Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ananda

(28,854 posts)
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:29 PM May 2016

Uber-Lyft election!

So far it looks as if Uber and Lyft spent those millions
and made those illegal robocalls for nothing.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2016-05-07/prop-1-election-results/

Update 4, 8:03pm The hits keep coming for the Prop. 1 supporters. The first votes are in from election day, and with five precincts reporting, e-day results so far are 427 (37.72%) for, 62.28% against. That mean, overall, it's going down 43.84% to 56.16%.

Update 5, 8:10pm: The city has just released a statement from Mayor Steve Adler: "The people have spoken tonight loud and clear. Uber and Lyft are welcome to stay in Austin, and I invite them to the table regardless. Austin is an innovative and creative city, and we'll need to be at our most creative and innovative now."

However, in a show of corporate petulance, per the Austin-American Statesman, Uber is threatening to withdraw from Austin, starting Monday.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uber-Lyft election! (Original Post) ananda May 2016 OP
I voted this afternoon. griffi94 May 2016 #1
Wife and I voted FOR prop 1 metroins May 2016 #2
Would be interested to know why. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author metroins May 2016 #5
Thanks. I appreciate the information. SusanCalvin May 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author metroins May 2016 #7
Lyft sent an email out 20 minutes ago christx30 May 2016 #3
Glad it went down. I voted against it. hobbit709 May 2016 #8
The State of Texas already has fingerprinting set up for all persons employed by a public school DhhD May 2016 #9
We dodged one with Uber hobbit709 Jun 2016 #10
DUI arrests up since election WolverineDG Jun 2016 #11

Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #4)

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
6. Thanks. I appreciate the information.
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:29 AM
May 2016

What is Circle C?

I ask as a person considering a move to Austin - how are they fixed for high school Computer Science teachers? (Not in charter schools.)

Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #6)

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
8. Glad it went down. I voted against it.
Sun May 8, 2016, 06:37 AM
May 2016

tired of corporations wanting to tell governments what to do.

If Uber leaves, "Don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass"

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
9. The State of Texas already has fingerprinting set up for all persons employed by a public school
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:36 AM
May 2016

district. That includes contractors. Seems like it would be easy to work with government to set up fingerprinting with the online application. Too bad that millions of dollars were spent to stop background checks. Maybe the city could help lower the cost and hold a few Saturday clinics. Public school teachers and substitute teachers, pay the cost of fingerprinting for themselves upon arriving for the procedure, at an appointment. Fingerprinting means that there is an electronic data connection with the FBI.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Uber-Lyft election!