Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Chris Hedges: Criminalizing Dissent
from truthdig:
Criminalizing Dissent
Posted on Aug 13, 2012
By Chris Hedges
I was on the 15th floor of the Southern U.S. District Court in New York in the courtroom of Judge Katherine Forrest on Tuesday. It was the final hearing in the lawsuit I brought in January against President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. I filed the suit, along with lawyers Carl J. Mayer and Bruce I. Afran, over Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). We were late joined by six co-plaintiffs including Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg.
This section of the NDAA, signed into law by Obama on Dec. 31, 2011, obliterates some of our most important constitutional protections. It authorizes the executive branch to order the military to seize U.S. citizens deemed to be terrorists or associated with terrorists. Those taken into custody by the military, which becomes under the NDAA a domestic law enforcement agency, can be denied due process and habeas corpus and held indefinitely in military facilities. Any activist or dissident, whose rights were once protected under the First Amendment, can be threatened under this law with indefinite incarceration in military prisons, including our offshore penal colonies. The very name of the law itselfthe Homeland Battlefield Billsuggests the totalitarian credo of endless war waged against enemies within the homeland as well as those abroad.
The essential thrust of the NDAA is to create a system of justice that violates the separation of powers, Mayer told the court. (The Obama administration has) taken detention out of the judicial branch and put it under the executive branch.?
In May, Judge Forrest issued a temporary injunction invalidating Section 1021 as a violation of the First and Fifth amendments. It was a courageous decision. Forrest will decide within a couple of weeks whether she will make the injunction permanent. .......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/criminalizing_dissent_20120813/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1641 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Hedges: Criminalizing Dissent (Original Post)
marmar
Aug 2012
OP
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. du rec. nt
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)2. Not many comments on this one--
Kinda leaves ya speechless, donnit?
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)3. Hording seven days of food will wipe out the Mormons.
Uncle Joe
(58,328 posts)4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)5. kick and rec nt