Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,280 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:55 PM Jul 2012

Judges Skeptical Of Claim That Texas Voter ID Law Does Not Disenfranchise Minorities

By Guest Blogger on Jul 17, 2012 at 11:30 am
Our Guest Blogger is Billy Corriher, Associate Director of Research for Legal Progress.

Faced with data suggesting over a million eligible voters could be disenfranchised by a new Voter ID law, the state of Texas was grilled on Friday by the three-judge panel hearing its lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires states with a history of racial discrimination in voting to “pre-clear” election law changes with DOJ, and Texas filed suit in a D.C. federal court after DOJ refused to approve the Voter ID law. The judges were skeptical that Texas had met its burden of showing that DOJ should have cleared the Voter ID law as non-discriminatory, with one judge arguing the statute’s “burden falls disproportionately on minorities . . . .”

Studies have shown that millions of Americans may be disenfranchised by new Voter ID measures pushed by Republican state legislators. These laws will have a disproportionate impact on the poor, the elderly, and minorities. As many as 25% of black voters could be disenfranchised by Voter ID laws, and Attorney General Eric Holder has called such measures a “poll tax.” Texas presented expert testimony to counter DOJ’s statistics, but even the one Republican-appointed judge on the panel said the state’s expert “took enormous hits” during cross-examination.

Texas’s Voter ID law was pushed through the legislature under a streamlined process “against a backdrop of huge Hispanic growth.” Roughly 90 percent of the state’s population growth in the last decade can be attributed to minorities. Attorneys for Texas voters argued this growth in minority voters prompted state legislators to pass the Voter ID bill.

Supporters of Voter ID laws say the requirement to show identification when voting will help prevent voter fraud. But even an investigation by the Texas’ attorney general could not point to any recent examples of proven voter fraud. True voter fraud is extraordinarily rare, and even proponents of Voter ID laws cannot provide examples. This is a solution in search of a problem ...

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/17/528221/judges-skeptical-of-claim-that-texas-voter-id-law-does-not-disenfranchise-minorities/?mobile=nc

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges Skeptical Of Claim That Texas Voter ID Law Does Not Disenfranchise Minorities (Original Post) struggle4progress Jul 2012 OP
They should be allowed to enforce their Vioter ID law after this election... rfranklin Jul 2012 #1
Right after they vote disclosure DearAbby Jul 2012 #2
Thankful Republicans Texas-Limerick Jul 2012 #4
Kick pinto Jul 2012 #3
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
1. They should be allowed to enforce their Vioter ID law after this election...
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:59 PM
Jul 2012

and after they have set up a system to provide no fee IDs to every voter. Birth certificates should be made available without charge and a large state bureacracy should be created to make sure it gets done.

DearAbby

(12,461 posts)
2. Right after they vote disclosure
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 04:02 PM
Jul 2012

all millionaires purchasing our government via Citizen's United....We'll show you our papers, when you show us yours.

 

Texas-Limerick

(93 posts)
4. Thankful Republicans
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 08:04 PM
Jul 2012

You'll no longer draw a blank
Trying to identify all of your voters
If you only knew who to thank
But they were anonymous donors 

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Judges Skeptical Of Claim...