George W. Bush Was AWOL, But What’s “Truth” Got to Do With It?
George W. Bush Was AWOL, But Whats Truth Got to Do With It?
Dan Froomkin
Oct. 27 2015, 9:55 a.m.
The only journalistic sin worse than disastrously misreporting an important story that turns out to be untrue is disastrously misreporting an important story that is true, so no one believes it anymore.
The end result of Dan Rathers half-assed September 2004 report on George W. Bushs already well-chronicled, cowardly, rule-breaking behavior as a young man during the Vietnam War was that Bush, once again, was able to avoid accountability for his conduct, and skated to an election victory over John Kerry, a genuine war hero his lickspittles had successfully smeared as unpatriotic.
So a story that should have taken down a president a story that was already thoroughly documented, but that the mainstream media had hitherto shied away from as overly partisan was instead discredited, never to be heard of again. Never, at least, until a very bad movie called Truth came out this month, trying to get us to see Rather (Robert Redford) and his producer, Mary Mapes (Cate Blanchett), as heroic and wronged, rather than grappling honestly with their journalistic failures.
Rather and Mapes had an obligation to make sure their segment for CBSs 60 Minutes II on Bush using pull to get into the National Guard instead of going to Vietnam and then going AWOL for a chunk of what was supposed to be his service was bulletproof. But it wasnt even bloggerproof. The new documents they got copies of from a source who was cagey about their provenance were debunked by a bunch of Internet sleuths. An independent review commissioned by CBS found that the segment failed to meet CBSs two core principles: accuracy and fairness, and Rather, Mapes and three other staffers were fired or forced to retire.
More:
https://theintercept.com/2015/10/27/george-w-bush-was-awol-but-whats-truth-got-to-do-with-it/