Tue Feb 28, 2012, 04:56 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
New interim maps for Texas
|
17 replies, 3555 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
sonias | Feb 2012 | OP |
northoftheborder | Feb 2012 | #1 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #2 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #3 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #4 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2012 | #5 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #6 | |
susanr516 | Feb 2012 | #8 | |
syberlion | Feb 2012 | #7 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2012 | #10 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #14 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #11 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2012 | #9 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #12 | |
sonias | Feb 2012 | #13 | |
Gothmog | Mar 2012 | #15 | |
sonias | Mar 2012 | #16 | |
onestepforward | Mar 2012 | #17 |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:36 PM
northoftheborder (7,402 posts)
1. Ridiculous.
![]() |
Response to northoftheborder (Reply #1)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:39 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
2. We're screwed.
![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:51 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
3. San Antonio court releases redistricting map for U.S. House
Postcards from the Lege blog AAS 2/28/12
San Antonio court releases redistricting map for U.S. House A federal court in San Antonio has released redistricting maps for the U.S. House and Texas House. The interim congressional map shows that Travis County will have five congressional districts up from the current three. One of them, District 35, will be anchored in Bexar County. U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, is expected to run in District 35. Doggett has said in the past that he would abandon his current Congressional District 25 if it ended up looking like the Republican district that was envisioned by the GOP-controlled Legislature last session. District 35 was proposed originally by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund to be a district in which Latinos could elect the candidate of their choosing. It's Doggett vs Castro once again. They've pitted us against each other again. ![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:53 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
4. Court Delivers Election Maps for Texas House, Congress
Texas Tribune 2/28/12
Court Delivers Election Maps for Texas House, Congress Now there are maps. Federal judges in San Antonio unveiled maps for the state's congressional delegation and for the state House this afternoon, and they did it in time to allow the state to hold its delayed political primaries on May 29. The court also signed off on Senate plans agreed to earlier this month. (snip) Barring appeals, these maps will be used for the 2012 elections. Below are the new maps. We'll fill in details throughout the afternoon. The Trib has much clearer quick view maps to get a perspective on the Congressional districts. ![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:57 PM
Gothmog (111,615 posts)
5. These maps are horrible
From what I have seen, these maps are horrible. I am still hoping that the DOJ will refuse to preclear these maps. These are the maps of the State of Texas and so need to be pre-cleared by the DOJ
|
Response to Gothmog (Reply #5)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 09:17 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
6. I'll hope with you
Really these maps stink.
Lone Star Project's take on them Lone Star Project February 28, 2012 (703) 589-5509 - Fax (202) 547- 8258 Contact: Matt Angle Court Releases Interim Redistricting Plans Plan includes new North Texas minority opportunity congressional district, does not include Travis County-based district Earlier today, the Federal District Court in San Antonio released the interim maps to be used for the 2012 elections in Texas. The court’s congressional map (Plan C235) appears to be nearly identical to a compromise plan agreed to by the Latino Task Force and Texas Republicans. The interim plan is a victory for African American and Hispanic voters in North Texas. New District 33 is a coalition district that includes the core African American and Hispanic neighborhoods in Tarrant County and then extends east into Dallas County to include Hispanic neighborhoods in Oak Cliff and parts of Grand Prairie and Irving. The turnout in Democratic primaries favors Tarrant County. The new congressional district includes most of the State House District of Representative Marc Veasey. Veasey is expected to run for the seat and should be considered the early favorite. Outside of North Texas, the interim plan does not reflect the population growth of Hispanics and African Americans in Texas. While new District 35 is created and extends from Austin to San Antonio, it is offset by the dismantling of Travis County-based District 25 which is converted from a minority crossover district to a safe Anglo Republican District. New District 34 based in Cameron County is offset by the loss of District 27 from a Latino opportunity district to a Anglo Republican-controlled District. The Latino voting strength in San Antonio/West Texas District 23 is also reduced. However Democrats are fielding a very strong candidate in State Representative Pete Gallego, so he can likely win disproportionate support from some Anglo voters and defeat Republican incumbent Francisco Canseco. Most of the plaintiff groups who challenged the Republican congressional plan hoped for a better interim map. These hopes were undermined, however, when Congressman Henry Cuellar and one of the Latino plaintiff groups – the Latino Task Force – agreed to a compromise proposal that gave up at least three, and perhaps all four, of the additional Texas seats to the Republicans. Next month, the Federal District Court in Washington, DC is expected to release its decision detailing all of the violations in the State’s originally enacted redistricting plan. Ultimately, the DC Court’s decision will guide the redrawing of new maps when the Legislature meets again in 2013. Here is a breakdown of the Districts under the Court’s plan where minority voters can elect their candidate of choice: CD 9 – Al Green , Houston – African American Opportunity District CD15 – Ruben Hinojosa, Hidalgo County – Hispanic Opportunity District CD16 – Silvestre Reyes, El Paso – Hispanic Opportunity District CD18 – Sheila Jackson Lee, Houston – African American Opportunity District CD20 – Charlie Gonzalez, San Antonio – Hispanic Opportunity District CD23 – Francisco Canseco, San Antonio/West Texas – Marginalized Hispanic Opportunity District* CD28 – Henry Cuellar, Laredo – Hispanic Opportunity District CD29 – Gene Green, Houston – Hispanic Opportunity District CD30 – Eddie Bernice Johnson, Dallas – African American Opportunity District CD33 – New Open, Fort Worth/Dallas – Minority Coalition District CD34 – New Open, Cameron County – Hispanic Opportunity District CD35 – New Open, Austin/San Antonio – Hispanic Opportunity District *The Court’s interim plan reduces the Latino voting strength in CD23 below the level of the benchmark plan, but strong Democratic candidate Pete Gallego should be able to claim the district against Republican Francisco Canseco. Comments by Lone Star Project Director Matt Angle: The court’s map is good news for North Texas, especially Fort Worth. Tarrant County minority voters will finally have a chance to elect a responsible representative to Congress in new District 33. The plan is not particularly good news for minority voters outside of North Texas. Minority voters in Austin, Corpus Christi and in San Antonio lost ground. New District 33 in North Texas is the only real new minority opportunity district. Everywhere else in the State, the new minority districts simply replace existing districts where minority voters elect their candidate of choice. ![]() |
Response to Gothmog (Reply #5)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 11:28 PM
susanr516 (1,425 posts)
8. Agreed, horrible.
I'm in Nueces County. The DOJ specifically mentioned CD 27 as cracking majority Hispanic Nueces County away from the RGV and stranding 200,000 minority voters in a district that removed their ability to elect the Congressman of their choice--and the interim map puts us right back into a very similar district--combined minority VAP of 50.4%. Not a snowball's chance in Hades of electing a minority choice candidate.
Same thing in the House. The DOJ specifically mentioned the removal of HD 33 from Nueces County as demonstrating a pattern and intent to discriminate against Hispanics--a Hispanic Republican won a majority Hispanic district in 2010--the Lege leaves both the Anglo reps and removes the seat held by the Hispanic. Every map since then has included HD 33 in it--until today. Poof! HD 33 is gone. Seems like any Hispanic living south of I-10 is screwed--again. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:43 PM
syberlion (136 posts)
7. Comment I posted to AAS article
It would be a nice change if redistricting was taken out of the hands of both parties. Base it on just the numbers, population distribution, period. Each party is so afraid of losing power, not afraid of properly representing the people of a particular region.
It's a game to the career politicians and those whose money buying into the "game" of politics. As long as the money is leading the politicians by the nose, we all lose. It's about holding power and it should be about proper representation, period. Get the money out. I contend the average Texan across the whole state is not represented, but the monied interests are. All this gerrymandering is for the benefit of those not wanting the average Texan to have a voice in this government. Fine. Keep voting against your own best interests and when you find yourself as one of millions of cancer-clusters, just remember to die quickly on the republican health care plan. |
Response to syberlion (Reply #7)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 09:57 AM
Gothmog (111,615 posts)
10. California's approach is interesting
California took redistricting away from the legislature and the results appear to be better maps
|
Response to Gothmog (Reply #10)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:09 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
14. I would love to see a more non partisan committee take this up
There have been repeated attempts to introduce a bill for a redistricting committee (State Senator Jeff Wentworth). But they never went anywhere. The Lege is all about reelecting themselves. They would never trust anyone else to make that decision. And never mind that any committee formed in this current climate would still be 99.9% republican.
![]() |
Response to syberlion (Reply #7)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 12:26 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
11. Nice comment
Good for you!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 09:55 AM
Gothmog (111,615 posts)
9. Maps are subject to Section 5 preclearance
I was happy to see that my gut reaction was correct and these maps are indeed subject to preclearance by the DOJ and/or the courts http://txredistricting.org/post/18488718643/q-a-on-the-new-interim-maps
Do the new interim maps need to be precleared under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act? I am hoping that the Democratic party will oppose the preclearance of these maps. I will be happy to miss the May 29 primary date in order to get good maps. |
Response to Gothmog (Reply #9)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:47 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
12. Me too - pass on the May 29th date
Lets get better maps. I am concerned however that DOJ will just pre-clear them.
![]() |
Response to Gothmog (Reply #9)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:01 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
13. Parties tell D.C. court ruling is needed to correct interim maps
Texas Redistricting blog 2/289/12
Parties tell D.C. court ruling is needed to correct interim maps Intervenors in the preclearance case told the D.C. court this morning that the interim maps adopted by the San Antonio court “perpetuate[ed] many of the Section 5 violations identified” in the D.C. case and said the those defects “heighten[ed] the need for a ruling by this Court that denies preclearance” of both the congressional and state house maps. They told the court that such a ruling would allow the San Antonio court to put in place “a more comprehensive remedy for violation of the voting rights of blacks and Hispanics throughout the state.” The advisory was signed on behalf of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, NAACP, LULAC, the Davis intervenors, and the Gonzales (Travis County) intervenors. ![]() ![]() |
Response to sonias (Original post)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 10:50 PM
Gothmog (111,615 posts)
15. Intervenors in D.C. case respond to Latino Task Force
The Latino Task Force has sold out other latino groups and the Democratic Party. The Intervenors in D.C. case filed a good advisory today taking issue with the claims of the latino task force and pointing out how the interim maps screw minorities http://txredistricting.org/post/18582191838/intervenors-in-d-c-case-respond-to-latino-task-force
This afternoon, the NAACP, LULAC, Texas Legislative Black Caucus, State Sen. Wendy Davis, and Travis Co. intervenors told the D.C. court that the Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force’s description of its compromise with the State of Texas was “erroneous.” Abbott was able to get one group of plaintiffs to go along with the intentional discrimination by making changes that hurts blacks but helps one hispanic congresscritter. It is sad to think that Abbott is going to win by dividing the plaintiffs and the San Antonio court did not stand up to this crap. Hopefully the DC court will step in and corrrect this mess |
Response to Gothmog (Reply #15)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 11:08 PM
sonias (18,063 posts)
16. Who is in the Latino Task Force?
The only group I can think of that is not mentioned in the Intervenors is MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund).
![]() |
Response to Gothmog (Reply #15)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 11:48 PM
onestepforward (3,691 posts)
17. An email from LULAC this evening
"Despite clear and convincing evidence and testimony by numerous expert witnesses over many months; the court drawn maps released yesterday do not go far enough to protect the voting rights of the three million Latinos living in Texas,” said LULAC National President Margaret Moran. “It’s clear that the intent of the Legislature was to disenfranchise Latino voters across the state by denying us the opportunity to elect the candidates of our choice. Because of the Voting Rights Act, we were able to intervene and fight for fair representation.”
The U.S. 2010 Census made it clear that the demographic population shift in Texas was a direct result of the over 80 percent minority growth with the overwhelming majority being Latinos. The Texas Legislature used racial bias and discriminatory practices in drawing the original redistricting maps. While the interim map does provide for two new majority-minority districts in Texas, certain aspects of the map compromise key majority-minority districts in the state. With the creation of Congressional District 35, the Latino community was provided with an opportunity to elect a candidate of our choice. However, the interim maps continue to divide communities across the Southside of Bexar County into four (4) congressional districts, and Travis County is divided into five (5) congressional districts. “Obviously the interim maps need more work! We hope that the D.C. Court will deny Texas preclearance,” stated Ms. Moran. “LULAC will continue to fight for a redistricting map that fully reflects the growth of the Texas Latino population.” Section Five of the Voting Rights Act requires that legislative-drawn maps be pre-cleared by the Department of Justice before they are put into effect. The interim state maps must still be pre-cleared, before they can go into effect and be used in the 2012 election." |