HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Feinstein And Rogers Say ...

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:24 PM

 

Feinstein And Rogers Say Terrorism Threat To US Is Increasing

Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Associated Press in Washington
theguardian.com, Sunday 1 December 2013 12.56 EST

The terrorism threat against the United States is increasing and Americans are not as safe as they were a year or two ago, the leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees said on Sunday.

Senator Dianne Feinstein and Representative Mike Rogers appeared together on CNN's State of the Union, on the day that al-Qaida's US spokesperson called for attacks on US interests around the world. Rogers said al-Qaida groups had changed their means of communication as a result of leaks about US surveillance programs, making it harder to detect potential plots in the early planning stages.

"We're fighting amongst ourselves here in this country about the role of our intelligence community that it is having an impact on our ability to stop what is a growing number of threats," he said. "And so we've got to shake ourselves out of this pretty soon and understand that our intelligence services are not the bad guys."

Feinstein, a California Democrat, said there were more terrorist groups than ever, with more sophisticated and hard-to-detect bombs. She said: "There is huge malevolence out there."

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/01/feinstein-rogers-terrorism-threat-intelligence-committees

91 replies, 5505 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 91 replies Author Time Post
Reply Feinstein And Rogers Say Terrorism Threat To US Is Increasing (Original post)
Purveyor Dec 2013 OP
Garion_55 Dec 2013 #1
mpcamb Dec 2013 #21
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #23
IDemo Dec 2013 #2
msongs Dec 2013 #3
fujiyama Dec 2013 #4
frylock Dec 2013 #11
mike_c Dec 2013 #5
TBF Dec 2013 #6
NRaleighLiberal Dec 2013 #7
warrant46 Dec 2013 #74
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #77
warrant46 Dec 2013 #88
AndyA Dec 2013 #8
uppityperson Dec 2013 #9
hobbit709 Dec 2013 #10
deurbano Dec 2013 #12
catchnrelease Dec 2013 #13
nolabels Dec 2013 #31
leftyohiolib Dec 2013 #14
SwankyXomb Dec 2013 #36
leftyohiolib Dec 2013 #37
RC Dec 2013 #15
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #19
RC Dec 2013 #22
SoapBox Dec 2013 #16
Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #18
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #20
Maedhros Dec 2013 #54
Maedhros Dec 2013 #43
ronnie624 Dec 2013 #53
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #55
Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #17
bemildred Dec 2013 #24
Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #25
indepat Dec 2013 #26
Mr.Bill Dec 2013 #29
davidpdx Dec 2013 #27
Zorro Dec 2013 #28
okaawhatever Dec 2013 #33
TiberiusB Dec 2013 #45
warrant46 Dec 2013 #75
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #67
ForgoTheConsequence Dec 2013 #44
Zorro Dec 2013 #46
ForgoTheConsequence Dec 2013 #47
cali Dec 2013 #59
Zorro Dec 2013 #63
cali Dec 2013 #66
Zorro Dec 2013 #71
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #68
Zorro Dec 2013 #72
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #73
Zorro Dec 2013 #76
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #78
Zorro Dec 2013 #79
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #80
Zorro Dec 2013 #82
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #83
Zorro Dec 2013 #84
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #85
Pathwalker Dec 2013 #30
Laelth Dec 2013 #32
Xithras Dec 2013 #49
Laelth Dec 2013 #56
pipoman Dec 2013 #87
sendero Dec 2013 #34
winter is coming Dec 2013 #35
GoneFishin Dec 2013 #38
Doctor_J Dec 2013 #39
AtheistCrusader Dec 2013 #40
blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #41
Xithras Dec 2013 #42
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #81
ReRe Dec 2013 #48
DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #86
Ace Acme Dec 2013 #89
ReRe Dec 2013 #91
1000words Dec 2013 #50
Deep13 Dec 2013 #51
ancianita Dec 2013 #52
Nihil Dec 2013 #58
CanSocDem Dec 2013 #62
Scuba Dec 2013 #57
hatrack Dec 2013 #60
Javaman Dec 2013 #61
Trillo Dec 2013 #64
Titonwan Dec 2013 #65
knic Dec 2013 #69
DCBob Dec 2013 #70
Arkana Dec 2013 #90

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:26 PM

1. NSA suckups

is my guess.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Garion_55 (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:12 PM

21. So do they mean...

If we only spend a little MORE of our national budget on spying and waiting even LONGER at airport security, things will be safer?

I got a better idea. Be a better world citizen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mpcamb (Reply #21)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:28 PM

23. Corporations may be people but they can't be citizens.

 

Fiduciary duty and all that. Their code of ethics prohibits it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:31 PM

2. We are not the bad guys either

Stop sniffing our packets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:31 PM

3. if Feinstein would resign, that would lessen her threat nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:34 PM

4. I hate this woman

Both of them are trying to brush aside the NSA spying issues under the rug. "Nothin to see here, move along".

How, California are you stuck with perhaps the worst Democrat in the Senate?

As for Rogers, I expect nothing else. Another republican.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fujiyama (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:04 PM

11. brand recognition..

Same way we'll probably get stuck with Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:38 PM

5. Feinstein is an embarrassment....

Ugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:38 PM

6. Translation -

NSA spying is off the table.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:43 PM

7. Must be time to ratchet up the fear factor....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:08 PM

74. Feinstein = Just in time to get the sheep to demand more military spending

We need more F-35s 2800 at 280 million $$ each

and Ford Aircraft Carriers for 35 Billion $$$$

</sarcasm>

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to warrant46 (Reply #74)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:26 PM

77. I'm wondering what possible use an aircraft carrier could have in defending our country

 

... i.e., what it can do in that role that our own domestic air bases can not do better.

Obviously the only use for an aircraft carrier is to project force and intimidate countries far from our borders--which is why we have 15 of them (and 3 more under construction) when the rest of the world has only 15 combined.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #77)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 07:09 AM

88. The planes they carry are used to bomb the crap out of guys who live in Mud Huts

and ride Camels. Follow the money trial when it comes to this 80 year plus Old Fossil Feinstein.

If one of her LARGE supporters can make a defense Buck or 2 some how she will be on the front line throwing grenades and providing some filthy lucre !!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:54 PM

8. Let me just make a wild guess here...

MORE spying? MORE surveillance?

I guess it's a necessity now that Terra! Terra! Terra! is being pushed--again. I think it's time for Feinstein to go.

What's the quote? Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (Benjamin Franklin)

I think I'll go with Ben on this one, he seems a much wiser person than Feinstein or Rogers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:59 PM

9. The problem about crying Wolf! is that some day there may very well be a wolf.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:02 PM

10. I consider DiFi a threat to the security of the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #10)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:33 PM

12. Ditto

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #10)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:43 PM

13. Yes, what you said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #10)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:48 PM

31. If this was a bar i would say what i really think

but i can say I have heard there is that polite but not polite word for a person like this and it's called a 'madame'. Anything for a sale no matter who gets screwed, most obviously

It's also a curse to us that modern medicine will keep and help people this to stay somewhat cogent so in that way she could be in office for a long time longer

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:48 PM

14. hey d-fi what 's the terrorist color code for today?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftyohiolib (Reply #14)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:09 PM

36. As far as she and her husband are concered,

Green, with extra dollar signs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SwankyXomb (Reply #36)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:17 PM

37. she profits by keeping us afraid

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 02:53 PM

15. Maybe if we would help people instead of killing them as a foreign policy, there wouldn't be much of

 

a terrorest threat to wave in our faces.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RC (Reply #15)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:07 PM

19. Making hundreds of thousands of orphans today ensures continued prosperity

 

... for the military-industrial-security-congressional-media-lobbist complex for decades to come.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #19)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:13 PM

22. Yeah, speaking of the real terrorists behind the terrorism...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:03 PM

16. I don't like either one of them BUT

Please tell us, NSA ranters, what EXACTLY is your plan to root out those (including batshit crazy wackos Americans here) that want to do major harm here?

I've been waiting since Comrade Snowden, the Traitor, yapped his flap, to see serious thoughts and ideas but...the usual crickets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoapBox (Reply #16)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:06 PM

18. My plan is to simply surrender liberties in the name of security. It's working pretty well so far.

 

On edit: Well, except for the security part, as Feinstein and Rogers now tell us.

Quite a bargain, that: Frittering away our freedoms for perpetual fear of the terror bogeyman.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoapBox (Reply #16)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:10 PM

20. Maybe realism is appropriate

 

---accepting that a certain amount of terrorism is the price of freedom.

We accept a certain number of auto accidents as the cost of having cars.

We accept a certain number of mad shooters as the cost of having guns.

We accept a certain number of plane crashes as the cost of flying.

Why must anti-terrorism be a zero-fail program?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #20)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:18 AM

54. The amount of money, effort and blood we spend on "terrorism"

 

is so incredibly out-of-scale compared to the threat it presents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoapBox (Reply #16)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:25 PM

43. You are more likely to be hit by lightning than to be a victim of a terrorist attack.

 

Have some perspective.

At no time in this country's history have there been no "batshit crazy wackos" attempting to harm us. The United States still managed to make it to the 21st century without cowering under our beds, pleading for Big Brother to take our civil liberties in trade for his benevolent protection. Until now.

Your arguments, frankly, make me sick. Tens of thousands of Americans have died to protect our civil liberties, but shameless authoritarian cowards stand ready across this nation to surrender those rights for the illusion of safety. This current batch of mealy-mouthed political bottom-feeders have so easily convinced the weak-minded among us that bedraggled tribal insurgents in far-off third-world backwaters are an existential threat to the nation. Torture, murder and destruction in the pursuit of the terrorist chimera are accepted without question by the rank and file yet, when brave individuals stand up and reveal the corruption behind the thin veil of "national security," they are shouted down and insulted by those who pretend to champion democracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maedhros (Reply #43)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:25 AM

53. Excellent post.

In no way does terrorism threaten the ruling power structure of the United States. A person is far, far more likely to die in a car wreck, an accident in their own home or from any number of diseases, than from a terrorist attack. Those who are ready to dismantle democracy out of fear of terrorism, merit nothing but scorn. My lip curls of its own volition when I read irrational posts like the one above.

A reversal of our government's policies of aggression for the domination of resources that belong to others, would more effectively reduce the threat of terrorism, anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ronnie624 (Reply #53)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:50 AM

55. What happened to the land of the free and the home of the brave?

 

Last edited Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:25 PM - Edit history (1)

We hire mercenaries to be brave for us, and surrender our rights while we cower in our homes, watching the mercenaries we hire to play football for us from our barcalounger chairs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:04 PM

17. Why on earth would anyone be upset with the US?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:41 PM

24. So our present strategy is not working? We need to reform our security agencies?

Not a chance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 03:47 PM

25. I saw an interesting observation that they want to get everything into a NSA reform bill.

The fear is if they don't, amendments will be added to other appropriation bills on an ongoing basis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:09 PM

26. Do the terraists created by the war on terra really hate us for our freedoms rather than our

policies and actions? Inquiring minds want to know my dear Senator and congress-critter

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to indepat (Reply #26)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:27 PM

29. No, they hate us because

we have gone to their part of the world and murdered hundreds of thousands of people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:10 PM

27. Rogers and Feinstein's: They are coming to get you and blow you up

Two thumbs down - Roger & Ebert

A bad sequel to the Bush/Cheney 2001 tap dance - LA Times

The movie should be called '2013: A total Odyssey' - New York Times

Fear and Loathing in Congress - SF Chronicle

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:20 PM

28. I believe Feinstein and Rogers understand the threat more than most

and ignoring their remarks is equivalent to the Shrub's casual dismissal of the 9/11 warnings.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #28)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:15 PM

33. Agreed. Also, a successful terrorist attack energizes them even more. If Iraq and Afghanistan become

training grounds for extremist groups again, there's no telling what will happen. One thing that will come out of the fighting in the middle east is radical, trained soldiers.
Until I learn that the NSA is doing much worse than in the recent past, I'm willing to let it continue. Snowden's revelations have done little to benefit the citizens of the US and a lot more to benefit our enemies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okaawhatever (Reply #33)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 11:16 PM

45. You can prove that, of course

I sincerely doubt Feinstein, Rogers, you, or any other NSA apologist can actually point to any proof that the Snowden leaks helped any terrorist group. The same claims were made during the Bradley/Chelsea Manning trial, none of which held up under scrutiny. The U.S. has a century of questionable to outright disastrous foreign policy in the Middle East to answer for. Even if we completely cleaned up our act now, it would take a generation or more to fix the damage. There will be more blowback at some point, I guarantee it, and no amount of NSA overreach will stop it (they couldn't stop the Boston bombing, and that was just two relative amateurs). As for learning that the NSA is "doing much worse than in the recent past" (which assumes that the actions of the NSA in the recent past are somehow good), how do you expect to do that? Are you planning to wait for the NSA to confess, or perhaps for some whistle-blower to go public? Which seems more likely?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TiberiusB (Reply #45)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:13 PM

75. There are a lot of apologists for snooping here

Its hard to determine if they are seriously touched or just naive

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okaawhatever (Reply #33)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:31 PM

67. Way back in 2004 abc news tested security

 

Last edited Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:41 PM - Edit history (2)

... protecting against two easily foreseeable terrorist attacks.

They left backpacks on the trains in the Philly-DC corridor, and they drove through open gates into chemical plants in New Jersey. There was nothing to stop them, and nothing to stop any terrorists either.

There is no shortage of soft targets, no shortage of scenarios which would even allow the perps to escape.

Specific to the chemical plants, back in 2004 the EPA had the authority to demand that defenses such as tank traps be installed to prevent motorized terrorist assault, and did not exercise that authority.

Now it appears that the four gunmen in the Kenyan shopping mall attack escaped.







Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #28)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 11:00 PM

44. Lol.

I'll make sure to stock up on duct tape.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #44)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 11:21 PM

46. Ignorance is bliss

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #46)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:11 AM

47. Sure it is.

So is living my life without a perpetual fear of Muslim boogy-men.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #28)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:26 AM

59. Yeah? well, I believe Leahy understands it better than the corrupt piece of dog shit

 

that is feinstein.

He disagrees strongly with her.

she's putrid, lying and corrupt. fuck her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #59)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:02 AM

63. Leahy is not a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee

and thus is not privy to the detailed information that Feinstein -- the committee chairperson -- is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #63)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:16 AM

66. I'm sorry, but that so doesn't cut it.

 

Leahy has far more information than YOU. And I'll take his word over yours on the NSA any day of the week.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #66)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:48 PM

71. Try reading my post without a bag on your head

Leahy is NOT a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and will not know as much about the increase in terrorist threats as Feinstein -- the committee chairperson -- knows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #63)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:32 PM

68. Leahy is not a member of the Senate Intel Committee, and thus is likely not subject to blackmail

 

. . . to which Feinstein likely is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #68)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:50 PM

72. You seriously believe Feinstein is being blackmailed to make those statements?

Sounds as if someone is watching too many conspiracy movies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #72)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:03 PM

73. You seriously believe she is not?

 

Isn't it the most reasonable explanation for why those charged with overseeing the intel agencies have instead become their biggest fans?

Hey, it worked for J. Edgar Hoover, didn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #73)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:19 PM

76. Avoiding answering the question, I see

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #76)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:28 PM

78. As are you. I seriously believe as little as possible.

 


I try to pay attention to what's going on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #78)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:30 PM

79. If you seriously believe Feinstein is being blackmailed

you're not paying that much attention to reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #79)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:47 PM

80. Maybe you should learn to read a little more carefully before commenting

 

.. on what you think I believe, and reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #80)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:04 PM

82. You were given the opportunity to declare whether you believe Feinstein is being blackmailed

and you chose to dissemble.

You either believe it or not; in either case, it's a supremely silly implication.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #82)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:06 PM

83. I was not interested in your crude, misframed questions.

 

Your belief that the prospect of blackmail of elected officials is "silly" is very naive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ace Acme (Reply #83)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:15 PM

84. So do you think Feinstein is being blackmailed

to make those statements regarding the increased threat of terrorism?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #84)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:52 AM

85. I didn't say that. Why do you insist on living in a binary world? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 04:37 PM

30. Mr. Rogers, does your wife still work for the MIC as a lobbyist?

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:14 PM

32. When is she going to retire?

It's a shame that California has only one reliable Senator. I eagerly await Kamala Harris, or just about any other Democrat, replacing Senator Feinstein.

-Laelth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laelth (Reply #32)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:37 AM

49. 2018

She's already 80, and has recently dropped a couple of hints suggesting that she won't run again once her current term is up. Her current term ends in 2018. Barring any age-related intervention, she'll be with us at least until then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xithras (Reply #49)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:14 AM

56. Not what I wanted to hear, per se.

But thanks for giving me the scoop.



-Laelth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xithras (Reply #49)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:47 AM

87. Also given hints she is becoming demented..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 05:38 PM

34. You think?

You yap about capabilities, what about motivation? Every drone strike that kills a civilian is motivation. I'm absolutely certain the threat is increasing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 06:58 PM

35. So, all that spying hasn't made us safer? Time to hang it up, then. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:31 PM

38. If her lobbyists, campaign donors, and husband were profiting from a war on killer bees she

would be telling us how the threat from killer bees is growing, while supporting programs to poke the hives with a stick.

What a joke.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:06 PM

39. I know! More Pentagon spending, offset by more SNAP cuts! It never fails!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:44 PM

40. More like the threat from their lobbyists is increasing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:47 PM

41. How much is DiFi and Rogers making off that industry?

 

Terra! Terra! Terra!

Scared yet?!?!

Threat level: "Brown"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:00 PM

42. We drop bombs on Arab babies and use their anger as justification to drop more bombs.

"Reap what ye sow".

The problem with America is that we like to do a lot of sowing, but we bitch like hell when it comes time to reap. You can't kill other peoples children and then act shocked when they want to kill yours back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xithras (Reply #42)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:51 PM

81. You nailed it. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:31 AM

48. Fear, fear, fear, fearing fear.



So what does DiFi and Rep Rogers suggest we do? Be afraid, be very afraid?

Why shoud I be afraid? I don't have any enemies!

Seriously, WTF do they want We The People to do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ReRe (Reply #48)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:19 AM

86. They want us to accept NSA spying. They want us to shut up.

 

They're clear about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DisgustipatedinCA (Reply #86)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:05 PM

89. What a legacy for a Senatorial Career!

 

She should have got an MBA instead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DisgustipatedinCA (Reply #86)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:21 PM

91. Ha! Fat chance!

Like dictators, they think they can just tell us to shut up and that we will just shut up?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:48 AM

50. There must be some rights that need taking away.

 

Which ones are left?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:10 AM

51. Feinstein is a control freak. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:22 AM

52. I've mistrusted this senator for the longest. This thread helps reinforce why.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #52)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:11 AM

58. The thread also provides another useful service ...

 

... by showing everyone which posters upthread are actively supporting the right-wing
pro-NSA and pro-MIC talking points.

(Not that there were any surprises but it's still good to keep it in the open.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nihil (Reply #58)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 09:27 AM

62. Indeed. (eom)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 05:21 AM

57. ... with every drone.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 08:36 AM

60. STFU, DiFi

Fucking retire already!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 08:38 AM

61. fear, Fear, FEAR!!!

some guy once said, "we have nothing to fear but fear itself". Yeah, some guy.

we have fallen so far.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:30 AM

64. Fear Porn

I've been trying to think of a time when there was not some huge scare lying in wait just around the next corner. I can't think of one.

How does this FEAR PORN help our supposedly inalienable right to 'pursuit of happiness'?

Perhaps the times or ages before electronics, TV, or radio, really were better times, as the only FEAR PORN one got was local. Now we get local, national, and international FEAR PORN, 24/7.

Enjoy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 11:02 AM

65. These two deserve prison time

And the other filth that use spying for their own power designs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:00 PM

69. Does Feinstein know that the US drones are flying over Pakistan

 

Killing people (who are they?) every now and then?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2013, 08:05 PM

70. This got my attention.

I suspect there is some truth to this. I doubt she would simply be making this up or exaggerating for some personal gain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:08 PM

90. BOOGA BOOGA BOOGA!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread