Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davepc

(3,936 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 10:53 AM Jan 2014

Iraqi Death Scene Pics of Marines Burning Bodies Trigger U.S. Military Investigation

Source: TMZ

The United States military is conducting a formal investigation into American soldiers burning the dead bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents.

TMZ obtained 41 pictures that we're told were shot in Fallujah in 2004. Two pictures show a Marine appearing to pour gasoline or some other flammable on the remains of what officials believe are 2 insurgents. Two other photos show the bodies on fire. You then see charred remains.

...

We have not included all of the photos. Many are just too gruesome. There are well over a dozen bodies in the pics and some are covered with flies and one is being eaten by a dog.

We turned them all over to the Pentagon last week, and a Pentagon official tells us the pics have triggered a Marine Corps investigation.

We're told U.S. Central Command -- the organization in charge of military operations in the Middle East -- also reviewed the photos to determine if they had been previously brought to their attention and determined they had not.

...




Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/01/15/iraq-soldier-bodies-on-fire-marines-investigation-military-photos/



At least TMZ did the right thing by alerting the Pentagon before publishing them.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iraqi Death Scene Pics of Marines Burning Bodies Trigger U.S. Military Investigation (Original Post) davepc Jan 2014 OP
Now, which Repub dumbfucks want to keep crying that we don't have troops there anymore? TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #1
I immediately thought of the 2 burned bodies of Americans hanging from the bridge in March 2004 gulfbreeze Jan 2014 #2
They were apparently shot in 2004 nt thefool_wa Jan 2014 #4
Blackwater Employees were the Stars in George Bushes drama the Rose Petal Parade warrant46 Jan 2014 #21
We would see a lot more of this if our untrustfull military gov were not keeping it from us. L0oniX Jan 2014 #3
I'm not condoning this behavior, but war brings out the worst in people Victor_c3 Jan 2014 #5
The problem is that it's an offense to all those who went to war and didn't commit war crimes. The Stranger Jan 2014 #11
I didn't read that as an apology. Lasher Jan 2014 #14
Undisciplined thugs wearin a uniform NOT Professionals warrant46 Jan 2014 #22
This is what warriors do. I'm neither shocked nor appalled. Jesus Malverde Jan 2014 #6
No, this isn't what "warriors" do. The Stranger Jan 2014 #10
These are US Marines.... Jesus Malverde Jan 2014 #12
There are plenty of marines, soldiers and sailors who are 'warriors', but don't act like penultimate Jan 2014 #31
So what do warriors do in your mind? CFLDem Jan 2014 #20
Professionals don't do this shit warrant46 Jan 2014 #23
need more information gwheezie Jan 2014 #7
Yeah, this wasn't the health department and it wasn't an Iraqi cultural "death ritual." The Stranger Jan 2014 #9
I'm not saying it wasn't a war crime gwheezie Jan 2014 #13
What were they supposed to do? delta17 Jan 2014 #15
How about allow their families back in to collect the bodies of their loved ones! nt polly7 Jan 2014 #16
SUPPORT THE TROOPS! The Stranger Jan 2014 #8
Why did the USA invade Iraq? Octafish Jan 2014 #17
Foreign Oil Companies Operating In Iraq Ash_F Jan 2014 #18
Thanks, Ash_F! It goes back a ways. Octafish Jan 2014 #19
Depends AnalystInParadise Jan 2014 #24
Really? polly7 Jan 2014 #25
No what I am saying is AnalystInParadise Jan 2014 #26
I DO care about the dignity of Iraqi or any people killed anywhere, especially polly7 Jan 2014 #27
We shall agree to disagree AnalystInParadise Jan 2014 #28
'far better people that we faced in Iraq'. polly7 Jan 2014 #29
So you fault me for valuing the soldiers I worked with more AnalystInParadise Jan 2014 #30

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. Now, which Repub dumbfucks want to keep crying that we don't have troops there anymore?
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 11:05 AM
Jan 2014

They'd be nice fat targets for retribution when these photos are widely seen--thank God we're out of there. An ugly episode in American history just got even uglier.

gulfbreeze

(130 posts)
2. I immediately thought of the 2 burned bodies of Americans hanging from the bridge in March 2004
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jan 2014

That made no sense to me. There were questions surrounding their brutal deaths and the contractor, Blackwater, deliberately sending them to their death.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Helvenston

On March 27, two days before Helvenston's scheduled deployment to Iraq, McQuown reassigned him to a team leaving on the 28th, over the objections of numerous other Blackwater employees. Helvenston believed McQuown resented him and deliberately reassigned Helvenston at the last minute. In one of Helvenston's final emails before his death, he wrote to the owner of Blackwater, claiming McQuown's behavior was "very manipulative, duplicitive [sic], immature and unprofessional," with the hidden agenda "Lets [sic] see if we can screw with Scott."[1]

On March 30, McQuown sent Helvenston out with three other contractors, Jerry Zovko, Wesley Batalona and Michael Teague, to guard a convoy for ESS traveling from Baghdad to a military base west of Fallujah. They were in two unarmored vehicles and had no map.[1]


I just always thought it to be a "false flag" type of operation to enrage the American people. I know it sounds crazy but I'm curious about the dates of the photos that are now showing up.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
3. We would see a lot more of this if our untrustfull military gov were not keeping it from us.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 11:49 AM
Jan 2014

This IMO is only a small fraction of what goes on behind our backs. They always hide the truth because deep down inside they know what they are doing is wrong. I used to get pictures and video from some troops I knew before the military got a clue.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
5. I'm not condoning this behavior, but war brings out the worst in people
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 12:49 PM
Jan 2014

I believe that as human beings most of us have an aversion to killing other people. When, during training, that natural aversion is removed from us, you open a door to let more than just killing happen.

Additionally, killing people does a lot to a person's psyche and their morality and feelings of right and wrong. You begin to feel comfortable with it and view life as inconsequential, meaningless, and cheap.

If you don't want to see atrocities, don't send people to war.

---- edit to add ---

About digging through pockets of the dead, that is part of procedure. You might find some valuable intelligence like a map, phone numbers, names, etc.

Also, perhaps they were burning the bodies for sanitary reasons? Several close friends of mine were in Fallujah during Operation Phantom Fury and they told me that after a couple of days of fighting that it was absolutely nasty because of the uncollected remains of insurgents rotting. However, I never heard stories of them burning the remains (or collecting them for that matter).

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
11. The problem is that it's an offense to all those who went to war and didn't commit war crimes.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:19 PM
Jan 2014

And the old "war brings out the worst in people" apology bullshit really doesn't quite get it.

Lasher

(27,573 posts)
14. I didn't read that as an apology.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:58 PM
Jan 2014

You are entitled to your own opinion but you don't speak on behalf of all those who went to war and didn't commit crimes. Some of them would probably be offended by this but I'm pretty sure every single one would not be.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
22. Undisciplined thugs wearin a uniform NOT Professionals
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 08:06 PM
Jan 2014

I blame the NCOs for allowing this mindset--hell a few of them probably joined in

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
6. This is what warriors do. I'm neither shocked nor appalled.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jan 2014
Somehow killing humans is only bad, if your not nice with the bodies.

Marines kill, when they lined up outside Falluja, we knew it wasn't a humanitarian mission. It was revenge for the murder and burning of some blackhawk contractors.

The message was, this is what will happen to your city, when you oppose us.

If there should be any outrage it's at the war criminals who sent these kids in harms way. They sent these Americans to kill or die for all the wrong reasons and should be held to account for their crimes.

---

Burning dead bodies with gasoline. - Outrageous

Burning living human beings with white phosphorous or hellfire missiles. - USA USA USA #1


Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
12. These are US Marines....
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:22 PM
Jan 2014

Do you know what they do?

The war criminals are the leaders who sent them into an illegal war.

The war criminals are the leaders who lied to the American people.

Don't be confused who the REAL war criminals are. They wear suits and ride in limos.

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
31. There are plenty of marines, soldiers and sailors who are 'warriors', but don't act like
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:30 AM
Jan 2014

unprofessional barbarians who act in ways that ultimately put themselves and their fellow servicemen in greater danger by taking actions that are counter productive.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
23. Professionals don't do this shit
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 08:10 PM
Jan 2014

Little babies who are untrained, under trained and unsupervised do this crap.

It does nothing to accomplish the mission to sit around molesting civilians and desecrating corpses.

The officers should be disciplined for allowing this to happen.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
7. need more information
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:02 PM
Jan 2014

If the bodies were decomposing and a health risk, then burning is an acceptable measure to take. I know different cultures including our own has death rituals, but dead is dead. I'm more outraged that we invaded a country based on lies, occupied it and killed the citizens there while losing the lives of so many of our own soldiers, for what?

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
9. Yeah, this wasn't the health department and it wasn't an Iraqi cultural "death ritual."
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jan 2014

This is yet another war crime.

Just, please, for your sake, stop while you're ahead.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
13. I'm not saying it wasn't a war crime
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jan 2014

I'm saying there isn't enough information to determine that, but carry on, I'll quit now.

delta17

(283 posts)
15. What were they supposed to do?
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 06:43 PM
Jan 2014

Just leave the bodies rotting on the street? Got any better solutions than this?

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
8. SUPPORT THE TROOPS!
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 01:15 PM
Jan 2014

Yeah, I still remember the "SUPPORT THE TROOPS!" threads that used to appear here regularly back in 2002-2004.

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
24. Depends
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 08:58 PM
Jan 2014

The Geneva Convention proscribes against mutilating bodies. Does mutilation cover burning bodies for the prevention of disease? I was right down Route Michigan in 2004 in Khaldiyah, close enough to Fallujah to hear the battle. And since this was a siege battle, the spread of disease vectors is a real possibility.

Here is what I do know, packs of feral dogs roam many parts of Iraq, this might be the first you are hearing of it, but I know of several incidients during 2004 and then again in 2007 and 2008 when dead insurgents were burned in the course of weeks long operations to prevent the dogs from getting at them. Second point, the battle was not going to be stopped to allow families to identify bodies, this was a siege and a blockade, movement was strictly controlled and since many of the dead in Fallujah were not Iraqis (notice I didn't say all or most, I said many) no one would have collected them anyway. Third point, I don't have enough information to get outraged and knee jerk blame the military, nor do I have enough information to excuse them completely. What I do know is what I saw, and that is in many cases bodies were burned to prevent animals from getting at them.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
25. Really?
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 09:07 PM
Jan 2014

You're saying it was some kind of compassionate act extended for the dignity of these bodies killed with the use white phosphorous and other napalm-like substances?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah,_The_Hidden_Massacre

Incendiary weapons used against personnel and civilians[edit]

The film states that the use of napalm and similar agents was banned by the United Nations in 1980 for use against civilians and also for use against military targets in proximity to civilians.

The use of white phosphorus, as a marker, smokescreen layer or as a weapon, is not banned by Protocol III of the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. What is prohibited is the use of WP as a weapon against targets in close proximity to civilians or civilian property. The protocol specifically excludes weapons whose incendiary effect is secondary, such as smoke grenades and tracer rounds, although this has been often read as excluding white phosphorus munitions from this protocol, as well. The United States is among the nations that are parties to the convention but have not signed Protocol III.[1]

The March–April 2005 online Field Artillery magazine has confirmed the use of WP (white phosphorus) in so-called "shake 'n bake" attacks, so the use of white phosphorus is substantiated by US Army sources only for screening and psychological effects: "WP proved to be an effective and versatile munition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with [high explosives (HE)]. We fired “shake and bake” missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out." [P.26]
Graphic visual footage of what are claimed to be WP weapons being fired from helicopters into urban areas is displayed, as well as detailed footage of the remains of those allegedly killed by these weapons, including children and women. The filmmakers interview ex US military soldier turned antiwar activist Jeff Englehart of Colorado who discusses the American use of white phosphorus, nicknamed "Willie Pete" (pre-NATO US phonetic alphabet for "WP" - White Phosphorus) by U.S. servicemembers, in built-up areas, and describes the Fallujah offensive as "just a massive killing of Arabs." Englehart spent two days in Fallujah during the battle.[2]

Following pressure from former Labour MP Alice Mahon, the British Ministry of Defence confirmed the use of MK77 by US forces during the initial invasion of Iraq.[3]


Sorry ........ I don't buy it for a second.
 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
26. No what I am saying is
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 09:13 PM
Jan 2014

that I don't have enough evidence to come to a conclusion, but in four tours in Iraq we burned dead bodies on multiple occasions to keep them from the dogs, which also keeps us safer. Packs of feral dogs were eventually made shoot on sight targets because of the danger they posed to us on our bases. So burning dead bodies keeps us safer because it gives the ferals one less reason to come near us. Secondly, burning dead bodies keeps us safer as it eliminates a source of disease. I give two shits about Iraqi insurgents and I doubt most of friends with me did either. But I could see us burn bodies to keep us safer, definitely.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
27. I DO care about the dignity of Iraqi or any people killed anywhere, especially
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 09:29 PM
Jan 2014

during war crimes. My great uncle was captured during WW1 and died in a German prison camp. His remains have been moved twice by the people of Germany - he has a marker, they lay wreaths, it's dignified - he was a HUMAN BEING deserving to be remembered. Just as those 'insurgents' in their own fucking country! It wasn't up to you or anyone else to burn their bodies!

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
28. We shall agree to disagree
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jan 2014

Serve in a war and get back to me. Sorry for your uncle, he died at the hands of far better people that we faced in Iraq.

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
30. So you fault me for valuing the soldiers I worked with more
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 11:15 PM
Jan 2014

than Iraqi insurgents? You are absolutely right that does about say it all. I valued my fellow Americans over people that were trying to kill me. I was there following legal orders, you know how I know they were legal orders? Because in 2008 my guy, my President, Barack Obama kept us there for three more years to fight and train the Iraqis. So yes I was following legal orders with my fellow citizens, and I will never be ashamed of that fact. And you nor anyone else will ever make me feel bad for caring about my friends and battle buddies and not giving a shit about the people trying to kill me. You are entitled to your opinion, I won't say you aren't entitled but that does about say it all. So please by all means continue to insult me and anyone else who served over there for not caring about the people trying to kill us. Please, continue.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iraqi Death Scene Pics of...