Rachel Maddow: To Diagnose the Russian Problem And To Fix It Is Not The Same Thing.
Last edited Wed Mar 1, 2017, 07:36 PM - Edit history (3)
This is too relevant to not bear repeating, because its conflict of interest ethics and U.S. national security implications seem complicated.
Maddow provides background on how and why the Trump administration might give Putin parts of the Ukraine and stop being mad about his invasions of old U.S.S.R. lands.
Maddow summarizes the ducking and dodging and lying historical context that keeps a potential evidence trail from being complete in making a case for treason against Trump or his "associates."
She asks, after this recount: Why is the president's personal lawyer involved in these proceedings? And why is ex-felon Sater working in the White House for Trump, after all his previous Russian business dealings?
I still don't know what the Austrian court's ruling was on Dmitri Furtash.
GOP non-support for this inquiry reports through mainstream media that there's nothing to see, and ultimately that Congressional investigations won't turn up anything. So Sessions won't have anything to recuse himself about.
By even the "appearance" of any standard of ethics and leadership conduct, we need to press for this to go as far as the law allows for the sake of our national security.
= new reply since forum marked as read
