Bernie Sanders Just Gave the Progressive Foreign-Policy Speech We've Been Waiting For
The senator powerfully linked domestic and foreign policy in the context of massive global inequality.
By Stephen Miles TODAY 2:16 PM
Excerpt:
At the heart of his speech was the argument that the divide between domestic and foreign policy is not only artificial but also counterproductive. An expansive view of foreign policy—not merely as the idea of what happens over there, but also as part of who we are here at home—challenges us to enlarge our own thinking. Foreign policy, in Sanders’s argument, is not just about whether we go to war or not. It is about our democracy at home; it is about climate change; it is about global oligarchy; and it is about how American leadership can come together and solve the challenges we face through diplomacy.
Sanders rightly connects the dots between an exploding Pentagon budget and Republican attempts to take health care away from tens of millions of Americans in the name of fiscal responsibility. He makes clear that a progressive foreign policy also means that “We cannot convincingly promote democracy abroad if we do not live it vigorously here at home.” And in the way he does so well, Sanders reminds us that no progressive view of the world can tolerate the massive wealth inequality both here and around the world.
After reframing the issue, Sanders dives into the meat of the matter in a way that should ring true for every progressive. He reminds us that hundreds of millions live in poverty, dying of preventable diseases, while arms makers rake in trillions from weapons of war. He reminds us that America’s history of interventions—from Iran to Chile to right now in Yemen—have a habit of having devastating results. And he reminds us that there is a path between endless war and isolationism, that America’s greatest successes came when it helped support not just our allies but also our former enemies, as we did with the Marshall Plan.
To bring this all home, Sanders points to two diametrically opposed visions of American foreign policy that played out in recent years. In reminding us of the horrors of the Iraq War and juxtaposing it with the unbridled success of the Iran nuclear deal, Bernie helps make clear that this is not some esoteric debate. These are debates happening right now, here in Washington, about just what path our nation should choose to confront the challenges we face abroad.
https://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-just-gave-the-progressive-foreign-policy-speech-weve-been-waiting-for/
= new reply since forum marked as read
is left uncriticized by some here. 
As for "influence", Bernie will have no more or less than any other non-repuke senator in Trump's regime.
but the fact that anyone could conclude that Bernie might 'just in it for himself" baffles me and tells me that person knows nothing about the man His lifelong embrace of the common good over personal gain is a matter of record, not opinion. As one example, he's been, for the vast majority of his time in the Senate, the POOREST person in it, so he's clearly not in it for the money..
This being the case, I'm curious as to what -- for himself -- you think he's "just in it for"? 
