Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumFrom Crooks and Liars John Stossel: Just Because I Take FEMA Money Is No Reason Not To Abolish It
Could there be anything more hypocritical than libertarian John Stossel going on Fox and vehemently attacking FEMA at the same time that he admits having taken money from them three times after his pricey beach house was damaged in a storm? But then again, hypocrisy is a specialty on Fox News.
Stossel explained that he justified building his beachfront house by saying he couldnt lose cause theres this thing called federal flood insurance and the premiums are cheap. Without sounding a bit remorseful, he said, Im ashamed, Im guilty
The basement was gone (in a previous storm). You paid for a new basement, I never invited you there but you paid for it anyway. It went out again, you paid again. The whole house went, you covered the house. This is a program that encourages relatively affluent people to build in danger
Stop rewarding people for taking foolish risks.
I couldnt help but notice that he didnt mention a thing about his house being damaged by Sandy. So it seems that Stossels newly-found dislike of FEMA likely came at a time when only other people want to utilize it.
Ailes-mouthpiece Peter Johnson, Jr. argued strenuously on behalf of FEMA. But with a lower-third banner such as WELFARE FOR REPAIRS and other Fox segments casting doubt on it, you have to wonder if Ailes is trying to have it both ways: applauding the program in the middle of a disaster and setting the stage for Romney or Republicans to defund what has long been a favorite Fox target.
http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/11/from-crooks-and-liars-john-stossel-just.html
marble falls
(56,996 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)even keep his mouth shut. He didn't have to take unwanted help from the US government for a damn thing. And this is the kind of ass who will rave about people who desperately do need help. Karma, where are you?