9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

Watch his other videos where he uses simple to understand experiments to explain why the official story cannot be truth. Its a series that is worth your time.

So these untrained pilots, or any pilot for that matter could ram a plane into the exact floors where the supposed demo charges were rigged. Or did they rig the whole building, something that takes days on actual demolitions, just on the off chance the planes missed. And if they rigged the building to explode why ram planes into them. They could have just blow. The building s up and framed some person or persons as the bombers and get the exact same rage.

FFS the amount of disbelief you need to suspend to believe this stuff is like a religion.

So what is it. The government is so incompetent that it can't do anything correct and is the cause of all our problems or some ultra effective skilled machine that is able to keep a conspiracy of a magnitude the size of a sun secret even though so many have investigated.

You are given a brain use it.

As a side note does DU tolerate this crap. The culture here sometimes baffles me.

How were those untrained amateur pilots flying for the first time on the jumbo jets able to perform such a maneuver that hit those 2 buildings? lets not even talk about the guy who hit the pentagon cos his performance was even more complex than hitting the twin towers. But this thread is focused on the molten steel debate not some conspiracy theory about what untrained amateur pilots are able to do, that's a discussion for another thread

It was OK to post the blacksmith's simplistic mocking of people who support further investigation of 911 on DU, so I hope the admins lets this stand.

...why not post it as a Reply to that video?

Sad to see such blunted vision as if only one answer is acceptable. A shame we see that kind of narrowed vision here at DU. It's almost like blind faith in a religion.

In the day of extensive government outsourcing of all kinds of specialized services why would you assume only an allegedly inadequate government agency could be the only possible source of such a plan or the only means for such a plan to be put in place?

With an administration at the time widely known for its willingness to hide all kinds of nefarious activities, and one with a history of direct relationships to the activist, regime-change side of the intelligence community, why would it NOT be reasonable to ask for better proofs and public inquiry?

And let us not forget that the same kind of malevolent fanaticism that defined the Cheney/Bush regime has held sway in the CIA since its inception. It was Allen Dulles' crew that floated the idea of killing thousands of innocent Americans, then blaming the attack on Castro so they could justify invading Cuba. Eisenhower shot down that scheme, but the point is, someone conceived the idea and was willing to put it into action.

Anyone who doesn't believe the authors and adherents of the Project for a New American Century would be willing to implement just such a murderous "False Flag" attack in order to further their diseased political agenda are living in a fantasy world.

Those at the top of the Conservative food chain are irredeemably evil psychopaths with not a molecule of conscience. How can anyone listen to Dick Cheney's venom for even a minute or two and not know that?

Oh, and Douglas Adams RULES!

Please repost in CS