The Neocons Are Almost Giddy Over Trumps Syria Strike
The Neocons Are Almost Giddy Over Trumps Syria Strike
Many architects of the Iraq War openly hope Trump will go further in pursuing regime change in Syria and then Iran.
By Jim Lobe, April 12, 2017.
After the pre-dawn cruise-missile strike against Syrias al-Shayrat airfield, neoconservative hawks, many of whom beat the drums for war in Iraq 14 years ago, are feeling the warm spring breezes of renewal and rejuvenation. Suddenly hopeful that Donald Trump may yet be coming around to their worldview, neoconservatives are full of praise for the action, which they (like many liberal interventionists) insist was long overdue.
Not surprisingly, neocons are pressing for more.
The strike, which marked a dramatic reversal by a president who had strongly opposed any similar action by Barack Obama in 2013, coincided with a number of reports that Steve Bannons influence on Trump was on the wane amid intensified infighting between Bannons nationalism and Jared Kushner and Gary Cohns globalism. The potential eclipse of Bannon has only added to the giddiness of the neocons as they anticipate what might now be possible.
For now, at least, its the generals in the form of National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Pentagon chief James Mad Dog Mattis who appear to be masters of the moment both with respect to the decision to strike and the specificity of the target. The principal justification for the strike to uphold the international ban on chemical weapons as opposed to, say, the broader aim of regime change was also narrowly drawn, reflecting the militarys determination to avoid being drawn into yet another Middle East civil war.
More:
http://fpif.org/the-neocons-are-almost-giddy-over-trumps-syria-strike/