Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:04 AM
Night Watchman (743 posts)
The Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Was Totally Overblown
Fred Kaplan, writing in Slate:
The fuss over Hillary Clinton’s email has now proved to be one of the most overhyped news stories of this overhyped news season. Look at Tuesday’s statement by FBI Director James Comey. Ignore his self-righteous, scolding tone. Read the facts he’s uncovered, place them in context, and the conclusion is inescapable: As Gertrude Stein once said of Oakland, California, there’s no there there. There's no "there" there!
|
5 replies, 1536 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Night Watchman | Jul 2016 | OP |
Hoyt | Jul 2016 | #1 | |
Agschmid | Jul 2016 | #3 | |
Cryptoad | Jul 2016 | #2 | |
OnyxCollie | Jul 2016 | #4 | |
BlueMTexpat | Jul 2016 | #5 |
Response to Night Watchman (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:45 AM
Hoyt (47,356 posts)
1. It was also overblown by people trying to bring her down.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #1)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 09:17 AM
Agschmid (28,720 posts)
3. Still is in some places...
Response to Night Watchman (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 05:11 AM
Cryptoad (8,023 posts)
2. "was" ?????
Response to Night Watchman (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 02:50 PM
OnyxCollie (9,958 posts)
4. FOIA avoidance should not be an accepted practice by either party. nt
Response to Night Watchman (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:34 AM
BlueMTexpat (14,746 posts)
5. THIS ...
About those first 30,000 emails, the ones Clinton turned over, the FBI handed them out to auditors at other agencies that might have an interest in the matter, and after months of review they “up-classified” 2,000 emails to confidential. In other words, when Clinton wrote or received those 2,000 emails, she and her correspondents would have had no reason to suspect they were jotting down classified facts. But the reviewers have declared them classified retroactively. Your taxpayer dollars at work.
No, there's no "there" there ... and there NEVER has been. But that truth will not stop the eternal rabbit hole of GOPer investigations of Hillary Clinton ... no matter what she does. Make no mistake, however. This happens/will happen with ANY Dem Presidential candidate who is likely to beat the pants off a GOPer candidate. The saddest thing with Hillary is that all too many self-styled "Dems" go right along with the tactics. The advantage with Hillary is that the detractors have been doing this for the past 25+ years. NOTHING has proven to be true. There are only so many times that a person can cry "Wolf" before they have no credibility whatsoever. But it appears that each new generation has to learn those lessons over again. |