Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow - Romney's silence on security leaves duty unfulfilled (Original Post) Galraedia Sep 2012 OP
Excellent piece, Rachel! gateley Sep 2012 #1
Watch it on her site stopwastingmymoney Sep 2012 #2
If it were anybody but Mitt, a candidate could make a rebound on getting the troops out of .... marble falls Sep 2012 #3
one criticism on her statistics central scrutinizer Sep 2012 #4

gateley

(62,683 posts)
1. Excellent piece, Rachel!
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:43 AM
Sep 2012

And again, I just can't stop myself from thinking "I wish Obama would have listened to Biden."

marble falls

(57,077 posts)
3. If it were anybody but Mitt, a candidate could make a rebound on getting the troops out of ....
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:42 AM
Sep 2012

Afghanistan and maybe get some traction from it for other issues on that stand alone. But not Romney and his Teabilly supporters. How in the world does a guy so clueless about how the Federal gov't works get so far into an election?????

And the "anonymous" holdout in the Senate, he can be identified easily enough. Someone else knows who he is, he is part of some sort of machinations by the GOP for some sort of ends.

central scrutinizer

(11,648 posts)
4. one criticism on her statistics
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:44 AM
Sep 2012

With more troops in Afghanistan, the NUMBER of attacks might have gone up simply because there were more targets. A better statistic would have been the RATE of attacks. Something like number of soldiers per attack.

It is like saying you should buy a neon purple car because they are involved in the FEWEST number of accidents. It's because there are almost no cars like that on the road. What is the rate or percentage of cars involved in accidents is a better measure.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Rachel Maddow - Romney's ...