Rupert Murdoch Defends NY Post’s Bombing Coverage
Last edited Sat Apr 20, 2013, 10:33 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: TPM
BENJY SARLIN 9:40 AM EDT, SATURDAY APRIL 20, 2013
The New York Post had a series of embarassing missteps this week about both the magnitude of the Boston bombing (they inaccurately reported 12 dead) and the players involved (they splashed two people on their front page who had nothing to do with the attack under the headline "Bag Men" , but owner Rupert Murdoch defended their coverage on Saturday.
Rupert Murdoch ✔ @rupertmurdoch
All NYPost pics were those distributed by FBI. And instantly withdrawn when FBI changed directions.
9:36 AM - 20 Apr 2013
###
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rupert-murdoch-defends-ny-posts-bombing-coverage
Here's a link to an article reporting the editor of the NYP's response. Interesting what he doesn't come right out and report, the pics were LEAKED to the paper.
Post editor on Bag Men cover: We did not identify them as suspects
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022702742
Squinch
(50,941 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)and their boss praised them so this is what we got, terrible news reporting being praised by their bosses and owners. So far NBC and MSNBC was mainly more factual in their reporting. They kinda reminded me of the old CNN.
johnfunk
(6,113 posts)We smell smoke, people running to the center, cars going straight, cars turning to the right, [Deborah Feyerick] said, her voice straining with urgency, as a caravan of dark SUVs sped by. Something has just happened. Police officers are running, we have a dog, a dog thats on its way. Interesting, that dog is barking. Whether thats a canine, we dont know. This is what the news has been like: reporters and producers focused on finding and transmitting action, even if that action is meaningless or indecipherable. In the rush to give the audience something new, CNN airs an Urgent News Report about a dog excuse me, a possible dog barking.Someone cue James Earl Jones: "Something has just happened. We don't know. This is CNN."
rpannier
(24,329 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)MOTRDemocrat
(87 posts)greiner3
(5,214 posts)Well, at least that means he can't be president!
Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)He should be firing people.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)I'm assuming you're referring to Murdock here, and he's the biggest part of the problem. In any bureaucracy, those down the food chain will only do what they know management will tolerate and approve. If any of the reporters and editors involved in this thought this kind of stuff would cost them their jobs, they wouldn't do it. The Post and Fox "News" gets away with the shit they throw because they know it's what Rupert wants.
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)ntnt
BREMPRO
(2,331 posts)jumping to conclusions without proper sourcing and research and making stuff up around selective threads of truth for political points.. par for the course for NYDN and FOX
heaven05
(18,124 posts)the alleged culprit was brown skinned enough to make the connection. That's all that was needed by murdturd and his crew of 'journalists'.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)the less you trust humanity.
TeamPooka
(24,218 posts)DakotaLady
(246 posts)... that he never gets anywhere near being able to buy the Los Angeles Times.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I hope you get sued by them and they make a few million off you.
El Shaman
(583 posts)here's another immigrant that is, a big, part of the problem of what is wrong with America!!!
GeoWilliam750
(2,522 posts)"No self-respecting fish would want to be wrapped in a Murdoch paper", and "[H]is goal is not quality journalism. His goal is vast power for Rupert Murdoch, political power".