Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Starbucks: Unhappy About Customers Ordering Drinks Under the Name 'Union Strong'
- Daily Kos, May 5, 2022.
Starbucks keeps escalating its anti-union campaign, taking it ever more public and more blatant. From quietly shifting national-level managers into the first stores where workers organized, to firing pro-union workers, to interim CEO Howard Schultz whining volubly about the assault on Starbucks, the company has ratcheted up and up, and its not stopping. This week, Starbucks announced pay raises and new benefits, including improved sick leave and credit card tippingbut not at stores where workers are organizing. Its a direct bribe/threat: Stay quiet, and well be nice. Organize, and get the short end of the stick.
RELATED STORY: Starbucks CEO whines that companies are being 'assaulted ... by the threat of unionization'
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/4/5/2090217/-Starbucks-CEO-whines-that-companies-are-being-assaulted-by-the-threat-of-unionization
Starbucks claimed that it would be illegal to unilaterally change conditions where workers are organizing, but Matthew Bodie, a law professor and former National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) lawyer, told The New York Times, If Starbucks said, Drop the union campaign and youll get this wage increase and better benefits, thatd clearly be illegal, and its Hard to see how this is that much different in practice. Starbucks Workers United has filed an unfair labor practice complaint over the companys action, and has explained that while the company cant unilaterally impose changes on a store thats unionized, it can and should offer the changes to the union. Thats telling: Starbucks management is claiming that if it cant act unilaterally, it cant act at all, when really its time to start engaging the union as a bargaining counterpart.
Starbucks also took action against its own union-supporting customers. Many customers have been expressing support for the union by ordering under names like Union Strong. Starbucks is done putting up with that, instructing managers to not call out the names on those orders. Starbucks even acknowledged, in a recent government filing, that Our responses to any union organizing efforts could negatively impact how our brand is perceived and have adverse effects on our business, including on our financial results. The company knows this might not be so great for its image. And its not working. But executives are so committed to it that theyre even trying to silence customers.
About that its not working part: The union has a 90% win rate, according to a recent NLRB graph flagged by Steven Greenhouse. In recent days, that includes wins in several southern locations, including Tallahassee, Florida; Boone, North Carolina; and Farmville, Virginia, following an earlier win in Augusta, Georgia. On top of that, votes were held in four Massachusetts locations, and the union got a clean sweep, along with wins in Massapequa and Brooklyn, New York; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Plover, Wisconsin; and Summit, New Jersey. While many of the union wins have been blowouts, the few losses have largely had very close margins, and some votes remain uncalled because the number of challenged ballots could shift the outcome...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/5/5/2094771/-Starbucks-is-very-unhappy-about-all-the-customers-ordering-drinks-under-the-name-Union-Strong
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 2085 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Starbucks: Unhappy About Customers Ordering Drinks Under the Name 'Union Strong' (Original Post)
appalachiablue
May 2022
OP
Faux pas
(14,645 posts)1. Ha Ha Ha
appalachiablue
(41,105 posts)2. Righto, solidarity!
Faux pas
(14,645 posts)3. I'm
retired and I still voluntarily pay union dues. Gotta stay strong and united!
appalachiablue
(41,105 posts)4. Good for you! Unions, democracy in the workplace.
hlthe2b
(102,141 posts)5. So, order under "Norma Rae!"
appalachiablue
(41,105 posts)7. Great one, ha!
XanaDUer2
(10,557 posts)6. Burned, stinky-fish coffee smell nt
Response to appalachiablue (Original post)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hekate
(90,565 posts)9. Mother Jones, your latte is ready for pick-up!
Solidarity forever.