Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

celtics23

(890 posts) Fri Aug 17, 2012, 02:05 PM Aug 2012

How Progressives Should Address Family Research Council Shooting

From: www.davidpakman.com

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Progressives Should Address Family Research Council Shooting (Original Post) celtics23 Aug 2012 OP

DP's articulate, as always. These shooters seem to fit a similar physical pattern. Sad. freshwest Aug 2012 #1

I don't agree that progressive or liberals are burdened with opining closeupready Aug 2012 #2

LOL. 'Pet election' RZM Aug 2012 #3

The answer is simple - we should be honest. He's as much a terrorist as the wingnut shooters. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #4

freshwest

(53,661 posts)

1. DP's articulate, as always. These shooters seem to fit a similar physical pattern. Sad.

Reply to celtics23 (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2012, 02:36 PM

Aug 2012

closeupready

(29,503 posts)

2. I don't agree that progressive or liberals are burdened with opining

Reply to celtics23 (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2012, 03:07 PM

Aug 2012

about this guy's motives or statements, whatever they are.

RZM

(8,556 posts)

3. LOL. 'Pet election'

Reply to celtics23 (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2012, 03:32 PM

Aug 2012

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

4. The answer is simple - we should be honest. He's as much a terrorist as the wingnut shooters.

Reply to celtics23 (Original post)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 12:19 PM

Aug 2012

Yes, he did it on "our side" of the issue, but he's still a terrorist and no different from the wingnuts other than his being in the minority as far as political terrorists are concerned.

Reply to this discussion