Virginia Repubs move ahead with Mass Disenfranchisement - (by trickery) - American Prospect
http://prospect.org/article/virginia-republicans-move-forward-mass-disenfranchisement(emphasis my own)
This morning, I wrote on an emerging Republican planin swing states won by President Obamato rig presidential elections by awarding electoral votes to the winner of the most congressional districts. Because Democratic voters tend to cluster in highly-populated urban areas, and Republican voters tend to reside in more sparsely populated regions, this makes land the key variable in electionsto win the majority of a states electoral votes, your voters will have to occupy the most geographic space.
In addition to disenfranchising voters in dense areas, this would end the principle of one person, one vote. If Ohio operated under this scheme, for example, Obama would have received just 22 percent of the electoral votes, despite winning 52 percent of the popular vote in the state.
For this reason, I didnt expect Republicans to go forward with the planthe risk of blowback is just too high. My skepticism, however, was misplaced. In Virginia, a local news station reports that just this afternoon, a state Senate subcommittee recommended a bill to end Virginias winner-take-all system and apportion its 13 electoral votes by congressional district.
Unlike similar proposals in Pennsylvania and Michigan, this one wouldnt award the remaining electoral votes to the winner (Virginia has 11 districts). Rather, the winner of the most congressional districts would get the final two votes. If this were in effect last year, Obama would have gotten just 4 of the states votes, despite winning 51 percent of its voters.(more)
catbyte
(34,358 posts)if this succeeds.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)party people. Start talking to people about this to see what they think can be done. It might very well require large numbers of people showing up a state legislatures to have persuasive conversations with the anti-Democracy goons. I think if people want a democracy, they have come out and show they will not allow the sabotage and overthrow of our government.
Differences of opinion over policy is one thing but when an organized group sets out to disenfranchise large numbers of people and threaten our very system of Democratic government, it seems like action must be taken.
catbyte
(34,358 posts)massive protests. They couldn't care less. They despise democracy. We are living it in MI.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)catbyte
(34,358 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Courts have ruled against some of these practices in states like Texas.
Kablooie
(18,619 posts)why are the Republicans coming up with clever schemes that will eliminate Democrats from politics?