Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,042 posts)
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 08:51 PM Nov 2012

Naomi Klein: Super Storm Sandy—A People’s Shock?


from The Nation:


Super Storm Sandy—A People’s Shock?

Naomi Klein
November 5, 2012


[font size="1"]Rockaway resident Christine Walker walks along the beach under what is left of the boardwalk in the borough of Queens, New York, Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)[/font]


Less than three days after Sandy made landfall on the East Coast of the United States, Iain Murray of the Competitive Enterprise Institute blamed New Yorkers’ resistance to big-box stores for the misery they were about to endure. Writing on Forbes.com he explained that the city’s refusal to embrace Walmart will likely make the recovery much harder: “Mom-and-pop stores simply can’t do what big stores can in these circumstances,” he wrote.

And the preemptive scapegoating didn’t stop there. He also warned that if the pace of reconstruction turned out to be sluggish (as it so often is) then “pro-union rules such as the Davis-Bacon Act” would be to blame, a reference to the statute that requires workers on public-works projects to be paid not the minimum wage, but the prevailing wage in the region.

The same day, Frank Rapoport, a lawyer representing several billion-dollar construction and real estate contractors, jumped in to suggest that many of those public works projects shouldn’t be public at all. Instead, cash-strapped governments should turn to “public private partnerships,” known as “P3s.” That means roads, bridges and tunnels being rebuilt by private companies, which, for instance, could install tolls and keep the profits.

Up until now, the only thing stopping them has been the law—specifically the absence of laws in New York State and New Jersey that enable these sorts of deals. But Rapoport is convinced that the combination of broke governments and needy people will provide just the catalyst needed to break the deadlock. “There were some bridges that were washed out in New Jersey that need structural replacement, and it’s going to be very expensive,” he told The Nation. “And so the government may well not have the money to build it the right way. And that's when you turn to a P3.” ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thenation.com/article/171048/super-storm-sandy-peoples-shock



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Naomi Klein: Super Storm Sandy—A People’s Shock? (Original Post) marmar Nov 2012 OP
Fuck that shit, toll roads and minimum wages. NYC_SKP Nov 2012 #1
These people are disgusting. Chakab Nov 2012 #2
The sad part is that disasters can be used in a positive way. fasttense Nov 2012 #3
Post of the day! limpyhobbler Nov 2012 #4
I want to say UnF*ing believable, but ... adirondacker Nov 2012 #5
Such vultures. myrna minx Nov 2012 #6
 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
3. The sad part is that disasters can be used in a positive way.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:56 AM
Nov 2012

They can be a catalyst for preventing future disasters. They can be used to strengthen communities and governments. Instead of using them to steal from the poor and funnel more money to the filthy rich, they should be used to prevent future similar problems from ever occurring. You know, like actually doing something about global climate change.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Naomi Klein: Super Storm ...