White House To Tweak Birth Control Coverage Rule For Nonprofits
Source: Huffington Post
The Obama administration is developing a new accommodation for religious nonprofit organizations that want to opt out of covering contraception in their health plans without having to fill out a form, according to a brief the Department of Justice filed on Tuesday in the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The move follows the Supreme Court's recent decision granting a temporary injunction to Wheaton College, an evangelical Protestant school in Illinois that is suing the administration over the contraception coverage rule. The Affordable Care Act requires all for-profit employers to cover contraception in their health plans at no cost to their employees, but contains a special accommodation for religiously affiliated nonprofits, such as schools and hospitals.
(snip)
This is part of ensuring that all women have access to contraception coverage," a senior administration official told HuffPost in an email. "The administration believes the accommodation is legally sound, but in light of the Supreme Court order regarding Wheaton College, the Departments intend to augment their regulations to provide an alternative way for objecting non-profit religious organizations to provide notification, while ensuring that enrollees in plans of such organizations receive separate coverage of contraceptive services without cost sharing."
The official said details of the new rule have not yet been worked out. The departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury are working on the rule together and will issue it within a month.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/22/religious-accommodation-birth-control_n_5611570.html?&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016
Gore1FL
(21,116 posts)Skittles
(153,138 posts)it's not good
Jerry442
(1,265 posts)...that provide health care coverage to women provide contraception coverage at no extra charge. No exceptions. The insurance companies will be on board because they'll make more money. The Hobby-Lobby-oids will scream and sue and say it's unconstitutional. Screw 'em. Slow-walk the case so it doesn't get to the SCOTUS for several years, by which time comprehensive coverage of women's health care will be the status quo and everyone will have lost interest.
cstanleytech
(26,273 posts)if they decide to go that route they have to provide 12 months of paid maternity leave.