HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Editorials & Other Articles (Forum) » Top Military Officers Unl...

Thu Oct 31, 2019, 10:35 AM

Top Military Officers Unload on Trump--even the Brass are speaking out!

Long article but to the point.

Top Military Officers Unload on Trump

The commander in chief is impulsive, disdains expertise, and gets his intelligence briefings from Fox News. What does this mean for those on the front lines?


Mark Bowden November 2019 Issue Politics

For most of the past two decades, American troops have been deployed all over the world—to about 150 countries. During that time, hundreds of thousands of young men and women have experienced combat, and a generation of officers have come of age dealing with the practical realities of war. They possess a deep well of knowledge and experience. For the past three years, these highly trained professionals have been commanded by Donald Trump.

To hear more feature stories, see our full list or get the Audm iPhone app.


Military officers are sworn to serve whomever voters send to the White House. Cognizant of the special authority they hold, high-level officers epitomize respect for the chain of command, and are extremely reticent about criticizing their civilian overseers. That those I spoke with made an exception in Trump’s case is telling, and much of what they told me is deeply disturbing. In 20 years of writing about the military, I have never heard officers in high positions express such alarm about a president. Trump’s pronouncements and orders have already risked catastrophic and unnecessary wars in the Middle East and Asia, and have created severe problems for field commanders engaged in combat operations. Frequently caught unawares by Trump’s statements, senior military officers have scrambled, in their aftermath, to steer the country away from tragedy. How many times can they successfully do that before faltering?

Amid threats spanning the globe, from nuclear proliferation to mined tankers in the Persian Gulf to terrorist attacks and cyberwarfare, those in command positions monitor the president’s Twitter feed like field officers scanning the horizon for enemy troop movements. A new front line in national defense has become the White House Situation Room, where the military struggles to accommodate a commander in chief who is both ignorant and capricious. In May, after months of threatening Iran, Trump ordered the carrier group led by the USS Abraham Lincoln to shift from the Mediterranean Sea to the Persian Gulf. On June 20, after an American drone was downed there, he ordered a retaliatory attack—and then called it off minutes before it was to be launched. The next day he said he was “not looking for war” and wanted to talk with Iran’s leaders, while also promising them “obliteration like you’ve never seen before” if they crossed him. He threatened North Korea with “fire and fury” and dispatched a three-aircraft-carrier flotilla to waters off the Korean peninsula—then he pivoted to friendly summits with Kim Jong Un, with whom he announced he was “in love”; canceled long-standing U.S. military exercises with South Korea; and dangled the possibility of withdrawing American forces from the country altogether. While the lovefest continues for the cameras, the U.S. has quietly uncanceled the canceled military exercises, and dropped any mention of a troop withdrawal.

Such rudderless captaincy creates the headlines Trump craves. He revels when his tweets take off. (“Boom!” he says. “Like a rocket!”) Out in the field, where combat is more than wordplay, his tweets have consequences. He is not a president who thinks through consequences—and this, the generals stressed, is not the way serious nations behave.

The generals I spoke with didn’t agree on everything, but they shared the following five characterizations of Trump’s military leadership.


Trump has little interest in the details of policy. He makes up his mind about a thing, and those who disagree with him—even those with manifestly more knowledge and experience—are stupid, or slow, or crazy.

As a personal quality, this can be trying; in a president, it is dangerous. Trump rejects the careful process of decision making that has long guided commanders in chief. Disdain for process might be the defining trait of his leadership. Of course, no process can guarantee good decisions—history makes that clear—but eschewing the tools available to a president is choosing ignorance. What Trump’s supporters call “the deep state” is, in the world of national security—hardly a bastion of progressive politics—a vast reservoir of knowledge and global experience that presidents ignore at their peril. The generals spoke nostalgically of the process followed by previous presidents, who solicited advice from field commanders, foreign-service and intelligence officers, and in some cases key allies before reaching decisions about military action. As different as George W. Bush and Barack Obama were in temperament and policy preferences, one general told me, they were remarkably alike in the Situation Room: Both presidents asked hard questions, wanted prevailing views challenged, insisted on a variety of options to consider, and weighed potential outcomes against broader goals. Trump doesn’t do any of that. Despite commanding the most sophisticated intelligence-gathering apparatus in the world, this president prefers to be briefed by Fox News, and then arrives at decisions without input from others.

One prominent example came on December 19, 2018, when Trump announced, via Twitter, that he was ordering all American forces in Syria home.

“We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump presidency,” he tweeted. Later that day he said, “Our boys, our young women, our men, they are all coming back, and they are coming back now.”

This satisfied one of Trump’s campaign promises, and it appealed to the isolationist convictions of his core supporters. Forget the experts, forget the chain of command—they were the people who, after all, had kept American forces engaged in that part of the world for 15 bloody years without noticeably improving things. Enough was enough..........

8 replies, 1688 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to riversedge (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2019, 10:40 AM

1. My son(AF) is being deployed to Qatar January 1st, it all

is so frightening to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to dewsgirl (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 1, 2019, 04:28 AM

5. he will be fine in Qatar, dewsgirl


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Skittles (Reply #5)

Fri Nov 1, 2019, 06:47 AM

6. Thank you, I was worried before. But now with his his Syria

stunt and deploying troops to Saudi Arabia, he will be right there. I know it sounds awful, but I didn't want him to enlist, because of Trump being so unpredictable and then watching the last couple months unfold it has been a real nightmare.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to dewsgirl (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 1, 2019, 04:03 PM

7. I can understand your angst with that nitwit parading as "Commander in Chief"

but.....I'm sure by now the military knows he's a Putin-loving nitwit, and there's a lot of behind the scenes actions going on to protect the troops from his erratic decisions

I'm a USAF vet

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Skittles (Reply #7)

Fri Nov 1, 2019, 04:10 PM

8. I hang my hopes on that each and everyday. Thank you for

your service and replying, you made me feel a little better.
I just moved up here between Eglin and Hurlburt AFB's to be with my son and help take care of my granddaughter and pregnant DIL. I am learning a lot about the Air Force at the moment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to riversedge (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2019, 10:42 AM

2. Now what other world leader thought he knew more than his experienced offficers

and conducted a major war at whim and without a plan, crushing any dissent as treasonous?

Could it be the fellow with the funny mustache who killed himself in a Berlin bunker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to riversedge (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2019, 12:39 PM

3. DFT is slowly losing across many areas, the military is just one of them

The number of people in these groups who support DFT is shrinking at a rapid pace:

* Women
* Vets
* Active duty military
* Blacks
* Hispanics
* Farmers

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to RainCaster (Reply #3)

Thu Oct 31, 2019, 03:05 PM

4. How about the bikers?

He'll always have the racists. Adolph still does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread