Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,089 posts)
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 03:43 PM Mar 2015

California Activist Responds To 'Kill Gays' Ballot Initiative With 'Intolerant Jackass Act'

Earlier this month we told you about the "Sodomite Suppression Act," the disgusting proposed ballot initiative in California calling for gays to be "put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.”

The initiative is the work of attorney Matthew McLaughlin, who paid the $200 fee and submitted his proposal to the attorney general's office. The Los Angeles Times reports that due to California's loose rules for ballot initiatives, officials are virtually powerless to stop the measure from proceeding to the signature-gathering process.

In order to qualify for the ballot, the initiative would need 365,000 signatures in 180 days, which The LA Times calls "a high bar even for well-financed efforts." And even if McLaughlin's initiative were to qualify for the ballot and be approved by voters, courts would almost certainly strike it down as unconstitutional.

From The LA Times:

McLaughlin's proposal calls same-sex intimacy "a monstrous evil" and says it would be better for gay people to die than for Californians to "be killed by God's just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst."

It also would make the spreading of "sodomistic propaganda" punishable by a $1-million fine, 10 years in jail or deportation from the state. And it would ban gay people from holding public office.


The Sodomite Suppression Act has sparked debate about whether California should reform its initiative process, and one bill in the Legislature would increase the filing fee from $200 to $8,000.

Read more: http://www.towleroad.com/2015/03/california-activist-responds-to-kill-the-gays-initiative-with-intolerant-jackass-act.html#.VRGwcKIqN_A.twitter

Cross-posted in the LGBT Group.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Activist Responds To 'Kill Gays' Ballot Initiative With 'Intolerant Jackass Act' (Original Post) TexasTowelie Mar 2015 OP
The Intolerant Jackass Act has a good chance of passage Warpy Mar 2015 #1
I'm disappointed in that response tularetom Mar 2015 #2
I wish they'd use a filter other than money, though daredtowork Mar 2015 #3

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
2. I'm disappointed in that response
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 03:50 PM
Mar 2015

I thought the "Intolerant Jackass Act" might allow us to shoot intolerant jackasses.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
3. I wish they'd use a filter other than money, though
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:06 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Fri Mar 27, 2015, 08:19 PM - Edit history (1)

Isn't raising the price on referendums just making money equal speech?Rich jackasses outnumber the poor ones, so raising the cash bar doesn't accomplish much.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California Activist Respo...