Pistol-Whipped Customer Can't Ruffle KFC in Court

[douglas9]

PHILADELPHIA (CN) - KFC is not liable to a customer who was pistol-whipped by the cashier while mulling which side dishes to get with his chicken special, a federal judge ruled.
Edward Harris says he ordered a 10-piece bucket of chicken at a KFC in Philadelphia on Oct. 3, 2007, but had not decided what sides to get along with the biscuits.
Another cashier, Michael Henry, then interrupted the order and told Harris to "hurry up," according to Harris' deposition testimony.
Harris says he replied, "No, I am not dealing with you," but that the employee who had been taking his order backed away when the altercation became more heated.
Henry asked, "Well, do you want the fucking chicken or not," then muttered, "I will kick your ass," according to the deposition.
Harris says Henry then took out a gun and held it under the countertop.
The customer allegedly reacted by throwing up his hands, saying, "What? You going to shoot me over a bucket of chicken?"
As Harris headed for the exit, however, he turned around, and Henry hit him in the face with the gun.
Harris says he lost consciousness, broke his wrist, and needed eight stitches in the lip.
He sued KFC in September 2009, claiming the restaurant chain negligently hired Henry.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/22/47723.htm

[cliffordu]

1. Customers are NUMBER ONE!!!!

"Well, do you want the fucking chicken or not?" then muttered, "I will kick your ass,"

[Ikonoklast]

2. Fried Chicken Nazi.

It's one thing not being allowed to order soup by The Soup Nazi because you weren't ready to order, but at least he didn't pistol-whip you on the way out.

[elleng]

3. Legal nit-picking here but

customer/counsel chose the wrong Cause of Action. Feels like counsel was trying to get into KFC's deep pockets, instead of being reasonable. AND made a FEDERAL CASE out of it!

He sued KFC in September 2009, claiming the restaurant chain negligently hired Henry.
Had KFC done a criminal background check on Henry, it would have discovered arrests and convictions for possession of firearms, burglary, robbery and theft, Harris claimed.
But U.S. District Judge Lawrence Stengel sided with KFC at summary judgment this week.
"KFC would not have been aware of Henry's propensity for violence even if it had a duty to conduct a background check," the decision states.

Maybe sue them for bad acts of their agent, the cashier, but for negligently hiring him? Don't think so.

[HopeHoops]

4. I keep telling you all that fast food is bad for you.

[mysuzuki2]

5. as if we needed another reason not to eat at KFC

[jmowreader]

6. KFC is a franchising company, so suing the parent company is the wrong thing to do

I would have recommended suing whoever owns the KFC he got pistol-whipped in for failure to prevent Michael Henry from bringing a gun to work.