Kyle Rittenhouse Prosecutors Missed THIS Key Piece Of Evidence

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

[liberalla]

1. Yes, that would have been helpful, but now....

it's too late. Maybe it will be helpful in any civil case brought against him.

[llashram]

2. this was one

hell of a sham trial. Judge, jury, prosecutor. all

[calguy]

3. I have to think the prosecution was working with the defense

Sure seems like they deliberately threw the case.

[bucolic_frolic]

4. wow that's a new thought

Do prosecutors align themselves with public opinion in the communities they serve, or do they go along to get along? They'd be none too popular if they had won their case. Of course what sort of experience and talent can you find for high level cases in small towns and cities? So there are reasons that might support your idea. Thanks for posting!

[thatdemguy]

5. One thing I dont understand

Is why the prosecution bypassed the grand jury.

As for the video, there would be many ways to prevent it from being entered into evidence, one being you cant see who is talking. Sure you could try to bring in the person who recorded it, but still very hard to introduce it in to evidence.

Also the gun charge due to the way the law is worded, it did not apply to the case.

There where many things screwed up in this case.

[Blue Owl]

6. Kyle Rottenhouse is the key piece of shit

Lock him up.

[Bayard]

7. One thing I've been wondering about.....

Was the jury threatened, or did they feel like they would be, by the hordes of lunatic fringe?

[WHITT]

8. I Don't Think The Prosecution

was prepared for the judge to be part of the defense team.

[Dr. Strange]

9. I don't understand, what evidence is she talking about?

Is it the CVS video? Because the prosecutor absolutely tried to enter that into evidence.