Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWhen Hitler's Anti-Semitism Was Called 'Political Cleverness'
Interesting piece
In 1922, after hearing from several, reliable, knowledgeable political sources the New York Times wrote, "Hitler's antisemitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded. He was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1631 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Hitler's Anti-Semitism Was Called 'Political Cleverness' (Original Post)
rpannier
Mar 2016
OP
Listen to politicians. If they ride into power on what they say they will mostly do what they say.
The Wielding Truth
Mar 2016
#1
It's amazing that the 1922 NYT piece so closely mirrors today's Trump media narrative.
Enthusiast
Mar 2016
#3
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)1. Listen to politicians. If they ride into power on what they say they will mostly do what they say.
Behind the Aegis
(53,951 posts)2. It still is.
It just isn't as blatant and much more difficult for people to even comprehend. Other forms of bigotry also get a similar treatment occasionally, but generally, most people are able to distinguish it and it boils down to "bigotry" or "I just don't care." What is happening with Trump and even Cruz, boils down to a bit of both, acknowledgement of bigotry, but mostly it is, "I don't care." which is the overriding sentiment.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)3. It's amazing that the 1922 NYT piece so closely mirrors today's Trump media narrative.
"He's just saying that, he really doesn't mean it."
We have to take all this shit very seriously.
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)4. Simple rule. Take a Politicians words very seriously; to the letter.
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)5. Hitler on a smaller scale; with Steaks and Champagne. This time is Mexicans and Muslims.
Who's next?