If George Zimmerman were on trial, which evidence about the shooting could a jury hear?
Which evidence about the shooting of Trayvon Martin could a jury hear?
By Emily Bazelon|Posted Monday, April 2, 2012, at 4:55 PM ET
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/04/if_george_zimmerman_goes_on_trial_for_killing_trayvon_martin_what_could_the_jury_hear_.html
1. The 911 calls reporting Martins shooting. Yes, the calls would be admitted at trial911 calls are always important in cases like these. I still want to know whether voice recognition software can tell us whether it is Martins or Zimmermans voice we hear pleading for help on the calls. So far, experts have said they dont think the voice on the call is Zimmermans.
2. The police surveillance video of Zimmerman taken after the shooting. At first glance, the video seems to belie Zimmermans story that Martin slammed his head against the ground, leaving him seriously hurt. But Zimmermans father said the video was taken after medics cleaned up his son, and ABC today released enhanced digitalization that, according to one of its reporters, shows what appear to be a pair of gashes or welts on Zimmermans head.
3. The account of the funeral director who prepared Martins body for burial. He told CBS that he could see no physical signs that there had been a scuffle or there had been a fight. You know, on the hands, I didnt see any knuckles bruised, and that is something we would have covered up if it had been there.
4. The account of Martins girlfriend. She was on the phone with him in the minutes before he died (and , unbelievably, the police hadnt interviewed her as of late last week, according to the Martin familys lawyers). The girlfriend says Martin told her, "I think this dude is following me," momentarily thought hed lost Zimmerman, and then said: "He is right behind me again. I'm not going to run, I'm going to walk fast." The girlfriend claims she next heard another voice say, What are you doing around here? to which Martin answered, Why are you following me?" She then heard Martin get pushed and sounds as if his phone was hitting the ground.
DocMac
(1,628 posts)It was said on cnn today that an expert was able to filter all the background noise away, including the woman that made the call about the screams for help. This expert matched Zimmerman's voive from the other 911 calls and has claimed that in no way was Zimmerman the person yelling for help.
This is all I need to know!
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)Right Tameetcha! hope to read many more of your opinions and posts
DocMac
(1,628 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)DocMac
(1,628 posts)But if several specialists can agree that the person screaming for help was Trayvon, it's a big step forward.
I can't get past the fact that the screaming stopped as soon as the gunshot was heard.
Skittles
(153,120 posts)where are the photographs of Zimmerman's supposed injuries and the supposed contusions that would be on Trayvon's hands if said injuries existed???
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Kablooie
(18,612 posts)and once he said it was self defense the police must stop any further processing of information regarding the case according to Fla. law and walk away.
Skittles
(153,120 posts)it looks like they just TOOK HIS WORD on it
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)Skittles
(153,120 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)The FBI were knocking on doors today asking what anyone saw. I don't think the cops even did that.
So who knows how many more witnesses can turn up.
DocMac
(1,628 posts)A man who thinks that he was protecting the neighborhood saw something. He saw what looked like a black man that he did not recognize. He goes on to say that this guy MUST be on drugs or something.
Even though he was advised to not engage the man, he does anyway. The man (knowing he was followed) feared the person who approached him. Maybe he didn't see that Zimmerman had some authority to do so and saw him as a threat. Whatever scuffle broke out. once Trayvon saw the gun, he started screaming for his life.
I'm willing to bet $50 that this is what happened.
_Orion
(3 posts)If the FBI is involved, does this mean that this case is a hate crime now?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They might be just sniffing around to see if either apply. Or they may be investigating the PD.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)She cant testify what Trayvon said, that is hearsay. She can testify what she said to him and what she heard as far as a scuffle, and of course she can be cross examined by the defense. Time of the call can be submitted as evidence. Of course, if there is a recording of the call, that can be admitted, but I doubt one exists.
_Orion
(3 posts)Not sure, but, why would Zimmerman's account can be accepted, but not hers? -- I believe Trayvon's girlfriend account is just as valid as Zimmerman's.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)And welcome to DU! Looking forward to getting to know you!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If he gives it on the witness stand himself. No way his lawyers permit that. All the accounts of his story from family and "friends" is inadmissable, since its hearsay. Thus the family using the media to get their lies out.
marble falls
(57,013 posts)she can't testify about a conversation she wasn't a part of or witness to.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)That would include key documents still being withheld including the EMS report and the autopsy report.
I do not expect CCTV video to be used, since there should be better evidence available including still photos and the clothes themselves.
The mortician observations will be superseded by the autopsy report.
The media is in some cases overusing what it has, making up what it doesn't have, and ignoring what the State Attorney is withholding. Then again, its not like they have any requirement to post/print the truth.
marble falls
(57,013 posts)the jury room or impeached on the stand. He would be a witness in what he saw if not the significance of what he saw. A lot of coroners are not medically trained or forensically trained. In Texas I know of coroners who are the sheriff or judge of the county or even a mortician.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Even in those states where the Coroner is elected without regards to medical qualifications, the autopsies are normally performed by a pathologist.
marble falls
(57,013 posts)autopsies have been thrown out of courts by impeachment through defense experts. The mortician is qualified to testify regarding the condition of a victim's corpse. And the coroner/pathologist can be asked to qualify in re-direct. And the jury will decide where the truth stands. Questionable police procedure can fairly be expected to taint at least to some degree the coroner/pathologist testimony and an unbiased testimony from a mortician can be expected carry a bit more gravitas in that situation.
_Orion
(3 posts)5. Anonymous witness mentioned that the scuffle occurred on the grass, and not on the concrete sidewalk.
6. If Zimmerman shot Trayvon from that close, how come there is no blood spatter on him. There should have been from being that close, and Trayvon being on top.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)for one side or the other, depending on what is or isn't found on it. Also if the bullet was found, then the bullet will be evidence.