Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 10:49 AM Jan 2014

Corbett wasting more $ on fracking appeal, says envi protections must be killed if decision stands

http://marcellusmonitor.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/pa-puc-dep-seek-to-overturn-supreme-court-act-13-decision/

Recently, the PA. Supreme Court found that one of Corbett's crowning achievements was unconstitutional. This was Act 13 of 2012, which ordered municipalities to not regulate the fracking industry. For example, municipalities could not keep new wells out of highly residential areas, and had to allow other gas industry facilities in many locations. (It had already established that municipalities could not regulate operational matters that the State already regulated.)

Now, Corbett is using tax dollars to hire an outside law firm to try to convince the Supreme Court they were wrong. These reconsiderations almost always fail - I have only heard of one time it worked, and that was years ago when the Supreme Court did a major screwup on historic preservation. They do churn lots of fees for law firms.

Corbett's filing also says that the Court could not overturn the municipal pre-emption without also eliminating the additional environmental protections that were written into the law. For example, there are larger setbacks for wells from waterways.

Attyn. Gen. Kane was also sued by the municipalities as part of the original challenge, but she declined to defend the limits on municipal regulation of fracking.

What is also interesting is that some of the townships who are most affected by this law and who sued Corbett to overturn it involve very Republican suburbs.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corbett wasting more $ on fracking appeal, says envi protections must be killed if decision stands (Original Post) JPZenger Jan 2014 OP
Greed and money packman Jan 2014 #1
You make a good point. blue neen Jan 2014 #2
Big business vs. the locals has always been a problem, Curmudgeoness Jan 2014 #3
If a township or municipality receives money from impact fees, blue neen Jan 2014 #4
Well, let's hope that he is a loser. Curmudgeoness Jan 2014 #5
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
1. Greed and money
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 11:57 AM
Jan 2014

all those municipalities want their thumbs in the pie. In Pennsylvania you have more divisions of government than existed in any feudal state - towns, municipalities, townships, boroughs, unincorporated areas, etc. Each one with elected officials that are drolling to get into the pot of money with its kickbacks, bribes and payoffs. I can see Corbett wanting to give some sense to this mess, but at the same time he's a tool of the gas industry. Pennsylvania has always had the problem of big industry vs. the locals.

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
2. You make a good point.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 07:12 PM
Jan 2014

I also think, though, that municipalities don't want to leave all of the decisions strictly up to the frackers.
That's how Governor Gashole set it up with Act 13...the people being affected the most have the least say-so.

Tom Corbett has been the ruination of Pennsylvania in only 3 short years.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
3. Big business vs. the locals has always been a problem,
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 08:59 PM
Jan 2014

but I believe that local control over zoning issues (which is what this is all about) is the best place for it. First, no one cares as much about the town as the people of the town. Certainly Harrisburg could care less. Also, local government officials are people we can talk to, who we can have some influence on. They care about what the people think more than someone who will never even see your town.

Besides, feudal government wasn't much to brag about.

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
4. If a township or municipality receives money from impact fees,
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jan 2014

Act 13 even goes so far as to restrict what the local governments can spend the money on-----and Republicans are always complaining about government overreach! Priceless, huh?

The fact that Republican Tom Corbett is proud of Act 13 just shows what a loser he really is.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
5. Well, let's hope that he is a loser.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jan 2014

I can't take a second term. Neither can PA.

And as to the Republicans and their lip service to government overreach, that only applies to anything that is good for the people. They don't see it as overreach if it benefits corporations and money-grubbers.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Corbett wasting more $ on...