Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 05:50 PM Dec 2011

Bradley Manning Hearing: Court Told of Iraq Unit's Intelligence Security Chaos

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/12/18-2

A shocking lack of basic discipline and intelligence security at the unit in which Bradley Manning worked before his arrest for allegedly transferring the largest trove of state secrets in American history to WikiLeaks has been revealed at his pre-trial hearing in Fort Meade, Maryland.

Under cross-examination by Manning's defence team, the head of the intelligence unit at the military base in Iraq where Manning was posted painted a picture of staggeringly loose controls. Soldiers were allowed to store movies on secure computer databases, were permitted to bring in commercial music CDs to areas where secure computers were in operation, DVDs were left strewn about and there was no system for checking that classified information was not removed from the building.

Captain Steven Lim told the hearing that he was shocked when he was presented with a set of memorandums from Manning's immediate supervisor, Master Sergeant Paul Atkins. The memorandums chronicled emotional behaviour on Manning's behalf dating back to before he was deployed to Iraq in October 2009.

Yet Atkins did not warn Lim, or any of his other superiors in the chain of command, about Manning's problems until 3 June 2010 – after his May 25 arrest. The memorandums gave details of an email that Manning had sent Atkins in April that year in which the soldier confessed that he was suffering severe psychological problems including gender identification disorder that was making it difficult for him to do his job, to interact with other people or even to think.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bradley Manning Hearing: Court Told of Iraq Unit's Intelligence Security Chaos (Original Post) xchrom Dec 2011 OP
The whole Bradley Manning saga reminds me of an Orwell quote: marmar Dec 2011 #1
+1 xchrom Dec 2011 #2
It sure seems that way... midnight Dec 2011 #6
K&R n/t DeSwiss Dec 2011 #3
From the start of all this thucythucy Dec 2011 #4
I worked in defense 21 years, saw lots of security theater, all of it bullshit. bemildred Dec 2011 #5
Yes, and his persecution is meant to distract us from the fact EFerrari Dec 2011 #7
I'm an IT type for a large, corporate law firm... markpkessinger Dec 2011 #8
K&R Solly Mack Dec 2011 #9
When the story first broke nadinbrzezinski Dec 2011 #10

marmar

(77,073 posts)
1. The whole Bradley Manning saga reminds me of an Orwell quote:
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 07:06 PM
Dec 2011

[font size="4"]"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."[/font]


thucythucy

(8,045 posts)
4. From the start of all this
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 11:15 PM
Dec 2011

I wondered how on earth an enlisted soldier--whether or not he's with "military intelligence"--could end up with access to hundreds of thousands of classified documents and files.

Now I know--from the looks of this, it was sheer incompetence on the part of the higher-ups.



bemildred

(90,061 posts)
5. I worked in defense 21 years, saw lots of security theater, all of it bullshit.
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 11:28 PM
Dec 2011

Though having a high clearance was often an excellent career move.

So anyway, yeah, I have no problem believng he could get access to all that stuff; I was a sysadmin a lot, and I had access to pretty much anything I wanted, not that I wanted any of it, and that was the norm. I worked on a military network in the late 90s that had open anonymous FTP and Telnet ports for example, no sandbox either, with lots of secret stuff inside, and all of us supposed to have clearances. I suppose they do better these days, but there are always new toys (like thumb drives) coming along and screwing that up.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
7. Yes, and his persecution is meant to distract us from the fact
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 04:54 PM
Dec 2011

that not even the military takes their own security theater seriously despite the fact that they have bankrupted us in its name.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
8. I'm an IT type for a large, corporate law firm...
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 05:52 PM
Dec 2011

... and I thought exactly the same thing. If that kind of breach of security (i.e., a low-level employee who had that kind of extensive access to sensitive information) happened in any of the law firms in which I've worked, the FIRST head to roll with be the MIS/IT director!

The basic principle in most large corporate (including legal) environments when it comes to data security is that any given employee in the organization has exactly as much access to information as that employee needs to do his or her job, and not an iota of access beyond that. The idea that a private would have access to such huge stores of data is simply mind-boggling.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. When the story first broke
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 04:20 AM
Dec 2011

people who worked Intel at one time commented that this had to be the case... that is before seeing any of this.

So my only comment to this is DUH!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Bradley Manning Hearing: ...