Mayor Bloomberg launches campaign against gun laws
Source: AP
WASHINGTON New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg launched a national campaign against gun laws that he said "justify civilian gun play."
Bloomberg was joined by the leaders from the NAACP, National Urban League and other groups Wednesday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. as he announced "Second Chance on Shoot First."
The campaign aims to repeal or reform the laws that eliminated a person's duty to retreat when threatened with serious bodily harm or death. These laws have passed in 25 states.
Bloomberg said these laws undermined integrity of the justice system, threaten public safety and make it more difficult to prosecute shooters.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120411/us-neighborhood-watch-bloomberg/
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)....and let's add they deny civil rights and due process.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Anyone applauding it should be ashamed of themselves
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Joseph8th
(228 posts)... this is FAR from a new position from him.
We need sensible gun regulation in the U.S. The 2nd Amendment is not the most important... it's at the bottom of my list of favorite Constitutional rights. He wants Stand Your Ground laws repealed.
Can you tell me with a straight face that's a bad thing?
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)No, he wants the vile peasants to not be able to carry guns because that right should be reserved for the rich.
I want SYG laws repealed, but I still despise Bloomberg.
atreides1
(16,070 posts)Too bad he's not a long-time freedom advocate as was shown during the OWS and the spying on American Muslims...not only in NYC but across the river in NJ.
So, yes coming from this man, it's a bad thing!!!
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)I think that in all legal cases, the burden of proof should be on the state to prove guilt, not the Citizen to prove innocence.
Can you tell me with a straight face that's a bad thing?
Ter
(4,281 posts)Go on any Republican board. I'm pretty sure they consider him the definition of RINO.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Ter
(4,281 posts)He was a Republican for a few years. Before that he was a Democrat for longer.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Paladin
(28,246 posts)Bloomberg is one of the few Repubs not adhering to the party's NRA suck-off policy, therefore he must be vilified by the gun militancy movement. No big surprise that you're leading the charge here, Mr. "Progressive"......
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Gun rights are a progressive value...Bloomie is not progressive in the least and his bedfellows are???
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)elleng
(130,857 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Sounds like the cafeteria approach to politics, rights, and freedoms.
elleng
(130,857 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)elleng
(130,857 posts)characterize it any way you want.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Call your cafeteria approach anything you want, it is still picking and choosing according to your biases
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)There are rural liberals who favor gun rights and urban 1&ers like Doomberg who favor gun control.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)like Doomberg?
You don't write very well.
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)It's not that I don't write very well; you just don't understand very well.
polichick
(37,152 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Progressive professor my ass.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)And Bloomie is anything but progressive
Paladin
(28,246 posts)...and all the rest of the "progressives" who champion your favorite cause: right-wing gun militancy in the U.S. Bloomberg is a bona fide moderate, compared to them. But you knew that already, didn't you?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)It is incredibly dishonest of anyone to make such an insinuation/accusation.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And before you make the accusation you've set to go off, no, I don't support the elite 1%, but when you're right, you're right.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)IamK
(956 posts)it's a a person's duty to retreat when threatened with serious bodily harm or death when someone is in your house....
It will get little support from congress period...
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)would rather suck up on the emotional. All this distraction over one death while there are plenty of others dieing for lack of food and health care. It's irrational. I am sure the politicians love this shit because it can be used to distract from the more important problems facing the country. I am sure there are plenty of gun shot deaths that weren't worthy of the news ...especially if they are caused by our soldiers in other countries. So what about all those innocent Iraqi children and families that were killed? Yea ...no one gives a shit about that. That's why I call this ...irrational.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Your weapons industry policies are causing a huge number of deaths in my country.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Dr_Scholl
(212 posts)The guy who has his own team of security guards is criticizing self defense laws? That's rich.
I don't think Bloomberg can open his mouth without being a hypocrite.
Becka2515
(58 posts)If Bloomie would give up his armed guards, he should lead by example. Oh silly me thats only for the peons.
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)Anyone who knows the least bit about Bloomberg knows it meant "against 'stand your ground' laws" but "campaign against gun laws" implies something very different
truthisfreedom
(23,141 posts)I think these "stand your ground" type laws are simply licenses to kill anyone you don't like. They spiraled out of control when they took those protections out of your home or your car and into the street. When you're cornered, you might be justified in defending yourself with lethal force if you feel threatened. But if you're able to run, you run.