Homeland Security: Islamic State poses no specific threat within the United States
Source: Reuters
The United States is not aware of any specific threat to the U.S. homeland from Islamic State militants, the Department of Homeland Security said on Friday after Britain raised its international terrorism threat level.
Islamic State militants and their supporters, however, have demonstrated the intent and capability to target American citizens overseas, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said in a statement. He noted DHS has taken steps over the summer to strengthen security at overseas airports with direct flights to the United States.
Johnson said he has spoken to UK Home Secretary Theresa May about Britains decision to raise its terrorism alert to the second-highest level. It is the first time since mid-2011 that Britain has been placed on this high of an alert level.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said there was no plan to raise the U.S. threat assessment level.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/29/homeland-security-islamic-state-poses-no-specific-threat-within-the-united-states/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)He has the National Guard on the border to prevent more from entering, OOPS, he missed again.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)believe in. Meanwhile the cons in Britain are playing the same old fear card.
Americans voted for a calm man in charge and it drives the war hawks and fear mongers batshit crazy.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 1, 2014, 10:32 AM - Edit history (1)
US "homeland" (not a fan of that word) It's like, wtf? Explain how ISIS is a direct threat, but they just say it's what they heard someone on TV say. ISIS is a threat to in the region where they're waging war, but they are no more dangerous than any other extreme terrorist group from before. They *might* pose some threats directly to the US, but they won't be taking over US cities anytime soon. At most some lonewolf types might be able to pose some issues, but that's always been a risk. I think ISIS as a whole is more focused on the Syria and Iraq than anything else. But there are plenty of people trying to play up the threat. I suspect that's mostly just to score political points against the democrats, specifically Obama.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)And wants to do it in Syria.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)You can.
moondust
(19,958 posts)Jake Tapper on CNN had a German(?) guy on tonight who said that while fighting ISIS the Free Syrian Army captured a laptop from an ISIS safe house. The laptop had apparently belonged to a chemist or chemistry student and contains information on developing chemical weapons including the possible use of bubonic plague.
(You be the judge.)
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:42 AM - Edit history (1)
It exists in many places now, all they need are some infected hosts, as it's carried by fleas.
I doubt it hurt Mongols when they used it as a biological weapon while on retreat from Europe. All hell broke loose:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025316469#post5
Of course, it wasn't like Europe was a great place at the time, though.
People may think bubonic plague is a bogeyman from the past. But it isn't really. It's found in wildllife in the southwestern USA:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385127/Man-diagnosed-bubonic-plague-Americas-case-year.html
It is a well-managed state that prevents the spread of it. Note that Poland escaped the plague by quarantine, they did not permit their neighbors to enter and spread it:
So I don't think ISIS will have problems with this stunt and it could kill people. Only a strong, well managed nation can prevent it. And DHS has said that ISIS presents no danger to mainland USA.
Still, very creepy stuff.
valerief
(53,235 posts)kickysnana
(3,908 posts)and teachers, unions, liberals etc.