Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing
https://shareblue.com/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-state-dinner-travel-ban/Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing
While its not unusual for Supreme Court justices to attend state dinners, it is unusual for state dinners to be held on the eve of such monumental court cases, making Roberts decision to attend a questionable one.
As a guest at the dinner, Roberts was rubbing elbows with the architects of the policy that will be argued in court Wednesday giving the appearance of potential impropriety, particularly if the court comes down with a ruling in favor of the Trump administration.
An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society.
A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved, the Code of Conduct states.
Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law.
Unlike the lower courts, the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has sided with Trump previously and allowed most of his ban to take effect.
While it remains to be seen what will ultimately come of Wednesdays oral arguments, Roberts decision to attend a black-tie affair with the architects of the policy on the eve of its day in court will undoubtedly raise questions about his impartiality or lack thereof.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing (Original Post)
Wwcd
Apr 2018
OP
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. Nothing is normal, nothing is as it should be, it is all chaos
BigmanPigman
(52,855 posts)2. Roberts is not fair and impartial, never has been and never will be.
Amaryllis
(10,252 posts)3. We got him in the first place because SCOTUS handed Bush the 2000 election. So yeah. Never has been
along with the rest of them that handed Bush the election. Gore would not have chosen Roberts.
Volaris
(10,813 posts)4. It doesn't look good no..
IF on the other hand, the decision comes back against the administration, I'd bet even money after odd that Roberts way of telling Trump and his crew of criminals 'fuck you. We're the supreme goddamn court and we aren't bought off as easily as a good meal and a social event.'