore the apology. Damn, we thought our press was bad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 10:36 AM

6. Ugh. I remember Burchill from reading New Musical Express in my teens.

She was a useless "journalist" then, all style (if you liked her schtick) and no substance, especially musically, and hasn't improved any with age.

FWIW, I'm not keen on the term "TERF". I mainly see it used on Twitter by men's rights activists who've latched onto the controversies around gender self-ID etc. and use it as hatespeak cover for often vicious and sometimes downright threatening verbal attacks on any women in their sights.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Emrys (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 12:49 PM

7. On the other hand, Burchill called herself a radical feminist for years, and also for years

has been extremely offensive to transgender people, and really did (and, I think, does) exclude them from being women. The term was practically invented for Burchill. For an example of a response to her offence, see eg, from 7 years ago, https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/03/11/columnist-julie-burchill-trans-women-just-big-white-blokes-cut-genitals-cant-call-women/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #7)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 05:34 PM

8. Burchill can call herself whatever she wants.

And I can choose to give her as scant attention as I did during my teens. Being offensive and often contrarian has been her route to fame, as it has for others, like Katie Hopkins.

As for the question of whether she sought to "exclude [transgender women] from being women", I'll have to bow to anyone who's paid attention to her.

Moving only too gladly on from Burchill, on my comments about the use of the word "TERF" and what too often accompanies it - an issue which quite surprisingly has divided online activists within the SNP for the last year or two (while, I suspect, not being a major focus for those who don't consider themselves online activists) - I'll rely on just one example among too many: MP Joanna Cherry. The controversy she became embroiled in concerned the Scottish Parliament's moves to change its Gender Recognition Act (GRA). From Wikipedia:

Position on gender issues

Cherry has signed the SNP Women's Pledge, which originated amongst members of the SNP but is not affiliated with it. The pledge, which has been criticised as transphobic by some SNP members, opposes a reform of the Gender Recognition Act in Scotland which would allow transgender people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate on the basis of a statutory declaration, rather than the existing Gender Recognition Panel system.

Cherry said there was a "big dose of misogyny" in the debate, saying that she approaches the issue "as a feminist" and has "never said that I was not in favour of trans rights." She said that the statement "women don't have penises" is an "undeniable biological fact". She has described the abuse she has faced.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joanna_Cherry


The whole saga around the GRA unfolded over many months. The split was between women (not necessarily identifying as feminists) who had absorbed an interpretation of the Act's reforms which wasn't entirely based in the reality of them, fearing it would lead to an erosion of women's hard fought for rights to women-only spaces (the reforms wouldn't have actually affected any rights in that respect), and those who gathered under the transgender rights banner, the most vocal of whom online (not necessarily transgender themselves) were too often disgustingly confrontational, misogynistic and violent in language, and on a few deplorable occasions, violent in real life.

The behaviour of one such miscreant, Grant Carte, came to light in court last week:

Man pleads guilty to sending 'threats of sexual violence' to SNP's Joanna Cherry
...
The court heard that Cherry had received a series of messages from a Twitter account named “Grant” on the day she was sacked from the SNP’s frontbench at Westminster.

Fiscal depute Callum Thomson told the court the messages warned the MP that she had “24 hours or I will f*** you like you f****d Scotland”.

The messages included an email and telephone number and told Cherry to “tell me something”, warning: “You don’t know me or what I’m capable of.”

Defence agent Simon Collins said Karte had been having “difficulties with his own life” at the time and was “apologetic and embarrassed”.

The sheriff said that Cherry had "inferred" threats of sexual harm from the messages, though Karte had said it was not his intent.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/19157798.man-pleads-guilty-sending-threats-sexual-violence-snps-joanna-cherry/


This is just the tip of the iceberg of some of the abuse, threats of violence and actual violence that's been dealt to those identified as "TERFS" online and offline in the last year or two, not just to Cherry (some of the abuse she's faced on Twitter alone I'd hesitate to reproduce here, but it includes threats of rape and disfigurement), but to many other women (and on the odd occasion men identified as "TERF sympathizers" ). A simple search on Twitter for the terms TERF and punch (or choose your own expression of violence) will illustrate what I'm talking about.

That's why I'm not happy with the term "TERF". It adds nothing to debate over what is a complex, nuanced and sensitive subject, and encourages those who just want to vent their anger in some way to identify a trendy enemy and let rip in whatever way they choose.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #7)

Tue Mar 16, 2021, 06:49 PM

9. If you look at her Twitter feed...

... It quickly becomes obvious that she has something of an obsession with trans folk, as in she feels a need to obsessively sneer at them.

She"s every bit as tiresome on that subject as Piers Morgan is over Megan Markle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Wed Mar 17, 2021, 10:33 AM

10. I have mostly managed to avoid Julie B. in recent years..

as shown by the fact that the things that have impressed me most (negatively) about her are that, despite being supposedly a leftie, she was quite keen on Maggie Thatcher and the Iraq war and not very fond of the Irish. Oh, and quite keen on hard drugs. But I have encountered a bit of her more recent obsession with trans people. I think that she's just a vile journalist of a certain generation - some got their start in student journalism; some in youth 'n music journalism; but they all ended up in the same nastiness-for-nastiness' sake category. There are similar types in younger generations, but they tend to stick to social media rather than combining it with print journalism. Or maybe I'm just becoming more successful in avoiding the gutter press.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread