Northern Gateway: The unlikely pipeline
The approval of Enbridges Northern Gateway pipeline by the National Energy Boards Joint Review Panel (JRP) landed with a dismal and predictable thud. It is a view that needs to be reviewed, an assessment that needs to be reassessed, a decision that still needs multiple other decisions. After weighing the evidence, the JRP announced with an unconvincing finality, we concluded that Canada and Canadians would be better off with the Northern Gateway Project than without it.
98% opposition ignored
The pronouncement is filled with ambiguities, uncertainties and deficiencies. What evidence was weighed that supported the JRPs conclusion? Of 1,179 oral submissions, 1,159 were opposed to the pipeline and the resulting supertankers. As noted by Stephen Hume in The Vancouver Sun, Scientists and environmentalists who wanted to address the hearings were excluded from the process by NEB fiat. The hearings did not consider upstream or downstream effects, except as economic factors but even these were only conjectural or likely.
As for being beneficial to Canada, it is a land mass, a geographical territory endowed with natural features that dont need scarring by pipelines, inevitable oil spills, threats to species and ecologies, wholesale removal of a non-renewable resource, massive environmental trauma from the tar sands development, not to mention additional greenhouse gases that are exacerbating climate change.
...more...
http://commonsensecanadian.ca/northern-gateway-unlikely-pipeline/