Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sam1

(498 posts)
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 09:33 AM Oct 2012

The Government is different

Myth Drives the Budget Fuss
By Thornton “Tip” Parker

Nearly everyone believes that Uncle Sam is like a family that must get money before it can spend. But that is not true. A basic function of any sovereign government is to create and run the country’s money system. Unlike a family, the US government is sovereign. It creates money and can never run out. All the words about America’s financial limits mean nothing.

Years ago, our money was based on silver and gold. But that did become a limitation when economies around the world needed money to grow faster than metal was dug out of the ground. The US went off the gold standard in 1971, but we still act as if its limitations remain.

The economy is often shown as a circular flow of goods and services moving in one direction from producers to consumers, and money to pay for them flowing in the opposite direction. Like a juggling act, the flow keeps running until something interferes. Families that save interfere by removing some of the money. They also remove money when they buy more things from other countries than the US exports. The flow of goods and services slows down when money is removed unless some other party replaces it.

The sovereign federal government is the other party. It creates new dollars by spending more into the flow than it removes with taxes. The big bad deficits that haunt so many people are just new dollars that the government crates to replace dollars that savers and importers remove. Moreover, the federal debt that causes so much heartburn is just the sum of all new dollars created since the country began.

Truth in labeling would have deficits called something like “new dollars created” or “new savings” and the debt would become “total dollars created” or “total savings”. This is shown every week when savers bid to buy Treasury securities as safe places to put their dollars. The debt is not a liability that will burden future generations, it is an asset that present and future generations of savers will depend on.

The details of how the country’s money system works are complicated, but the basics are simple. Most of our money consists of bank deposits that are transferred electronically or by check. Behind most deposits are mortgages, credit card balances, and other types of loans. When things work well, banks create money as it is needed by lending to increase deposits and remove it when the loans are repaid. As the population grows, as people want to save, and as the country imports more than it exports, new money is needed to supplement the bank deposits. The government creates that new money by spending more than receives from taxes.

If you understand that paragraph, you’ve got it! You are way ahead of most Americans and nearly all our politicians.

The power of the money system is also easy to understand. Because the government creates money by spending more than it receives from taxes, it will always be able to pay its bills. Neither it nor any of its programs can ever be forced into bankruptcy. This means that there are no Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid crises. While there is widespread unemployment, there is no financial reason not to help those in need or spend to create jobs. It is negligent to put off upgrading school buildings, roads, bridges, power grids, and water and sewer systems until they fail. It is gross mismanagement to force state and local governments to fire thousands of public service employees that could be avoided with federal revenue sharing. And it is a basic social failure to not educate our young and prepare them for life without burdening them with education debts.

There are limits: if the government creates too much new money, it can lead to inflation. But inflation is not a problem now, when millions of people are out of work or not earning adequate incomes because too little money is in circulation. If our leaders understood how the system works, they would see how easy it would be to prevent serious inflation with taxes.

None of the arguments against actions to improve the situation today are valid if they are based on the myth that because the government is like a family it can’t afford to spend beyond its income. In reality, the government is just the opposite, or a mirror image of a family.

His email is [email protected]

This is a post that I found on the blog New Economic Perspectives.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Government is different (Original Post) Sam1 Oct 2012 OP
Bravo! OSPREYXIV Oct 2012 #1
It took me six months Lefty Thinker Oct 2012 #2
The problem with MMT is that it ignores the psychological side of things. Odin2005 Oct 2012 #3
I Know what you are saying. Sam1 Oct 2012 #4
That seems a little bit like arguing against the germ theory Lefty Thinker Oct 2012 #5
Pathogens exist outside of human social reality. Odin2005 Oct 2012 #6
That's a problem with people, not MMT Lefty Thinker Oct 2012 #7
MMT holds that a dollar bill or a bank deposit has value because you have to have it to pay taxes Sam1 Oct 2012 #8

OSPREYXIV

(74 posts)
1. Bravo!
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 10:57 AM
Oct 2012

Thank you for posting this.
An excellent source of information about macroeconomic policy is Michael Hudson's
website.

Lefty Thinker

(96 posts)
2. It took me six months
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 11:12 AM
Oct 2012

of searching to find this answer to some of the self-contradictions I was hearing from mainstream macroeconomists. The best site I've found for information on how monetary systems like ours work is Bill Mitchell's Billy Blog. He and Randall Wray are writing an introductory economics textbook together that due out in the next year or so that explains economics through the Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) paradigm.

As a side note, it is possible to use MMT right now to make a bunch of money in the market (if you have seed funds) -- just find cases where MMT diverges widely in it's predictions from the mainstream economists (like when they said that having the US credit rating lowered would increase Treasury yields) and bet on MMT.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
3. The problem with MMT is that it ignores the psychological side of things.
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 11:28 AM
Oct 2012

Many MMTers are former Austrian Schoolers, who have the same blind spot when it comes to the irrational psychology of economic actors.

Often in Economics belief often trumps reality, especially with average people who have a hard time with many economic abstractions. The reason people act as if though the limitations of a commodity currency remain, and the reason you have a lot of people who are Gold Bug crackpots, is because commodity currency is "concrete" and easily comprehended. The realities of a fiat currency are very abstract and esoteric, and for the most part incomprehensible to the average idiot on the street.

Sam1

(498 posts)
4. I Know what you are saying.
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 12:02 PM
Oct 2012

However this is not a problem with MMT. And from what you hear from the "powers that be" it is not a problem restricted to the "average idiot on the street." What MMT lacks is a good, easily understood narrative that changes the understanding and leaders the preach it. If that happens it will not change the Gold Bug crackpots but they will disappear one funeral at a time. The rest however will follow and supply rationals, either right or wrong, that they understand.

Another issue is the constant bombardment of budget hysteria that comes from organizations funded by the malefactors of great wealth (yes, I know where that came from). The well funded preachers in this case are on the other side.



Lefty Thinker

(96 posts)
5. That seems a little bit like arguing against the germ theory
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 12:25 PM
Oct 2012

of infection because "everybody knows colds are caused by bad spirits." MMT leaves room for the private and external sectors to behave as they will, rational or irrational. It also explains what will happen if the government behaves irrationally and gently suggests avoiding such situations.

I don't look at MMT as a model but as an approach. It doesn't tell me how people will react in the short term, but I'm more concerned about the long term anyway. Any irrational action in the private or external sectors will, given a rational response from the government, produce incentives to swing back to rationality.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
6. Pathogens exist outside of human social reality.
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 01:57 PM
Oct 2012

A dollar bill or a gold coin is only worth something because people subjectively think it has worth, value does not exist outside of human minds. Objectively, a dollar bill is just a sheet of cellulose fibers, a coin is just a lump of metal. their value as currency is not inherent in the substance, value is projected onto them by our minds and the sociological context our minds exist in.

To put it bluntly, any policies inspired by MMT must be disguised to look compatible with the orthodox view of currency, otherwise it will be rejected by the majority who are simply incapable of thinking of currency in any other way. MMT is so abstract that most people cannot comprehend it.

Lefty Thinker

(96 posts)
7. That's a problem with people, not MMT
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 02:36 PM
Oct 2012

When the theory correctly describes reality (within measurement error), a scientist does not discard the theory because people won't understand it. It may be that continued financial crisis will, by providing contrary evidence, discredit neoliberal economic paradigms and send politicians in search of any other model to try. If they hear about MMT and decide to experiment with it -- do a little science in the public realm -- and find that it does work even if they and their constituents don't understand why, then maybe we can put our economy on a stable basis.

Sam1

(498 posts)
8. MMT holds that a dollar bill or a bank deposit has value because you have to have it to pay taxes
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:20 AM
Oct 2012

and taxes and the penalties for nonpayment are an objective reality.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Government is differe...