Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumThom Hartmann gets Trolled by Hillbots on Twitter!
Thom Hartmann shares his experience of being trolled for a Tweet he sent out regarding Hillary Clinton's surrogate ballots in Wyoming.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Response to thomhartmann (Original post)
Post removed
downeastdaniel
(497 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)Most of us have had horrible experiences. In my case longtime friends have turned into trolls and lobby slurs as often as they can.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)You got many, many responses from a lot of people.
I looked at your feed. You got a lot of responses from all over.
In fact I believe there were threads here at DU about your original tweet.
Why are you not making a fuss about that?
I'm sure the site appreciates all the new Hillary supporters you are bringing to them.
downeastdaniel
(497 posts)Know.
merrily
(45,251 posts)But, this story is obviously untrue. Only supporters of Sanders troll on the internet. I know that, because they all have to provide irrefutable proof of supporting Sanders before they use the internet.
stonecutter357
(12,682 posts)A tool for the Kremlin.
jalan48
(13,798 posts)FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)and I think even less of 1950s red baiting.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)You need to go after DU I guess:
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/12511696163
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)First time I saw that tweet.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)He presented a question and provided a link to another tweet. What was disgusting?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It was vailed but we knew what he meant.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Didn't he delete his tweet?
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I can tell you I feel people were very right to challenge him.
DURHAM D
(32,596 posts)he is mad because he got caught. He sounds like a Republican.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)The part where the woman called in to talk about it?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Hillary got when asked about her oily cash flows, or some other kinda mad?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)no wonder he is relegated to obscure media situations.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Why isn't Thom on one of those corporate-owned and censored networks???
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Hill people don't want to physically show up because they don't want to feel what it's like to be on the losing side, so they fill out a bullshit form. Congrats Willy, I guess.
Beaverhausen
(24,467 posts)...Having to work, etc.
There are many reasons voters are unable to physically show up at a caucus and not every state allows absentee caucus voting.
Why are you so anxious to disenfranchise some voters?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)reason to use it. That's Bill's wink wink bullshit.
Beaverhausen
(24,467 posts)That doesn't make sense.
RandySF
(57,659 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)mindless babble.
Makes me want vote for Hillary!
Not.
Response to Phlem (Reply #33)
Name removed Message auto-removed
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)from all the corrupt practices of HRC, sure have a critical eye for minor gaffes of anyone else, even someone who has reported for the left for years on this site against human rights abuses.
The difference is those who have lost the public trust are under scrutiny because of their untrustworthy record, and who are the ones with a questionable human rights practices.
Peace Thom all is well.