Falk - On (Not) Loving Henry Kissinger
By Richard Falk
Source: Richardfalk.com
May 22, 2016
Kissinger should not be underestimated as an international personality with a sorcerers dark gifts. After all, he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 for his perverse role in Vietnam diplomacy. Kissinger had supported the war from its inception and was known as a strong proponent of the despicable Christmas bombing of North Vietnam. He had earlier joined with Nixon in secretly extending the Vietnam War to Cambodia, incidentally without Congressional knowledge, much less authorization. This led to the total destabilization and devastation of a country that had successfully maintained its neutrality for the prior decade. It also generated the genocidal takeover by the Khmer Rouge in the 1970s resulting in the death of a third of the Cambodian population. It was notable that the Nobel had been jointly awarded to Luc Duc Tho, Kissingers counterpart in the negotiations, who exhibited his dignity by declining the prize, while Kissinger as shameless as ever, accepted and had an assistant deliver his acceptance speech because he was too busy to attend. Significantly, for the first time, two members of the Nobel Selection Committee resigned their position in disgust.
The more familiar, and more damning allegation against Kissinger, is his association with criminal violations of international law. These are convincingly set forth in Christopher Hitchens The Trial of Henry Kissinger (2001). Hitchens informed readers that he confined himself to the identifiable crimes that can and should be placed on a proper bill of indictment. He omitted others. Hitchens lists six major crimes of Kissinger:
1. The deliberate mass killing of civilian population in Indochina.
2. Deliberate collusion in mass murder, and later in assassination in Bangla Desh.
3. The personal suborning and planning of murder, of a senior constitutional officer in a democratic nationChilewith which the United States was not at war.
4. Personal involvement in a plan to murder the head of state in the democratic nation of Cyprus.
5. The incitement and enabling of genocide in East Timor.
6. Personal involvement in a plan to kidnap and murder a journalist living in Washington, DC.
Whether the evidence available would support a conviction in an international tribunal is far from certain, but Kissingers association and approval of these unlawful and inhumane policies, and many others, is clear beyond reasonable doubt.
Full article: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/on-not-loving-henry-kissinger/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Assumptions about ones own omnipotence and omniscience do not lead to good strategy or tactics, they lead to the litany of failure and disfunction which we see.
(And they are hard on everybody else too, yeah.)
JEB
(4,748 posts)and any body associated with the disgusting scum of the earth.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)Such evil, disgusting war criminals on the prowl are what spawn the next generation of satanic scourge.
Cheney was permitted because no one stopped Kissinger from his evil existence.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)that she didn't try to keep him under wraps.
Same with the speeches. She knew she was going to run for president. I have no doubt she didn't even consider how it might look.
It's called hubris.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)loudly denounce Ed Snowden, but have nothing to say
about Kissinger . .
Speaks volumes.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)they will never denounce anything that comes from her. Their silence in this instance is very telling, it tells me they would accept genocide from her. they should ask themselves what if it was Bernie that took Kissinger's advice? How do they look into a mirror?
840high
(17,196 posts)shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)Henry the Death-Eater knew all about Nixon's hijacking of the peace talks LBJ was working on with the North Vietnamese. LBJ decided not to tell the American public which was a colossal mistake in my opinion. On the Nixon tapes, Henry the Death-Eater and Nixon along with Haldeman are talking about the fact that LBJ's folks were right, that even with 1 million troops and ten years, America could not win the war in Viet Nam. And Henry states that we must continue the war to at least 1972 to ensure re-election and then Nixon can take great credit for ending the terrible war. Why in the hell would any politician talk to this man unless we have an oligarchy pretending to be a Republic? The point of invading Viet Nam was because of the fear of China expanding its Communist sphere; and yet Nixon went and made nice with Mao. Chew on that one for a moment.
Nixon was a traitor. That should never be forgotten.
Fuck Kissinger and all who seek his company and counsel.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)anyone else's, but it still really frosts my ass that Kissinger and
Nixon sent me to Vietnam for their own lying and utterly selfish reasons.
Not to mention the additional hundreds of thousands of deaths,
both Vietnamese and American.
That is the main reason I am in Veterans For Peace.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Explains why he's good friends with Hillary and open to Trump's advances.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)being marched out as Clinton's mentor should be an instant disqualification.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)For the life of me, I cannot understand why DU members defend her.