Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 04:29 AM Aug 2014

TRAILER - War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State

WARNING: Trailer starts with IED explosion in context of whistleblower who exposed inferiority of Hummers vs MRAPs. Senator (now VP) Biden's role/responsiveness acknowledged.

http://www.waronwhistleblowers.com



TRAILER - War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State

Published on Jun 6, 2013


War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State highlights four cases where whistleblowers noticed government wrong-doing and took to the media to expose the fraud and abuse. It exposes the surprisingly worsening and threatening reality for whistleblowers and the press. The film includes interviews with whistleblowers Michael DeKort, Thomas Drake, Franz Gayl and Thomas Tamm and award-winning journalists like David Carr, Lucy Dalglish, Glenn Greenwald, Seymour Hersh, Michael Isikoff, Bill Keller, Eric Lipton, Jane Mayer, Dana Preist, Tom Vanden Brook and Sharon Weinberger.

With President Obama's commitment to transparency and the passage of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act, there was hope that whistleblowers would finally have more protection and encouragement to speak up. But times have never been worse for national security whistleblowers. New rights are all about employment and do nothing to protect against threats of prosecution and incarceration. In fact, the Obama administration has attacked more whistleblowers under the Espionage Act than all previous administrations combined. There are 56 federal laws about whistleblower job rights, but none about protection from imprisonment.

http://www.bravenewfilms.org/tags/war_on_whistleblowers

War on Whistleblowers

War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State highlights four cases where whistleblowers noticed government wrong-doing and took to the media to expose the fraud and abuse. It exposes the surprisingly worsening and threatening reality for whistleblowers and the press. The film includes interviews with whistleblowers Michael DeKort, Thomas Drake, Franz Gayl and Thomas Tamm and award-winning journalists like David Carr, Lucy Dalglish, Glenn Greenwald, Seymour Hersh, Michael Isikoff, Bill Keller, Eric Lipton, Jane Mayer, Dana Priest, Tom Vanden Brook and Sharon Weinberger.


MORE: http://www.waronwhistleblowers.com/bios
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TRAILER - War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State (Original Post) proverbialwisdom Aug 2014 OP
WaPo Editorial Board: The administration should not press reporter James Risen to reveal a source proverbialwisdom Aug 2014 #1
I saw it. It's *great*. Smarmie Doofus Aug 2014 #2
Same here. The trailer video should swap out the still photo, however, it's misleading. (nt) proverbialwisdom Aug 2014 #3

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
1. WaPo Editorial Board: The administration should not press reporter James Risen to reveal a source
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 04:49 AM
Aug 2014
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-administration-should-not-press-reporter-james-risen-to-reveal-a-source/2014/08/21/8dfeb868-28a3-11e4-8593-da634b334390_story.html

The Post's View
The administration should not press reporter James Risen to reveal a source


By Editorial Board August 21 at 8:07 PM

LAST WEEK President Obama offered some lofty words about journalism and democracy. Commenting on the unrest in Ferguson, Mo., he declared, “Here, in the United States of America, police should not be bullying or arresting journalists who are just trying to do their jobs and report to the American people on what they see on the ground.”

Mr. Obama has consistently proclaimed his belief in press freedom and its importance in our democracy. But his record undermines his words. The administration has conducted the most far-reaching campaign against leaks in recent memory, with more prosecutions than all previous administrations combined. Perhaps Mr. Obama doesn’t see any conflict here, but we do.

Democracy rests on a delicate balance between secrecy and the public’s need to know about government actions. We’ve long argued that some things must be kept secret, especially in national security, and there are laws and rules for that. But we also believe that, at times, the only way important information reaches the American people is through leaks, and journalists should not be punished for reporting them.

It is well documented that the U.S. government has been excessive in classifying information. No one in Washington is ever prosecuted for needlessly stamping “secret” on a memo or report.

This brings us to the case of James Risen, the New York Times reporter who has been the subject of a long effort by the Justice Department to compel him to testify about the identity of a confidential source used for a chapter in his 2006 book, “State of War.” Prosecutors want Mr. Risen’s testimony in their case against Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA official who is accused of leaking details of a failed operation against Iran’s nuclear program. Mr. Risen properly has refused to identify his source, at the risk of imprisonment. Such confidential sources are a pillar of how journalists obtain information. If Mr. Risen is forced to reveal the identity of a source, it will damage the ability of journalists to promise confidentiality to sources and to probe government behavior.

Mr. Risen’s court appeals have been exhausted. A number of journalists and news organizations, including The Post, have called on the administration to abandon the effort to force Mr. Risen to testify. In recent days, fresh petitions have been presented to the Justice Department, renewing calls to drop the Risen subpoena.

Last year, the Justice Department announced a review of its policies in using law enforcement tools such as subpoenas and court orders to obtain information from the news media. At the time, the department insisted that journalists would “not be subject to prosecution based solely on news gathering activities.” Or as Mr. Obama put it last year, “journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs.” Mr. Risen is at risk. Now is the time to turn these words into deeds.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»TRAILER - War on Whistleb...