Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:13 AM

TPM: Ron Paul Doesn’t Appeal To Evangelicals? Polls Say Otherwise

By: Kyle Leighton December 30, 2011, 5:01 AM

The Iowa GOP caucuses, the home field of the social conservative — where former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee turned out the evangelical vote on his way to a victory, and where noted religious activists can be just the endorsement a campaign needs to win the first state in the primary process. In 2008.

The evangelical vote in Iowa this year has been hard to pin down. Or rather, it’s been moving from candidate to candidate during the various surges in the state, mirroring the more general faction of GOP voters that would like to nominate anyone but Mitt Romney. But as the January third caucuses approach, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) has moved to the top of the heap…presenting pundits with a problem. The conventional wisdom is that Paul can’t or won’t make a play for those voters — that they are strictly the territory of Christian firebrand candidates Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum (R).

Except, the numbers show evangelical voters haven’t coalesced around any of those candidates. And Paul, who has never actually suffered with this voting bloc, is picking up more and more as he rises to the top in Iowa.

<snip>

So the Iowa caucuses may again pick a very conservative candidate with little to no chance of actually getting the nod. But this time, it might be a candidate who wants to take out the Federal Reserve, not go to war on gay marriage.

Read the article at TPM.com

6 replies, 2168 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

6 replies	Author	Time	Post
TPM: Ron Paul Doesn’t Appeal To Evangelicals? Polls Say Otherwise (Original post)	City Lights	Dec 2011	OP
Ron Paul named his son	Frances	Dec 2011	#1
It doesn't make any sense at all.	City Lights	Dec 2011	#2
Paul is in fact fanatically anti-abortion	LeftishBrit	Dec 2011	#5
His views may be just as bad as the others',	City Lights	Dec 2011	#6
I grew up around evangelicals.	morningglory	Dec 2011	#3
There's a natural affinity there among people who glorify a golden past that never was	Bucky	Dec 2011	#4

Response to City Lights (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:07 PM

Frances (8,493 posts)

1. Ron Paul named his son

Rand after Ayn Rand.

I thought Ayn Rand didn't believe in religion.

Certainly her philosophy was the exact opposite of Jesus' teachings.

Reply to this post

Response to Frances (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:20 PM

City Lights (25,171 posts)

2. It doesn't make any sense at all.

I would expect most of the evangelical support to be split between Perry and Santorum. I do not understand why so many are throwing their weight behind Paul.

Reply to this post

Response to City Lights (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:00 PM

LeftishBrit (40,900 posts)

5. Paul is in fact fanatically anti-abortion

It doesn't surprise me that the more fanatical right-wing evangelicals would support him.

However, even speaking as an atheist, it's sad that current religious extremists seem to think that Jesus' main concerns were abortion and homosexuality, and seem to totally ignore what the Gospels said about wealth and poverty.

Reply to this post

Response to LeftishBrit (Reply #5)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 06:45 PM

City Lights (25,171 posts)

6. His views may be just as bad as the others',

but he doesn't come across as "preachy" as some of the other candidates. For example, Santorum can't open his mouth without uttering some anti-gay bullshit. One gets the feeling that weaving his religious views into the government is Santorum's only issue. It's not like that with Paul.

I wholeheartedly agree with your second paragraph.

Reply to this post

Response to City Lights (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:59 PM

morningglory (2,336 posts)

3. I grew up around evangelicals.

What attracts them to the GOP is their fearful, hateful, greedy, racist nature (with feelings of superiority). They are not all like this, by any means. They will vote for whatever the GOP puts out there. Right now they are just expressing their choice preferences but they will vote for any adulterer, thief, liar, mormon, nutjob, whatever the GOP offers.

Reply to this post

Response to City Lights (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:20 PM

Bucky (52,825 posts)

4. There's a natural affinity there among people who glorify a golden past that never was

As long as a candidate communicates that we should fear the future, they'll have some appeal among conservatives.

Reply to this post

Editorials & Other Articles (Forum)