Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts) Fri Apr 7, 2017, 12:30 PM Apr 2017

Syria Strike Puts Bashar al-Assad, Russia On Notice

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Syria Strike Puts Bashar al-Assad, Russia On Notice (Original Post) L. Coyote Apr 2017 OP

Hardly lies Apr 2017 #1

Must be a pander to the Wellstone ruled Apr 2017 #2

We put them on notice, alright, but BEFORE we struck! angstlessk Apr 2017 #3

the spokespuppets of this administration heaven05 Apr 2017 #4

lies

(315 posts)

1. Hardly

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Fri Apr 7, 2017, 12:35 PM

Apr 2017

The US hasn't stopped him from doing anything.

The policy is:

FIRST Compelled destroy ISIS
SECOND Stabilize Syria
THIRD Try and create a coalition and somehow remove Assad

The message we sent was, "we're posturing and not much else".

And considering our current behavior in other places, Assad knows we don't really care about dead kids. That's just for the cameras.

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

2. Must be a pander to the

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Fri Apr 7, 2017, 01:05 PM

Apr 2017

35%. You got to be serious!

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)

3. We put them on notice, alright, but BEFORE we struck!

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Fri Apr 7, 2017, 01:20 PM

Apr 2017

what kinda notice is THAT?

heaven05

(18,124 posts)

4. the spokespuppets of this administration

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 10:53 AM

Apr 2017

are always so serious looking in 'protecting' our way of life with LIES that will eventually kill us all. New coalition being formed by boy-potus and his WH cohorts in crime?

Reply to this discussion