Tue Sep 4, 2018, 10:10 AM
EarlG (16,177 posts)
15 replies, 2675 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
EarlG | Sep 2018 | OP |
madaboutharry | Sep 2018 | #1 | |
Initech | Sep 2018 | #3 | |
world wide wally | Sep 2018 | #2 | |
Initech | Sep 2018 | #4 | |
joet67 | Sep 2018 | #5 | |
SummerSnow | Sep 2018 | #6 | |
Gothmog | Sep 2018 | #7 | |
kimbutgar | Sep 2018 | #8 | |
sandensea | Sep 2018 | #9 | |
Hortensis | Sep 2018 | #12 | |
sandensea | Sep 2018 | #13 | |
Hortensis | Sep 2018 | #14 | |
sandensea | Sep 2018 | #15 | |
cstanleytech | Sep 2018 | #10 | |
Beartracks | Sep 2018 | #11 |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 10:21 AM
madaboutharry (29,507 posts)
1. Grassley claimed the republicans read them all!
But came in this morning looking like they got 8 hours of sleep. Frauds, every one of them.
|
Response to madaboutharry (Reply #1)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 10:36 AM
Initech (74,004 posts)
3. Grassley claimed the republicans (sh)read them all!
Fixed it for you!
![]() |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 10:30 AM
world wide wally (15,035 posts)
2. Gee, another example of fraud
This is what Trump and his accomplices thrive on.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 10:39 AM
Initech (74,004 posts)
4. Kavanaugh is a Clinton hating scumbag. He should not be there.
![]() |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 11:06 AM
joet67 (555 posts)
5. Jimmy Hoffa's body? nt
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 11:10 AM
SummerSnow (11,990 posts)
6. Smh, why did they (dems) even show up to the hearings?
The whole thing was rigged and they have the votes anyway. On Morning Joe, Scarborough said they should not show and just hold a press conference, put the documents online and say exactly what the Repubs did.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 12:19 PM
kimbutgar (9,952 posts)
8. Ghastly just said they reviewed these documents overnight
What a pile of shit that man is. Gasbag is a frickin lying traitor and I hope karma does him justice one day.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 12:25 PM
sandensea (7,062 posts)
9. They're no doubt mostly Bush-era documents.
In other words, a veritable crime scene.
No wonder they're so desperate to hide them. |
Response to sandensea (Reply #9)
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 04:13 AM
Hortensis (28,365 posts)
12. Yes, his time in the WH. Plus, though, who knows
from other years? He's an extremist of bad character. Interesting how often those go together.
|
Response to Hortensis (Reply #12)
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 11:10 AM
sandensea (7,062 posts)
13. My guess is that a lot of those show Kavanagh rationalizing any and every Bush brain fart
Up to and including perpetuating himself in power by way of a continuity-of-government declaration had Ken Blackwell's heist in ohio not worked in '04.
It would, of course, have basically been third world-style martial law. But Bush - unlike Cheeto - was a stickler about having a patina of legality on every unconstitutional "signing statement" of his (I'm not sure which is worse). All those legal contortions must have kept Kavanagh, Yoo, Addington, and the rest of them very busy. |
Response to sandensea (Reply #13)
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 11:29 AM
Hortensis (28,365 posts)
14. Yes. That one meeting the WaPo reported back in 2009
supposedly had Kavanaugh saying that his "mentor" Justice Kennedy would not go along with some extremely unconstitutional action being considered, forget which at the moment. So, if true, and it very likely is, these guys were deep into deciding on what deeds they could get away with at that point, and they trusted Kavanaugh enough to involve him in discussions they had to keep very quiet.
No surprise. Anyone who was an enthusiastic predator in the Ken Starr swiftboating "investigation" is de facto proven to be of extremely bad character, a proper fit for that group, and the very opposite of the judicial temperament every judge must have, or else ![]() |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 06:30 PM
cstanleytech (17,252 posts)
10. Like I have said because of the BS the Repugnants have been playing with stacking SCOTUS I think
the only remedy will be to increase the number of justices once we regain the majority as well as the Whitehouse and I am not talking about packing the new slots with partisan hacks like the Repugnants have been packing it with but rather with actual moderate justices.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Tue Sep 4, 2018, 09:23 PM
Beartracks (8,185 posts)
11. But if you complain about this obvious political move, *you're* the one being political!!
Republican "logic."
========= |