Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Clooney: Completely Agree With Protesters $353K Price Tag For My Clinton Fundraiser “Obscene” (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 OP
George Clooney hosts a 15 million dollar fund raising ad for Bernie Sanders...nt Kalidurga Apr 2016 #1
Love him most of the time but he's trying to have it both ways. If he thinks that, a good roguevalley Apr 2016 #46
Mr Clooney - Why Then - Are You Supporting - The Future War Hawk In Chief cantbeserious Apr 2016 #2
Maybe he is worried about making Hillary's naughty list... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #3
Why Would Someone As Intelligent As Clooney Fall For That Type Of Manipulation cantbeserious Apr 2016 #5
Narcissism? Helen Borg Apr 2016 #24
Reality. Which I hope will change. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #31
Maybe his wife is friends with Huma? I don't know. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #6
I so love you cantbeserious ybbor Apr 2016 #41
Okay George, you ARE back to being hottest man in Hollywood. 👍 lostnfound Apr 2016 #4
also confirms there is weak grassroots support for Hillary tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #7
Clinton has half of the individual contributions that Sanders has CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #28
I'm trying to figure out why because their campaign exhaustedly keep saying they have more votes tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #32
I find this curious as well CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #37
Most "votes" ignore all the caucus states they don't "Vote" they caucus See how the smear is spread Vincardog Apr 2016 #44
No, I think Hillary has twice the amount of money Baobab Apr 2016 #40
I just changed my post CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #42
If you include superpac she has more money... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #43
Don't clap too hard. I think this is just a way to get you to watch. He will probably say bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #8
I bet you are right, there had to be the word "but" coming next except it was cut off. Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #11
Oh, exactly. He deeply regrets what he has to do... dchill Apr 2016 #12
Most hated? murielm99 Apr 2016 #17
Votes = wrong metric. As you know. dchill Apr 2016 #19
She has the most pledged delegates murielm99 Apr 2016 #20
Jesus God. The false claim is that she is ahead... dchill Apr 2016 #21
Goodbye. murielm99 Apr 2016 #22
I know you are but what am I? dchill Apr 2016 #23
Don't you understand what this person is saying? CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #39
Sanders is even less competitive than he appears: murielm99 Apr 2016 #48
Good post. Spot on ... 100% KPN Apr 2016 #35
I'm going to place my bet on naivety Scootaloo Apr 2016 #51
Uh, George..... Then why did you do it? SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #9
Redeem yourself George and publically endorse Bernie Duckfan Apr 2016 #10
Emotional blackmail is fun shenmue Apr 2016 #13
I'm glad that you're having fun when emotionally blackmailing someone. BeanMusical Apr 2016 #16
I'm laughing as I type CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #29
You're very welcome. BeanMusical Apr 2016 #45
Good grief. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #27
He can't be a traitor to his class. zeemike Apr 2016 #15
He did expose Hillary for who she is Geronimoe Apr 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author BeanMusical Apr 2016 #18
It's ridiculous that we should have this kind of money in politics . . . Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #25
Whoa. In spite of the event, he's on the Clinton's €©£¥ list now! nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #26
Just a thought, but maybe CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #30
No doubt. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #33
Oops, dupe. Stupid computer. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #34
That sounds about right. bjo59 Apr 2016 #36
Yup. KPN Apr 2016 #38
I understand already... Mr_Jefferson_24 Apr 2016 #50
Yeah, yeah, yeah.... ReRe Apr 2016 #47
So he admits to being part of something ridiculous and obscene. progressoid Apr 2016 #49

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
46. Love him most of the time but he's trying to have it both ways. If he thinks that, a good
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:02 AM
Apr 2016

man would have said no.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
3. Maybe he is worried about making Hillary's naughty list...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:06 PM
Apr 2016

I heard she is really vindictive to people who cross her. McCaskill is still paying for backing Obama in 2008

lostnfound

(16,162 posts)
4. Okay George, you ARE back to being hottest man in Hollywood. 👍
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:08 PM
Apr 2016

Even if you're raising money for the wrong candidate in this primary, honesty is sooo sexy.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
7. also confirms there is weak grassroots support for Hillary
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:15 PM
Apr 2016

or she would not need to raise money from SuperPACS, fat cats, etc

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
28. Clinton has half of the individual contributions that Sanders has
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:13 AM
Apr 2016

so that is exactly right.

Sanders has twice as many individual contributions as Clinton.

She does not have the broad base of "We The People" funding her campaign, like Bernie does. So, she relies on the glitterati and the corporations.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
32. I'm trying to figure out why because their campaign exhaustedly keep saying they have more votes
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:21 AM
Apr 2016

are they votes from people who aren't motivated enough to care to send money?

I remember when she was running against Obama, she was close in votes too, but she was making loans out to her campaign while Barack was getting record revenues. It's like a 'put your money where your mouth is' disconnect.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
37. I find this curious as well
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:24 AM
Apr 2016

Maybe many of her supporters are voting for her based on name recognition/inevitability--and therefore there is a lack of enthusiasm?

I sometimes wonder exactly what is going on. She's got low rally attendance (and always has). She's got half of the campaign contributions as Bernie. The metric that she does have is votes--and I can't help but wonder if she's stealing away across America.

Something just doesn't feel right.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
42. I just changed my post
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:43 AM
Apr 2016

I think it was confusing.

Bernie has twice as many individual contributions as Hillary.

Hillary does have more money--but half as many individual contributions.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
43. If you include superpac she has more money...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:54 AM
Apr 2016

But candidate committee to candidate committee Sanders has outraised her finally since March.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
8. Don't clap too hard. I think this is just a way to get you to watch. He will probably say
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:18 PM
Apr 2016

something like BUT it takes lots of money to win and Hillary needs to win yada yada yada.

dchill

(38,436 posts)
12. Oh, exactly. He deeply regrets what he has to do...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:38 PM
Apr 2016

to get the most hated candidate ever into the White House. Again.

But he's going to do it, nevertheless.

murielm99

(30,715 posts)
17. Most hated?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:11 AM
Apr 2016

Yeah, sure. That's why she has 2.5 million more votes than St. Bernie. That's why she has all kinds of support from people who worked with her in Congress, and Sanders has almost none. Yeah, there is some real hate.

dchill

(38,436 posts)
19. Votes = wrong metric. As you know.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:19 AM
Apr 2016

The metric is pledged delegates. Caucus states rarely even announce popular vote totals. I state this for reference only, as I'm sure you know it. But false claims are the HRC way, as true claims have an anti-Hillary bias.

And yes, she is the most hated and reviled candidate the Democratic Party has ever fielded. DINJARIE.

murielm99

(30,715 posts)
20. She has the most pledged delegates
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:22 AM
Apr 2016

AND the most votes, as I am sure you know. False claims? Why are st. bernie's supporters so math challenged?

dchill

(38,436 posts)
21. Jesus God. The false claim is that she is ahead...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:28 AM
Apr 2016

by 2.5 million popular votes. That's not possibly true when many states did not even release popular vote totals. Apparently, even basic math skills are above your head. Insulting, eh?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
39. Don't you understand what this person is saying?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:29 AM
Apr 2016

Caucus results are not factored into the total number of votes, because the raw vote totals are not released in caucuses.

So, when you say that Hillary has xxx more votes than Bernie--several states are left out of that equation. States that have caucuses.

Bernie won most of those caucuses.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
51. I'm going to place my bet on naivety
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:24 AM
Apr 2016

Very possibly he thinks those big aggregate donations his event collected really are divvied up appropruiately between the campaign, state parties, and DNC. After all, that's the stated premise of aggregate donations.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
9. Uh, George..... Then why did you do it?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:19 PM
Apr 2016

Oh right. Clinton enemies list. Well, you're on it now anyway, I assume....

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
10. Redeem yourself George and publically endorse Bernie
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:37 PM
Apr 2016

Then campaign for him if you think $353,000 is a gross amount of money in politics

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
14. He did expose Hillary for who she is
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:46 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie advising the pope on moral economics, while Hillary is collecting more money from fat cats.

Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Original post)

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
25. It's ridiculous that we should have this kind of money in politics . . .
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:04 AM
Apr 2016

. . .But it is what it is and the way it is tells us that in order to compete we need to raise this ridiculous kind of money therefore and raise that money we shall because we have to.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
30. Just a thought, but maybe
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:18 AM
Apr 2016

Clooney is doing some damage control?

His name is attached to these two "obscene" fundraisers. Both events have received enormously bad publicity and they epitomize everything that is wrong with our corrupt-campaign finance system--and he's at the epicenter of all of this.

There were protests at both events.

Maybe he's worried that his brand is being damaged or diminished?

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
47. Yeah, yeah, yeah....
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:52 AM
Apr 2016

.... but look at the s-t-u-p-i-d look on Check Todd's face. I don't think he expected that answer out of George's mouth. Eat some doo-doo, Chuck!

progressoid

(49,943 posts)
49. So he admits to being part of something ridiculous and obscene.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

Was there a follow up question like, "then why are you doing it?"

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»George Clooney: Completel...