Biden could make life miserable for Manchin and Sinema. And he should.
Two Democratic senators, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, made a choice Wednesday night to side with the 50 Senate Republicans to block changes to the Senates filibuster rule and, thus, prevent Democrats from passing voting rights legislation. What happened on the Senate floor was more than just a vote on a Senate rule; Manchin and Sinema chose to preserve the filibuster over preserving our democracy.
President Joe Biden must display his commitment to the Black community to whom he promised to always have their back.
For their choice, there must be political consequences. And those consequences must not just come from the grass roots which is already happening but also from President Joe Biden, who must display his commitment to members of the Black community to whom he promised to always have their back.
Of course, voting rights are not just an issue for the Black community. The GOP wishes to silence the voice of anyone who opposes the party, but their vote-diluting, vote-suppressing and potentially vote-rigging measures disproportionately affect people of color, especially Black Americans. Thats why civil rights groups have been raising alarm bells for months to get Biden to focus on voting rights.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-could-make-life-miserable-for-manchin-and-sinema-and-he-should/ar-AAT22xj
JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)Biden appointed 42 judges in his first year, and that could not be done without Sinema and Manchin
The best strategy is to win more seats in the Senate, not personally attacking Sinema and Manchin with a 50-50 Senate
dpibel
(2,831 posts)Assuredly, increasing the Democratic majority in the Senate is critical.
Do you think that criticizing Manchin and Sinema will depress the Democratic vote in other states?
Because, as various defenders of those two have pointed out many times: Neither is up for reelection this year.
TBH, I think one of the best campaign strategies available for senatorial candidates trying to flip seats is to promise to, unlike Sinema and Manchin, support the president's agenda. As in, "Want to help Joe Biden succeed? Make Joe and Kyrsten irrelevant."
Nictuku
(3,605 posts)If either of them switched parties, it would be immediate. Majority would pass to Moscow Mitch. That is too big a risk.
There will come a time, but it is not now. We can't make the Biden Administration any weaker than what it has with a dang 50/50 split.
All focus goes to the 2 damn senators who would not vote with their party on certain bills. Focus /should/ be on the 50 Republicans. That is a messaging issue, and the Democrats should do better. It is a fight for our life.
If McConnell gets Leadership of the Senate again, he has total control over everything that comes to the floor (or not), he has control over what Committees do, and the Republicans get a Majority on all Committees. And you know what they will do.
That is too much a risk, and will totally waste the next 3 years that Biden has as President, and(what we all have to work for) is to give him the Congress he needs to get the job done.
I wish we could all come together on this sentiment. This is not a drill. This is real, and scary.
Fascism. Brown shirts to ferret out voters. Fuck. I'm freaked out, but want to think sensibly.
Sinema and Manchin will have their time for accountability.
Yes, I am an optimist. I have no other choice.
JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)dpibel
(2,831 posts)As I expressed below, I agree with what I believe to be the consensus: Both Sinema and Manchin are getting big jollies out of the attention and power.
If either goes dark side, that power and attention is over.
Along with their political careers, because, in today's world of Total Trump Loyalty Oaths, no trumper is going to vote for a former Satanist...er...Democrat.
There was a post earlier today, or yesterday, retailing a story that Sinema totally loved the approbation she got after her thumbs-down curtsey performance.
Why would she bolt to Mitch's side where she'd be nothing but a vote?
JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)result
As for your question, why would she or Manchin bolt?
Because it is possible they dont want to put up with the personal attacks, and for those who think they wouldnt switch because they enjoy the attention, I dont think it is worth the risk, and there is no doubt McConnell would welcome them with open arms.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)As it stands, right now, Biden can't get anything passed. If the GQP had control, it would be easy and credible for our party to run our 2022 campaign on "stopping Republican obstruction of the President's agenda."
Instead of it being "Republicans' fault," the conventional wisdom is that all the blame falls on two Democrats -- and on Biden for being "too weak" to get them to go along. That's not a good narrative to encourage people to vote Democratic in November. If anything, it will depress turnout, because "we voted the Democrats in, and what have they accomplished?"
A 50/50 split such as we have now is, if anything, the worst position to be in. We still can't get stuff done, and we can't even blame it on the Republicans blocking us, because, if we all hung together, it wouldn't matter what they do. Heads, they win; tails, we lose.
JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)and Sinema
onenote
(42,694 posts)How many times would she have had that opportunity if Manchin and/or Sinema weren't voting with Democrats? Zero.
So I guess since her tie breaking votes don't "get stuff done" she should just not even bother, right?
rso
(2,271 posts)We need to tread carefully and not force these two deplorables into formally joining with Moscow Mitch. Why would we want to see Moscow Mitch as Majority Leader ?
dpibel
(2,831 posts)Neither is likely to bolt (officially) to the dark side. Once they do, they have no significance.
I mean, I suppose they could switch to gumming up Mitch's agenda, but that's not going to get them the attention they crave because Mitch's agenda, after all, is gumming things up.
Nictuku
(3,605 posts)Really, I do.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)motivated by attention seeking. Manchin is motivated by business interests and being from a very conservative state. Cinema's interests come from the huge funding that she gets from conservative sources.
Either one of them could benefit from switching. The motion that they are in it for the attention is a myth, the result of armchair psychologists and wishful thinking.
Trueblue1968
(17,205 posts)Dems are getting disgusted at M and S's actions.
JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)appointments
NCjack
(10,279 posts)JohnSJ
(92,136 posts)could switch parties
Slammer
(714 posts)"Dems are getting disgusted at M and S's actions."
I think you have that backwards: Democrats are disgusted by S & M.
Moebym
(989 posts)Here's mine:
Take aim at Republicans. Don't add any more fuel to the media's "Democrats in Disarray" narrative by putting public pressure on the two clowns, because the perception of infighting is a projection of weakness.
Ignore the clowns. That will reduce the likelihood that they will switch parties, and give them less power.
onenote
(42,694 posts)Maybe Obediallah is unaware of the fact that Biden got less than 30 percent of the vote in West Virginia.