HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Editorials & Other Articles (Forum) » Wall Street Journal compa...

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 07:30 PM

Wall Street Journal compares Trump to 'a drunk' clinging to 'an empty gin bottle'

in scathing editorial. Mar 21, 2017


'The words of President Donald Trump and his White House staff are, in no small way, a matter of national security and credibility, and those things have entered a danger zone, a Wall Street Journal editorial argued on Tuesday.

The conservative-leaning editorial board pointed to Trump's debunked claim that domestic and international entities had colluded with the Obama administration to spy on Trump's campaign during the 2016 presidential election.'>>>

https://www.businessinsider.com/was-trump-wiretapped-credibility-sean-spicer-wsj-editorial-2017-3?

8 replies, 1484 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Wall Street Journal compares Trump to 'a drunk' clinging to 'an empty gin bottle' (Original post)
elleng Thursday OP
ZZenith Thursday #1
Thomas Hurt Thursday #2
dweller Thursday #3
John Fante Thursday #4
guillaumeb Thursday #5
NNadir Thursday #7
guillaumeb Thursday #8
BeckyDem Thursday #6

Response to elleng (Original post)


Response to elleng (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 07:36 PM

2. Oh noes, the WSJ disssed Dear Leader. They must be the failing WSJ now I guess...lol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 07:43 PM

3. conclusion

The editorial board concluded: "If he doesn't show more respect for the truth, most Americans may conclude he's a fake president."

✌🏼

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 07:43 PM

4. Trunpfuck never once had an ounce of credibility.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 07:45 PM

5. It took 3 and 1/2 years for the WSJ Editorial Board to reacha conclusion

that millions reached in 2017?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to guillaumeb (Reply #5)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 09:13 PM

7. They're very stable geniuses over there in Murdoch land, obviously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NNadir (Reply #7)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 09:38 PM

8. Save us all from these stable geniuses. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 08:12 PM

6. It only took the WSJ nearly four years but they're just about there.

The editorial board concluded: "If he doesn't show more respect for the truth, most Americans may conclude he's a fake president."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread