Sat May 28, 2016, 11:56 AM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
Trump's use of hypnotic languageAfter viewing Bernie's interview on Maher last night I was intrigued by Scott Adams analysis of Trump's language, I had thought the same thing before ever seeing this, mostly because of Trump's repetitive use of the same phrases in virtually every speech.
|
76 replies, 8249 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | OP |
zebonaut | May 2016 | #1 | |
TryLogic | May 2016 | #21 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | May 2016 | #52 | |
13Dogs | May 2016 | #57 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | May 2016 | #64 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | May 2016 | #73 | |
CentralMass | May 2016 | #76 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #2 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #4 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #39 | |
Jesus Malverde | May 2016 | #74 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2016 | #7 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #13 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #15 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #20 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #24 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #28 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #33 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #36 | |
TryLogic | May 2016 | #25 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #31 | |
ToxMarz | May 2016 | #32 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2016 | #38 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #41 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2016 | #44 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2016 | #45 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2016 | #46 | |
valerief | May 2016 | #40 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #43 | |
basselope | May 2016 | #50 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #58 | |
basselope | May 2016 | #59 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #63 | |
valerief | May 2016 | #53 | |
bjobotts | May 2016 | #69 | |
Major Nikon | May 2016 | #70 | |
ancianita | May 2016 | #3 | |
Jim__ | May 2016 | #5 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #6 | |
ancianita | May 2016 | #17 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #19 | |
PSPS | May 2016 | #8 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #11 | |
ancianita | May 2016 | #18 | |
Hiraeth | May 2016 | #9 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #12 | |
Hiraeth | May 2016 | #14 | |
Soxfan58 | May 2016 | #10 | |
d_legendary1 | May 2016 | #16 | |
passiveporcupine | May 2016 | #55 | |
Perseus | May 2016 | #22 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #30 | |
Perseus | May 2016 | #71 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #72 | |
Cryptoad | May 2016 | #23 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #26 | |
Cryptoad | May 2016 | #27 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | May 2016 | #60 | |
Cryptoad | May 2016 | #67 | |
underpants | May 2016 | #29 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #34 | |
Laughing Mirror | May 2016 | #35 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #37 | |
Laughing Mirror | May 2016 | #42 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #48 | |
Laughing Mirror | May 2016 | #56 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #61 | |
Octafish | May 2016 | #47 | |
Uncle Joe | May 2016 | #49 | |
Octafish | May 2016 | #51 | |
RKP5637 | May 2016 | #54 | |
Lodestar | May 2016 | #62 | |
jimmyzvoice | May 2016 | #65 | |
Bigredhunk | May 2016 | #66 | |
dembotoz | May 2016 | #68 | |
Jesus Malverde | May 2016 | #75 |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:01 PM
zebonaut (3,688 posts)
1. This is why Trump will TROUNCE Hillary unless Dems nominate BERNIE SANDERS
Last edited Sat May 28, 2016, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1) PLEASE WAKE UP SUPERDELAGATES!! BERNIE WILL WIN! HILLARY WILL LOSE!
HELLO? ANYBODY HOME??????? |
Response to zebonaut (Reply #1)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:54 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
52. You're calling for the superdelegates to defy the will of the people?
How democratic of you.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #52)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:30 PM
13Dogs (45 posts)
57. The will of the people is already being defied
My understanding is Bernie has one 46% of the pledged delegates and Hillary has won 54% based on the primaries and caucuses, in your terms the will of the people. Now tell me, do we have the same proportional breakdown of superdelegates? Shouldn't Bernie also have 46% of the superdelegates if he's won 46% of the regular delegates? If not then the will of the people is being subverted by the Democratic Party, so your comment makes zero sense.
|
Response to 13Dogs (Reply #57)
Sat May 28, 2016, 05:22 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
64. In your scenario, the will of the people still goes to Hillary.
She is ahead in pledged delegates by a wide margin. Even if the SD's were allocated by win, she'd still be ahead by that same wide margin. The SD's have never flipped a nomination against the people. Doing so wouldn't be very democratic.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #64)
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:55 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
73. The will of the machines could pick Trump.
Response to 13Dogs (Reply #57)
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:49 PM
CentralMass (14,777 posts)
76. She has about 93% of the super d's who have comiitrd and Bernie has about 7% of them
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:09 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
2. There's no evidence of the efficacy of hypnosis even on fully willing subjects
There's no big mystery to Trump's success. He's just a more accomplished demagogue than his contemporaries. Feeding public bigotries has been practiced for thousands of years with varying rates of success.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #2)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:23 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
4. Hypnosis works and demagoguery depends on it.
Major keys for hypnosis to work ironically are both relaxation and strong emotion.
Relaxation allows information to reach the subconscious and strong emotion combined with repetition is what cements the memory or message. All hypnosis is actually self-hypnosis, even if you were hypnotized by a guiding hypnotist, you can't truly be hypnotized if you don't want to be. Mediation and/or prayer works under these same principles. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #4)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:13 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
39. Demagoguery depends on emotion, not voodoo
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #4)
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:20 PM
Jesus Malverde (10,274 posts)
74. Hypnosis is what Adams brought up as his own qualification.
Branding and persuasion is what they said trump is expert at. This is more a view on his ability to brand people and things. Low Energy might be mentioned in jebs obituary years from now.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #2)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:40 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (45,575 posts)
7. Trump is not using hypnosis. He's using hypnotic techniques. Both work but big difference.
Mountains of evidence hypnosis works. No evidence it works as "hypnosis" from things like political rallies.
But hypnotic techniques sure do work. For example, watch an Adolf Hitler speech. |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #7)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:06 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
13. "hypnotic techniques" require relaxation as a precursor
...which is definitely not what Trump is doing, even if such a thing were possible with mass audiences. Adolf Hitler was also a successful demagogue, and also most certainly did not employ "hypnotic techniques".
There is no secret voodoo to hypnosis. It simply combines relaxation techniques with cognitive behavioral therapy. |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #13)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:15 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
15. Yes he did.
German Nazi Party member Joseph Goebbels became Adolf Hitler's propaganda minister in 1933, which gave him power over all German radio, press, cinema, and theater. In 1925 Goebbels met the party leader Adolf Hitler. In 1926 he was made Gauleiter, or party leader, for the region of Berlin, and in 1927 he founded and became editor of the official National Socialist periodical Der Angriff (The Attack). He was elected to the Reichstag, the German parliament, in 1928. By exploiting mob emotions and by employing all modern methods of propaganda Goebbels helped Hitler into power. His work as a propagandist materially aided Hitler's rise to power in 1933. When Hitler seized power in 1933, Goebbels was appointed Reichsminister for propaganda and national enlightenment. From then until his death, Goebbels used all media of education and communications to further Nazi propagandistic aims, instilling in the Germans the concept of their leader as a veritable god and of their destiny as the rulers of the world. In 1938 he became a member of the Hitler cabinet council. Late in World War II, in 1944, Hitler placed him in charge of total mobilization. As Reichsminister for Propaganda and National Enlightenment, Goebbels was given complete control over radio, press, cinema, and theater; later he also regimented all German culture. Goebbels placed his undeniable intelligence and his brilliant insight into mass psychology entirely at the service of his party. His most virulent propaganda was against the Jews. As a hypnotic orator he was second only to Hitler, and in his staging of mass meetings and parades he was unsurpassed. Utterly cynical, he seems to have believed only in the self-justification of power. He remained loyal to Hitler until the end. On May 1, 1945, as Soviet troops were storming Berlin, Goebbels committed suicide. Listed below are the principles purported to summarize what made Goebbels tick or fail to tick. They may be thought of as his intellectual legacy. Whether the legacy has been reliably deduced is a methodological question. Whether it is valid is a psychological matter. Whether or when parts of it should be utilized in a democratic society are profound and disturbing problems of a political and ethical nature. (snip) http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html As for Trump the corporate media conglomerates have kept his name/face front and center 24/7 since the day he announced and viewing television puts one in a mild hypnotic state. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #15)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:23 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
20. Well you've certainly provided incontrovertible proof there
![]() |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #20)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:35 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
24. They controlled all aspects of Germany's mass media
and our corporate media conglomerate have saturated coverage of Trump whether he had anything worthy to say or not, of this there is no dispute.
Television May Be Doing Your Thinking (NewsTarget) The world's biggest leisure activity is watching television. Not walking or reading, not playing games with our children, not engaging with others in outdoor activities. Most of us like to think that television has absolutely no effect on how we think or what we do. We believe that it is a way to relax. Many of us may be surprised to know that television is a controlling medium, relaxing us enough to switch off our analytical brain (the left side of the brain) so that we uncritically, or unlogically, process the information beaming from the television. This means we are less able to make decisions or judgments about what we hear on television. Our brains undergo a similar process under hypnosis. The similarity between hypnosis and the effects of watching television is unveiled in Dr Aric Sigman's book called Remotely Controlled. Sigman describes hypnosis as "an altered state of consciousness"; a form of sleepwalking where our mind is influenced by another (the hypnotist or practitioner). Under hypnosis we become more open to the suggestions of the practitioner and this happens as we are asked to refrain from being critical and relaxed. As we do this, the frontal lobe in our brain alters becoming less connected with the brain so that we switch off. Hypnosis effectively causes a change in the brain so that we use the right side of our brain. What we switch off is the left side used for critical thinking. While hypnosis may be considered an extreme or unusual solution to certain conditions, it only takes 30 seconds for us to be in a similar state when we switch on the television. Such were the findings from Professor Herbert Krugman in a study conducted in 1971. His conclusion was that we do not think about the information transmitted via television. In other words the way television communicates is a form of brainwashing. (snip) The frontal lobe also alters in the brain when watching television. The frontal lobe is an important part of the brain as it is a management type system ensuring that our self-control, moral judgment and attention is planned, organised and sequenced. The concern is that the frontal lobe may be damaged by watching television and this may happen in childhood because the frontal lobe is in a continual stage of development until around 20 years of age. When children watch television, the frontal lobe is not doing anything with the result that over a period of time this part of the brain doesn't develop which can then stunt development. A study in The World Federation of Neurology outlined concerns about the impact of visual electronic media (including television) on children because of stunted frontal lobe development which also impacts on their ability to control antisocial behaviour. Playing and interacting with others is recommended to encourage the fibres in the frontal lobe to develop and thicken and to make stronger connections to neurons. It is not the information itself that causes the problem, but rather the medium. Somehow we are electrically wired to the television enabling information to be absorbed – any information. The medium induces within us a passive state for communication. If we are unconsciously absorbing information, then what is this information doing to the way we think and act? Of course, the medium is a perfect match for advertisers. http://www.naturalnews.com/024530.html You don't honestly believe that corporations have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on television advertising since the advent of T.V. in the 50's for no reason do you? ![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #24)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:43 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
28. Well that certainly clinches it. Who can argue with NaturalNews?
They even say "The world's top news source on natural health"
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #28)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:55 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
33. Here you go, if you want scholarly articles, have at it.
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #33)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:11 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
36. That also works with lots of other things
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #13)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:37 PM
TryLogic (1,686 posts)
25. Don't over emphasize "hypnotic". Trump is using clever and effective persuasive techniques to attack
and manipulate. Note that there are many Trump supporters who just want him regardless of any kind of factual considerations or even common sense. They certainly act hypnotized.
|
Response to TryLogic (Reply #25)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:49 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
31. As I said, he's simply a demagogue. No voodoo is involved.
Simply legitimizing and feeding peoples' prejudices, hate, fear, and other emotions is all that's required to throw reason right out the window. It absolutely appeals to those who are easily manipulated and has been a valuable tool of the right wing since recorded history and undoubtedly well before.
|
Response to TryLogic (Reply #25)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:53 PM
ToxMarz (2,083 posts)
32. He is appealing to the 'conservatives' fear, anger, bigotry and loss of control
That doesn't require hypnotism, they already possess the foundation of his appeal
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #13)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:13 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (45,575 posts)
38. Relaxation of the mental muscles, not the body.
Yes, he amps up people.
Hair and Herr do not and did not lull people to sleep or to passivity, but into an active trance-like state. It's got nothing to do with the "voodoo" straw man argument. More like sufi trance states and EDM dance trance-like states and chanting trance states. In the trance-like state he increases their tendency to suspend critical thinking. He reinforces their belief system rooted in "there's one big problem" ("Mexicans" or "Muslims" -- related in their minds). Hence many or most of them say if he "builds the wall" they'll forgive everything else he might do against them (his followers -- and we know he renege on almost all his promises given half a chance). Here's the dirty dozen RWA follower credos. Guess which ones he reinforces: * Authoritarian submission * Fear * Self-righteousness * Hostility * Lack of critical thinking * "Our biggest problem" thinking * Compartmentalized thinking * Double standards * Feeling empowered in groups * Dogmatism * Ethnocentrism * Prejudice |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #38)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:19 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
41. Active and trance are contradictory
There is no such thing as an "active trance-like state".
There is no voodoo involved with feeding negative base emotions. These people aren't in any sort of a "trance". They are simply hearing what they want to hear. Trump isn't the problem. He's a symptom of the problem. |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #41)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:22 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (45,575 posts)
44. Nope. He does entrance them, plants nicknames & reinforces their lack of critical thinking
Trump is a huge problem and a symptom of an even huger problem.
|
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #44)
Bernardo de La Paz This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #41)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:23 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (45,575 posts)
46. Do some research before you dismiss the idea of active trance-like states. . . nt
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #2)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:15 PM
valerief (53,235 posts)
40. People can be convinced to pray, die for the 1%, and smoke cigarettes. People
can be convinced of anything.
|
Response to valerief (Reply #40)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:21 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
43. Sure, voodoo is another method of achieving those ends
That doesn't mean voodoo has efficacy.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #43)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:49 PM
basselope (2,565 posts)
50. Depends how you define efficacy
If you take the literal definition
"the ability to produce a desired or intended result." Voodoo can be and HAS been quite effective. Confirmation bias plays a strong role in all of this and Trump is using it to his advantage very well. Hillary can't beat him in a debate, because his position is basically "Trust me, I'll do what needs to be done and it will be the right choice at the time, while I built a multi-billion empire, you have left a string of disasters in your wake." Worse, he can show Clinton to be just another corrupt politician, because he is someone who paid her off. He has the receipts. The confirmation bias is very strong here. |
Response to basselope (Reply #50)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:36 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
58. Efficacy =/ effective
That's kind of my whole point.
Just because something is effective in achieving a desired outcome doesn't mean it has the ability to produce the desired outcomes. So while all sorts of placebos are effective, that doesn't mean they have efficacy. |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #58)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:51 PM
basselope (2,565 posts)
59. You are misusing the term.
Placebos are considered to have STRONG efficacy.
http://www.livescience.com/42430-placebo-effect-half-of-drug-efficacy.html |
Response to basselope (Reply #59)
Sat May 28, 2016, 05:22 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
63. You are completely misunderstanding the term
Placebo's often have efficacy over doing nothing at all. Whether or not a drug or treatment is considered efficacious is the response compared to that of the placebo.
The Active drug group (A): who receive the active test drug.
The Placebo drug group (P): who receive a placebo drug that simulates the active drug. The Natural history group (NH): who receive no treatment of any kind (and whose condition, therefore, is allowed to run its natural course). The outcomes within each group are observed, and compared with each other, allowing us to measure: The efficacy of the active drug's treatment: the difference between A and NH (i.e., A-NH). The efficacy of the active drug's active ingredient: the difference between A and P (i.e., A-P). The magnitude of the placebo response: the difference between P and NH (i.e., P-NH). It is a matter of interpretation whether the value of P-NH indicates the efficacy of the entire treatment process or the magnitude of the "placebo response". The results of these comparisons then determine whether or not a particular drug is considered efficacious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo-controlled_study |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #43)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:09 PM
valerief (53,235 posts)
53. Uh, people pray, die for the 1%, and smoke cigarettes. I'd say brainwashing is very effective. nt
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #2)
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:52 PM
bjobotts (9,141 posts)
69. This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.Trump is just a bafoon stirring up hate.
We do not say "Oh Something must be wrong with Hillary" because Trump says 'crooked' Hillary. Guy's an idiot. Look at all the anti-Trump protesters. People are not conned by Trump they are insulted and embarrassed by him. Trump will not win in a landslide and is not some hypnotic speaker. He is a bully with enough security to talk over people, have people removed from his presence. and have a profiteering media kow-tow to his every word. This buffoon is offensive to the max blundering through life. Surviving because he was born into money. This "expert" has got his head up his ass to make such ridiculous claims. Trump's supporters have been grown by the socipathic republican tea party but they are a small part of America who could be persuaded by a chimp. Next he'll make the same claims about Palin and Louie Gohmert or Romney who were all just as repulsive. Sorry but Trump tv just don't fly around here.
|
Response to bjobotts (Reply #69)
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:17 PM
Major Nikon (36,334 posts)
70. You can't make shit up this funny
Adams' idea is Trump isn't the absolute moron that he appears and is instead a "master wizard" who "engineers" "linguistic kill shots" which obliterate his political opponents with "hypnotic techniques".
![]() So what did he "engineer" to take down HRC? "Major security risk" Brilliant! ![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:22 PM
ancianita (31,924 posts)
3. Adams says Trump's use of "coded" language hypnotically validates their need for "good old days"
privilege and dominance again.
The "good old days" were the days of common, everyday, institutionally validated violence against women, "homos" or any minorities. For centuries that everyday violence didn't even have a name or description. For more than half the population, that life was the everyday normal for an America that projected itself as "great." Dictators weave that collective dream while "branding" the opposition, for example, "corrupt Hillary," "crazy Bernie" and "losers" as the cornerstone of those old days. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jim__ (13,763 posts)
5. Adams forecast a landslide win for Trump in the Iowa caucus.
Oh well.
|
Response to Jim__ (Reply #5)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:35 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
6. Adams doesn't support Trump but he predicted that Trump will win the Presidency because of his
mastery of hypnotic speech.
This was from last last October. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #6)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:17 PM
ancianita (31,924 posts)
17. Way cool. Thanks for this video. Hillary campaign speech writers should see this.
Response to ancianita (Reply #17)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:20 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
19. Bernie and Hillary should be aware, whichever one becomes the nominee.
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:44 PM
PSPS (12,967 posts)
8. LOL. Yes, that's right. Trump is a master "hypnotist" casting his spell upon us!!11!1!
I hope you realize that "hypnosis" can't be distinguished from placebo. It's nothing but a carnival show. As soon as this guy Adams describes himself seriously as a "trained hypnotist," you can summarily dismiss anything else he has to say.
On the other hand, what he says here has nothing to do with "hypnosis" but, rather, Trump's flippant use of adjectives and catch phrases. That's nothing special in itself. And, if anything, it will be his undoing and not cause the fruition of this crazy guy's "prediction" that Trump is going to win the general election. |
Response to PSPS (Reply #8)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:03 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
11. There are differences between hypnosis and placebos but placebos have power over the mind as well,
which in turn can affect the body.
(snip) Brain and body[edit] For more details on this topic, see neural top down control of physiology. The brain has control over the body processes affected by placebos. In conditioning, a neutral stimulus saccharin is paired in a drink with an agent that produces an unconditioned response. For example, that agent might be cyclophosphamide, which causes immunosuppression. After learning this pairing, the taste of saccharin by itself is able to cause immunosuppression, as a new conditioned response via neural top-down control.[70] Such conditioning has been found to affect a diverse variety of not just basic physiological processes in the immune system but ones such as serum iron levels, oxidative DNA damage levels, and insulin secretion. Recent reviews have argued that the placebo effect is due to top-down control by the brain for immunity[71] and pain.[72] Pacheco-López and colleagues have raised the possibility of "neocortical-sympathetic-immune axis providing neuroanatomical substrates that might explain the link between placebo/conditioned and placebo/expectation responses."[71]:441 A recent fMRI study has shown that a placebo can reduce pain-related neural activity in the spinal cord, indicating that placebo effects can extend beyond the brain.[73] Dopaminergic pathways have been implicated in the placebo response in pain and depression.[74] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo |
Response to PSPS (Reply #8)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:20 PM
ancianita (31,924 posts)
18. Key words stay in the collective hive mind. Not hypnotism, but pretty close!
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:50 PM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
9. ... but ... but ... They say BERNIE does it, too !!
same speech over and over but ... but ...
|
Response to Hiraeth (Reply #9)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:06 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
12. Bernie doesn't repeat the same exact phrase multiple times in the same speech. Furthermore
Last edited Sat May 28, 2016, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1) there is nothing vague about Bernie's proposals, wherein Trump just allows his audience to fill in the gaps with their own aspirations.
|
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #12)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:10 PM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
14. but, THEY say it. It must be true, Uncle Joe.
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:54 PM
Soxfan58 (3,436 posts)
10. That segment scared the shit out of me.
I think it was Mahers way to get people to not blow off this election. And it worked.
|
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:16 PM
d_legendary1 (2,586 posts)
16. Also Trump is very charismatic
which is something that Hillary lacks. Its one of the reasons why the Smirking Chimp kept the election close in 2000. Trump is going to re-energize the Republican base with his style of bigotry and hate. He makes for a dangerous candidate and one who can win the Presidency on technique alone.
|
Response to d_legendary1 (Reply #16)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:19 PM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
55. He's not charismatic to everyone
He turns my stomach. I can't even watch him for a couple of minutes.
![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:30 PM
Perseus (4,341 posts)
22. Stop believing all this trash
Stupidity can only hypnotize the stupid, and those are the people who are getting hypnotized. Unfortunately, the American voters have proven time and time again to be extremely stupid.
Elections in the USA are treated like a sports contest where some people wear one team's shirt and the other group the other team's shirt..."The Republican Base" and the "Democratic Base" is just a group of fanatics who can't think for themselves and will vote for anyone who claims the nomination in their particular party. An example, the USA has a chance to vote for real change, this is a man who has a proven record, who has supported minorities all his political career, who understands that the USA IS NOT the greatest country in the history of the World and needs a lot of fixing, starting with its citizens whose majority embraces ignorance and bad manners, a man who understands the rights of its citizens and what government is supposed to do for them, and yet, they want to vote for the two people who will not deliver any of what is rightful theirs. The fantasy that the government is not supposed to give its people education, health care, and other social programs, and to accept that proves high levels of ignorance. Don't people realize they pay for all this with taxes? Sanders should be a no brainer choice for USA citizens, but no...they will make the wrong decisions once again because the "team" must win, who cares about the consequences. I don't dislike HRC, but she has a lot of baggage and she will no change anything because she does not believe in changing anything, she likes the status quo, she has lived all her life under that paradigm, and whether she wins or not, things will go as usual with the bickering in congress and the senate, people will continue to vote for bad people like the one in Flint, Kansas, etc. and God forbid, Trump. Anyway, stop believing that Trump has a "hypnotic power", he does not, the USA citizens were hypnotized long ago by TV, Monday Football, McDonald's, etc. |
Response to Perseus (Reply #22)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:49 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
30. I totally agree with your post regarding the need to elect Bernie but ignoring or downplaying
Trump's persuasive strengths does Bernie no service.
Sun Tzu “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War From day one I have stated that our corporate media conglomerates have enabled Trump with saturation coverage regardless of what he said, but Trump also knows how to use them. Trump is a demagogue and he does use hypnotic language. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #30)
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:02 AM
Perseus (4,341 posts)
71. I am not suggesting for Bernie to ignore Trump
Not at all, but this sudden panic that I see on this post and others regarding Trump's "magical hypnotic powers of perception" that seems to have rattled so many people should be dismissed. The empty minded people will like what Trump says, but I don't see that many empty minded people in DU, so stop the panic, people will see what he really is, and Bernie, or HRC for that matter, will be ready for him when the time comes. In the mean time, all we can do is try to open people's eyes.
Yes, know thy enemy, could not agree with you more. |
Response to Perseus (Reply #71)
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:17 AM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
72. I don't view hypnotic speech or hypnosis as magic, just an acquired skill.
Many of the same techniques are used in sales and marketing.
I didn't post the OP so much for D.U. but for the broader Internet and beyond community's awareness via the ripple effect. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:34 PM
Cryptoad (8,254 posts)
23. Too Bad Bern Lost to Hillary, heh?
Bern 's up n smoke
|
Response to Cryptoad (Reply #23)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:37 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
26. 1. The Democratic Primaries aren't over despite your fervent wishes to the contrary.
2. This OP is about Trump, regardless of which candidate opposes him.
|
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #26)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:42 PM
Cryptoad (8,254 posts)
27. Primaries not over, but Bern has lost,,,,,
OP abt Trump ,, my comment abt all the GOP style attacks on the presumptive Democratic Nominee by people wandering around lost!
|
Response to Cryptoad (Reply #23)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:58 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
60. Hillary should drop out.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #60)
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:08 PM
Cryptoad (8,254 posts)
67. Abt 17 million Democratic voters say,,,,,,,Nah!
Response to underpants (Reply #29)
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:57 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
34. That video is most apropos, Trump is a chicken.
![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:06 PM
Laughing Mirror (4,185 posts)
35. It's bad hypnosis
There is good hypnosis, which helps people in innumerable ways, and bad hypnosis, which helps only Trump.
He gets them in the trance, all the critical faculties off, and speaks directly to that persuasive part of the brain, the "subconscious" hypnotists call it, to seed in his "suggestions." Hypnotists say the subconscious has the mind of a 9-year old, so Trump uses a child's language to speak to that part of the subconscious that is most suggestive. He uses nasty labels on his opponents to get his audience to feel disgust. He reframes everything he says to please whoever he is talking to. And when people ask for clarification, he reframes again, and people get drawn in because he knows exactly how to go for the subconscious. He uses lots of hypnotic, persuasion techniques. He does have a certain mastery over them, no doubt. |
Response to Laughing Mirror (Reply #35)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:11 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
37. The subconscious is like the auto-pilot on an airplane, you can program it with instructions
but it literally doesn't care if it takes you to the airport or into the side of a mountain.
It's the conscious mind that make value or moral judgments. ![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #37)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:20 PM
Laughing Mirror (4,185 posts)
42. It can also make you habitually smoke or eat poorly, for example
Because you have taught it to do things that way, your conscious mind telling you it's a pleasure you want to partake in. The first role of the subconscious is to protect you, but it also wants to make you happy.
|
Response to Laughing Mirror (Reply #42)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:37 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
48. I had a friend,
she was having a panic attack, couldn't drive and stopped at a convenience store, called an ambulance to take her to the hospital.
When I got to the hospital the nurses took her to a waiting room for the doctor to check her out. She was claustrophobic and felt the walls were closing in on her, she kept leaving the waiting room to walk just outside the hospital doors, the nurse came out and was getting frustrated and told her to go back in. I was in the waiting room with her but she was exceptionally nervous so I told her to lay on her back, close her eyes, take deep breaths, visualize walking on the beach, feeling the white sand between her toes, seeing the blue green ocean, hearing the seagulls flying overhead. I kept this up for about ten minutes, she became much more relaxed and that's what we were doing when the doctor finally got there. I had learned these mediation techniques in the early 80s when I used them on myself with the aid of some cassettes that I purchased and they definitely worked on me. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #48)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:24 PM
Laughing Mirror (4,185 posts)
56. It's wonderful to know those techniques to help people in distress
Hats off to you for helping her out that time. Once I got her into a relaxed state with the guided breathing and the relaxation suggestions, I would offer her, as a special treat, a post-hypnotic suggestion as an anchor that would trigger her back to that much more relaxed state on the beach (or wherever she is most relaxed and safe) every time she feels another panic attack coming on.
And we can completely remove that claustrophobia too. We can take her back to when she first felt it and change the experience in her memory, and for her subconscious, so that she will never experience walls closing in on her again. In fact it might make her laugh that she had ever suffered from claustrophobia to begin with. The mind is a powerful thing. Once people know that, they are willing to let you show them how. |
Response to Laughing Mirror (Reply #56)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:58 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
61. That's a good idea, Laughing Mirror.
I will present that suggestion to her.
Peace to you. ![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:34 PM
Octafish (55,745 posts)
47. LSD and suggestion help, per Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, MD, CIA.
If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands.
![]() In the photo above, Richard Helms and Richard Nixon go over "The Bay of Pigs Thing" and other secret affairs. Mr. Helms personally attended to the destruction of the most sensitive MK/ULTRA files, rather than turn "the Family Jewels" over to the Pike and Church committees in Congress. MK-ULTRA: The CIA and Mind Control
The People's History Wednesday, March 12, 2014 “In the 1950's and early 1960's, the agency gave mind-altering drugs to hundreds of unsuspecting Americans in an effort to explore the possibilities of controlling human consciousness. Many of the human guinea pigs were mental patients, prisoners, drug addicts and prostitutes -- ''people who could not fight back,'' as one agency officer put it. In one case, a mental patient in Kentucky was dosed with LSD continuously for 174 days.” - New York Times1 MK-ULTRA is the codename given to a CIA research operation into biological behavioral engineering, also known as mind control. Many people are familiar with the operation but incorrectly assume that it was limited to LSD research. While there were plenty of resources devoted to LSD research, it was only one area of a vast field of mind control operations. MK-ULTRA researcher Ike Feldman said himself that: “The LSD... that was just the tip of the iceberg... Espionage. Assassinations. Dirty tricks. Drug experiments. Sexual encounters and the study of prostitutes for clandestine use. That is what I was doing when I worked for George White and the CIA.”2 MK-ULTRA had several precursors. There was Project Chatter in 1947, which tested drugs such as the infamous Scopalmine during interrogations.3 There was Project Bluebird in 1949, which began studies into hypnosis.4 The document describing the initiation of Project Bluebird outlines these special problems, among many others, that they were hoping to address: * Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an hypnotic condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit? Project Artichoke began in 1951, with a scope of ... “Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?”6 All of the above projects were shuttled into MK-ULTRA in 1953, under the Technical Services Division, combining over 150 sub-projects7, undertaken at over 80 institutions8 such as universities, hospitals, prisons and pharmaceutical companies. Many of the projects were covertly ran through front organizations without the knowledge of the institution that hosted them. CONTINUED... http://www.thepeopleshistory.net/2014/03/mk-ultra_12.html What was Raymond doing with his hands? How did the old ladies turn into Chinese Generals? |
Response to Octafish (Reply #47)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:45 PM
Uncle Joe (55,603 posts)
49. Fascinating read.
Thanks for the addition, Octafish.
![]() |
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #49)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:51 PM
Octafish (55,745 posts)
51. You are most welcome, Uncle Joe! Thank you for an outstanding OP and thread!
That Korporal Konica fellow sure shows up whenever a giant chicken toe at the Pentagon gets stepped on, right as rain.
We've seen a lot of the type over the last 15 years on DU, one of the few places left IN THE WORLD where people can discuss Democracy and be heard AROUND THE WORLD. |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:09 PM
RKP5637 (65,652 posts)
54. Exactly, he knows what he's doing, if not hypnotic, but by repetition of
short key word targeting slogans over and over again, basically an advertising technique. Kind of psychops stuff.
|
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 04:10 PM
Lodestar (2,388 posts)
62. Hypnotic perhaps if you're receptive. More like finger nails on a chalkboard to me. n/t
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 05:32 PM
jimmyzvoice (159 posts)
65. “Dangerous Donald” should be our nickname for Donald Trump.
During the Republican debates, some of Trump’s opponents used his kind of insults to fight against him, but they all failed.
But this nickname stuff, described by Scott Adams, might just be what we need to use against Trump. How can we get everyone to call him “Dangerous Donald”? Imagine an ad in which we are given quotes that illustrate how dangerous Donald Trump is for our country and the world. After each quote is repeated, “That’s why we call him Dangerous Donald”. At the end of a series of four or five quotes simply state, “Donald Trump is dangerous for our country and the world. He must not be allowed to become President of the United States”. Wouldn’t it be great if every time Donald Trump says something out of line we could get everyone to think, “Dangerous Donald”? |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:54 PM
Bigredhunk (1,296 posts)
66. IDK About Hypnosis
Repugs have always done this. They have a few phrases/names they repeat ad nauseam. Their base laps it up, repeating and repeating.
Sore Loserman Flip-Flopper Drill Baby Drill USA! USA! USA! It works much better on their side b/c they're more like sheep, they're simple. Our people aren't as zombie-like. We think for ourselves more, and we don't get down in the mud b/c we're kinder...we don't like the ugly (same reason hate radio/tv doesn't work from the left, IMO). Sometimes I'm jealous at how well it works on their side. More often I'm disgusted at how moronic they are, and am glad that we're above that. Point is, I don't think it's anything new. They always do the nicknames, repeating simple phrases, etc... |
Response to Bigredhunk (Reply #66)
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:41 PM
dembotoz (16,038 posts)
68. they really are so much better at this than we are
sometimes is like a war between the klingons and vulcan......
we have the facts and logic and they have the emotion and passion. if passion drives the turnout as i feel it does....we are in trouble |
Response to Uncle Joe (Original post)
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jesus Malverde (10,274 posts)