Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,865 posts)
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 11:29 PM Apr 2017

Bitter Fight Behind Him, Justice Gorsuch Starts Day With Relish.

'About 10 minutes into the first argument, Justice Gorsuch asked a half-dozen questions in a row. The case, about where Civil Service and discrimination claims may be filed, was “unbelievably complicated,” as Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. noted.

“Who wrote this statute?” Justice Alito asked. “Someone who takes pleasure in pulling wings off of flies?”

But Justice Gorsuch approached the case with relish, and he made what is likely to become one of his signature points, that the court’s job is limited to reading the words of the statute under review.

“Looking at the plain words of the statute,” he told a lawyer, Christopher Landau. “If you could just help me with that.”

Justice Gorsuch grew a little self-conscious as he kept pressing. “I’m sorry for taking up so much time,” he said. “I apologize.”

Later, when Mr. Landau started reading the statutory text aloud, Justice Gorsuch said: “Keep going. Keep going.”

As the lawyer and the justice examined the language together, Mr. Landau, in a tone of pleased surprise, said, “I think I am maybe emphatically agreeing with you.”

Justice Gorsuch welcomed the comment. “I hope so,” he said, to laughter. . .

justice Gorsuch returned to his by now usual refrain. “Why shouldn’t we follow the plain language and the traditional understanding of the word ‘action’?” he asked.'

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/us/politics/justice-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court.html?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bitter Fight Behind Him, Justice Gorsuch Starts Day With Relish. (Original Post) elleng Apr 2017 OP
He should start w shame. His loquaciousness was an Alice11111 Apr 2017 #1
No such thing! elleng Apr 2017 #2
Can you explain how his stolen seat should affect his decision making? sharedvalues Apr 2017 #4
It would have been the right thing to do just before the Alice11111 Apr 2017 #5
Screw Justice Asterisk sharedvalues Apr 2017 #3

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
4. Can you explain how his stolen seat should affect his decision making?
Tue Apr 18, 2017, 07:24 AM
Apr 2017

I think he main decision he should be making is resigning.

If he had honor, he would publicly resign and say Justice Garland should be renominated.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
5. It would have been the right thing to do just before the
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 03:11 AM
Apr 2017

Senate changed the rules. He is not a gentleman, nor does he have empathy, as we have seen. He loves Citizens United.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Bitter Fight Behind Him, ...